Processing math: 100%
LV Chaoyan, GAO Zhixi, MA Xiuqing, et al. Effect of Different Hot Air Drying Temperatures on Quality of Chimonobambusa quadrangularis Shoots [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(11): 23−29. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070253.
Citation: LV Chaoyan, GAO Zhixi, MA Xiuqing, et al. Effect of Different Hot Air Drying Temperatures on Quality of Chimonobambusa quadrangularis Shoots [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(11): 23−29. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070253.

Effect of Different Hot Air Drying Temperatures on Quality of Chimonobambusa quadrangularis Shoots

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2020
  • Available Online: April 06, 2021
  • In order to clarify the effect of temperature on the quality of Chimonobambusa quadrangularis shoots dried by hot air, different temperatures (65, 75, 85, 95 ℃) were set. The effects of temperature on moisture content, color, rehydration ratio, total sugar, reducing sugar, soluble protein, free amino acid, as well as sensory score, were studied. The results showed that the moisture content of bamboo shoots decreased rapidly with the increase of drying time, the higher the temperature, the faster the decline rate. The brightness (L) value, redness (a) value and yellowness (b) value of dried bamboo shoots all increased first and then decreased with the increase of drying temperature, while the color difference (∆E) value decreased first and then increased later, the minimum value of 75 ℃ treatment was 15.47±3.94. The rehydration ratio of dried bamboo shoots increased with the rehydration time. When it basically did not increase, the rehydration ratio was 75 ℃>85 ℃>65 ℃>95 ℃ in order from large to small, and the maximum rehydration ratio of 75 ℃ treatment was 6.11±0.44. The content of total sugar, soluble protein and free amino acid of dried bamboo shoots decreased with the increase of drying temperature. Compared with 65 ℃ treatment, the contents of 95 ℃ treatment decreased by 1.23%, 2.67%, 0.71 μg/100 g, respectively. The reducing sugar content of dried bamboo shoots increased first and then decreased with the increase of temperature. The 75 and 85 ℃ treatments were higher than the 65 and 95 ℃ treatments and the difference was significant (P<0.05). At the same time, the dried bamboo shoots’ comprehensive score of the sensory score increased first and then decreased. The highest comprehensive score of 75 ℃ treatment was 86.30±3.92 points, which was significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.05) and reached the first classification standard. It can be seen that the hot air drying treatment at 75 ℃ is more conducive to maintaining the nutritional and sensory quality and rehydration performance of the dried bamboo shoots while ensuring a faster drying rate, which is an appropriate temperature for the hot air drying processing of the bamboo shoots.
  • [1]
    中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第九卷第一分册)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
    [2]
    张喜, 张佐玉, 王先华. 林地覆盖糠壳对金佛山方竹笋量的影响[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,1997,16(3):50−53.
    [3]
    李睿, 吴良如, 周昌平. 方竹笋矿质元素营养成分的研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2007,26(4):37−39.
    [4]
    吴鹏, 丁访军, 殷建强, 等. 施肥对金佛山方竹竹笋的影响[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2010,29(4):31−35.
    [5]
    Wankhade P K, Sapkal R S, Sapkal V S. Drying characteristics of okra slices on drying in hot air dryer[J]. Procedia Engineering,2013,51:371−374. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.051
    [6]
    郭婷, 黎文清, 叶姗丹, 等. 热风干燥温度对香芋产品品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(3):5−8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2017.03.002
    [7]
    李海登, 蒋佳男, 陈兰, 等. 不同干燥方式影响雪莲果品质特性的研究[J]. 食品科技,2019,44(7):96−100.
    [8]
    Singh G D, Sharma R, Bawa A S, et al. Drying and rehydration characteristics of water chestnut (Trapa natans) as a function of drying air temperature[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2008,87(2):213−221. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.11.027
    [9]
    陆蒸, 林启训, 王浩, 等. 毛竹笋热泵干燥特性及制品复重率[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2002,31(1):117−120.
    [10]
    龙成树, 张艳来, 龚丽. 闭式循环热泵干燥竹笋片工艺优化[J]. 食品科技,2015,40(3):100−106.
    [11]
    Gui F, Wu J, Chen F, et al. Change of polyphenol oxidase activity, color, and browning degree during storage of cloudy apple juice treated by supercritical carbon dioxide[J]. European Food Research and Technology,2006,223(3):427−432. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0219-3
    [12]
    Maskan M. Drying, shrinkage and rehydration characteristics of kiwifruits during hot air and microwave drying[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2001,48(2):177−182. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00155-2
    [13]
    张耀雷, 黄立新, 张彩虹, 等. 不同干燥方式对壶瓶枣粉品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2016,37(1):76−85.
    [14]
    李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
    [15]
    张伟光, 林永生, 林娈, 等. 绿竹笋干制工艺的研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2005,20(2):56−59.
    [16]
    张仁固, 李明, 汪晓晴, 等. 南川方竹笋特殊品质形成原因初探[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2010,8(1):30−33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0431.2010.01.009
    [17]
    王腾, 宁正祥, 张业辉, 等. 超声波辅助盐渍对鲩鱼干品质和微观结构的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2017,33(11):75−82.
    [18]
    Sagar V R, Kumar P S. Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: A review[J]. Journal of Food Science & Technology,2010,47(1):15−26.
    [19]
    Doymaz I, Ismail O. Drying characteristics of sweet cherry[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing,2011,89(1):31−38. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2010.03.006
    [20]
    杨婧, 邓媛元, 张雁, 等. 不同温度热风预干燥对热风-真空冷冻联合干燥龙眼果干品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2019,35(5):175−183.
    [21]
    宋江峰, 李大婧, 刘春泉. 温度对甜玉米果泥β-胡萝卜素和色泽变化的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2011,27(4):863−867. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.04.030
    [22]
    Argyropoulos D, Joachim M. Effect of convection-, vacuum- and freeze drying methods on essential oil content and composition of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.)[J]. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal & Aromatic Plants,2014,1(2):59−69.
    [23]
    Zhang F, Zhao J, Chen F, et al. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing on quality of yellow peaches in pouch[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2011,27(6):337−343.
    [24]
    Zhou L, Wang Y, Hu X, et al. Effect of high pressure carbon dioxide on the quality of carrot juice[J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies,2009,10(3):321−327. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2009.01.002
    [25]
    胡庆国, 张慜, 杜卫华, 等. 不同干燥方式对颗粒状果蔬品质变化的影响[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2006,25(2):28−32. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-1689.2006.02.007
    [26]
    郭婷, 陈振林, 何新益, 等. 热风干燥温度对甘薯粉品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2016,32(1):175−178.
    [27]
    周美琪, 周其德, 田赛莺, 等. 低盐腌制对缙云梅干菜加工品质的影响[J]. 核农学报,2018,32(8):1562−1571. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.08.1562
    [28]
    李佳, 白羽嘉, 黄婷婷, 等. 干制温度对哈密瓜片品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发,2018,39(14):58−63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2018.14.011
    [29]
    王素雅, 王璋. 香蕉汁储藏过程中非酶褐变的研究[J]. 食品科学,2005,26(12):81−85. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2005.12.015
    [30]
    张馨允, 宋云, 范学辉, 等. 干制温度对脱苦杏仁品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2017,33(4):180−183.
    [31]
    杨靖东, 姜雯翔, 史晓媛, 等. 不同热风干燥温度对发芽糙米品质的影响[J]. 粮食储藏,2013,42(3):30−34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6958.2013.03.007
    [32]
    杨晓红, 赵宏亮, 丁陈, 等. 不同热风干燥温度对番木瓜粉品质与香气成分的影响[J]. 热带作物学报,2018,39(2):372−379. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2018.02.024
    [33]
    王林. 模糊数学法在川明参鸡肉丸感官评定中的应用[J]. 中国调味品,2015,20(3):9−11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2015.03.003
    [34]
    Nadia D M, Nourhène B, Nabil K, et al. Influence of air drying temperature on kinetics, physicochemical properties, total phenolic content and ascorbic acid of pears[J]. Food & Bioproducts Processing,2012,90(3):433−441.
    [35]
    胡云峰, 位锦锦, 李宁宁, 等. 不同热风干燥温度对枸杞干燥特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2017,43(1):130−134.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAO Xiaoliang, MOU He, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Weijie. Optimization of the Extraction Process and in Vitro Antioxidant and Hypolipidemic Activities of Polysaccharides from Sophora flavescens[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(13): 212-220. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023120305
    [2]KANG Zhongyu, ZHAO Daqing, YAO Jiajing, ZHAO Liming, HUANG Baotai, LIU Li, QI Bin. Optimization of Flash Extraction Process and Antioxidant Activity of American Ginseng Flower Polysaccharides[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(7): 184-190. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050278
    [3]HUANG Minghao, HUANG Taiqi, DENG Lijuan. Optimization of Solanum lyratum Crude Polysaccharide Extraction Process Using Response Surface Methodology and Analysis ofIts In Vitro Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 219-225. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023040182
    [4]WANG Yan, DUAN Xuewei, ZHANG Minjun, YANG Huiwen, LIU Bing, YOU Tianhui. Optimization of Extraction Process of Polysaccharide from Black Corn Kernel by Response Surface Method and Analysis of Its Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 191-200. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023020118
    [5]XIA Yuhong, LIU Ying, ZHOU Ming, ZHU Zhenxin, LU Yue, LIU Hongcun, MENG Juan, GONG Zhiqiang, YANG Lifang. Extraction Process Optimization and Antioxidant Activity of Total Flavonoids from Haloragis micrantha (Thunb.) R. Brown.[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(18): 244-250. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022100235
    [6]ZHANG Minjun, DUAN Xuewei, WANG Yan, YANG Huiwen, LIU Bing, XIANG Wenjing, YOU Tianhui. Optimization of Ethanol Extraction Process for Active Components from Broussonetia papyrifera Root Bark and Its Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(11): 196-203. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070304
    [7]WEI Yuping, ZHAO Yan, ZHANG Li, WANG Qiongqiong, PU Yunfeng, HOU Xujie, SONG Lijun. Optimization of Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction of Phenylethanoside from Cistanche tubulosa and Its Antioxidant Activities[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(13): 148-155. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090248
    [8]XU Xian, AN Zhaoxiang, LI Xiaoming, LIU Fuyuan, CHENG Hongzhen, SHEN Yonggen, CAI Zhipeng. Optimization of Extraction Process of Protein from Citrus Peel and Its Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(16): 154-162. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110070
    [9]LI Xin-ran, ZHANG Hua-xing, WENG Gui-ying, WANG Xu-ying. Optimization of Extraction Process of Total Flavonoids from Passion Fruit and Its Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(24): 106-112. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020020275
    [10]CAO Pei-jie, CUI Jin, MA Yan-hong. Optimization of Ultrasonic Enzymatic Extraction of Flavonoids from Mulberry Seed and Its Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(2): 175-182. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.02.031
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 果欣雨,侯蔷,吴江爱,谷守国,周璇,郑百芹,周鑫. 注水肉的类型及检测方法研究. 养殖与饲料. 2025(02): 118-122 .
    2. 韩会丽. 如何区分PSE肉、注水肉及注胶肉. 青海畜牧兽医杂志. 2024(06): 56-57+60 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (212) PDF downloads (24) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return