CHEN Lilan, WANG Mingfang, SHAN Yuqing, et al. In Vitro Probiotic Properties of Human-derived Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Yining, Xinjiang[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(5): 153−160. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023060155.
Citation: CHEN Lilan, WANG Mingfang, SHAN Yuqing, et al. In Vitro Probiotic Properties of Human-derived Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Yining, Xinjiang[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(5): 153−160. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023060155.

In Vitro Probiotic Properties of Human-derived Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Yining, Xinjiang

More Information
  • Received Date: June 15, 2023
  • Available Online: December 28, 2023
  • Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is widely distributed in nature and is one of the most widely developed and used lactic acid bacteria species at present. Most developed and used L. plantarum are derived from fermented food or plant-based materials. In this study, L. plantarum was isolated from fecal samples of healthy Uyghur and Kazakh children in Yining, Xinjiang, and 20 representative strains were selected by fingerprinting to remove the identical bands. The clustering results of fingerprinting classified the strains into three major groups, and strains of the same ethnicity and age group were more likely to be clustered in the same small branch. The phylogenetic tree based on groEL gene showed that strains of the same ethnic origin tended to cluster together. At the same time, the acid and bile salt tolerance, self-aggregation, hydrophobicity (xylene), bacteriostatic capacity, antibiotic sensitivity and carbohydrate utilization ability of 20 strains were tested in vitro. The results showed that strains YLW2L-108-29, YLW2L-61-7 and YLW1L-44-7 had better acid (pH2.5) resistance, and YLW1L-44-6 had the best bile salt tolerance (0.3% concentration). Strains YLW2L-61-7, YLW2L-57-4, YLW2L-66-30 had the best self-aggregation and hydrophobics results, and all strains grew well on fructooligosaccharide, galactooligosaccharide, isomaltooligosaccharide, maltodextrin, raffinose, D-(+)-trehalose dihydrate, pectin, stachyose tetrahydrate and soybean oligosaccharide. Most strains had poor growth on inulin and resistant starch, and worst growth on xylo-oligosaccharide. Combined with the results of bacterial inhibition and antibiotic resistance, strain YLW2L-61-7 was screened as a potential probiotic strain for subsequent studies, laying the foundation for the development of excellent probiotic strains and products suitable to regional populations.
  • [1]
    RICCI A, ALLENDE A, BOLTON D, et al. Update of the list of qps-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to efsa 5:Suitability of taxonomic units notified to efsa until september 2016[J]. Efsa Journal,2017,15(3):4663−4678.
    [2]
    CEN S, YIN R, MAO B, et al. Comparative genomics shows niche-specific variations of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from human, drosophila melanogaster, vegetable and dairy sources[J]. Food Bioscience,2020,35:100581−100597. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100581
    [3]
    FILANNINO P, DE ANGELIS M, DI CAGNO R, et al. How Lactobacillus plantarum shapes its transcriptome in response to contrasting habitats[J]. Environmental Microbiology,2018,20(10):3700−3716. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14372
    [4]
    TEUSINK B, WIERSMA A, JACOBS L, et al. Understanding the adaptive growth strategy of Lactobacillus plantarum by in silico optimisation[J]. PLoS Computational Biology,2009,5(6):e1000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000410
    [5]
    SALVUCCI E, LEBLANC J G, PÉREZ G. Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material[J]. LWT,2016,70:185−191. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.043
    [6]
    YILMAZ B, BANGAR S P, ECHEGARAY N, et al. The impacts of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the functional properties of fermented foods:A review of current knowledge[J]. Microorganisms,2022,10(4):826−843. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040826
    [7]
    ARENA M P, SILVAIN A, NORMANNO G, et al. Use of Lactobacillus plantarum strains as a bio-control strategy against food-borne pathogenic microorganisms[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2016,7:464−481.
    [8]
    LI X, XU W, YANG J, et al. Effects of applying lactic acid bacteria to the fermentation on a mixture of corn steep liquor and air-dried rice straw[J]. Animal Nutrition,2016,2(3):229−233. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2016.04.003
    [9]
    MEADE E, SLATTERY M A, GARVEY M. Bacteriocins, potent antimicrobial peptides and the fight against multi drug resistant species:Resistance is futile?[J]. Antibiotics-Basel,2020,9(1):32−41. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9010032
    [10]
    YANG K M, JIANG Z Y, ZHENG C T, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on diarrhea and intestinal barrier function of young piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli K881[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(4):1496−1503. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6619
    [11]
    SAGGIORO A. Probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2004, 38(6):104-106.
    [12]
    VICARIOTTO F. Effectiveness of an association of a cranberry dry extract, d-mannose, and the two microorganisms Lactobacillus plantarum Lp01 and Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc09 in women affected by cystitis:A pilot study[J]. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology,2014,48:96−101. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a02eff
    [13]
    KAŹMIERCZAK-SIEDLECKA K, DACA A, FOLWARSKI M, et al. The role of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v in supporting treatment of selected diseases[J]. Central European Journal Of Immunology,2020,45(4):488−493. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2020.101515
    [14]
    RUDZKI L, OSTROWSKA L, PAWLAK D, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v decreases kynurenine concentration and improves cognitive functions in patients with major depression:A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study[J]. Psychoneu Roendocrinology,2019,100:213−222. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.10.010
    [15]
    ONBAS T, OSMANAGAOGLU O, KIRAN F. Potential properties of Lactobacillus plantarum F-10 as a bio-control strategy for wound infections[J]. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins,2019,11(4):1110−1123. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9486-8
    [16]
    DOUILLARD F P, DE VOS W M. Biotechnology of health-promoting bacteria[J]. Biotechnology Advances,2019,37(6):107369−107387. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.008
    [17]
    MATSUKI T, WATANABE K, FUJIMOTO J, et al. Quantitative pcr with 16s rRAN-gene-targeted species-specific primers for analysis of human intestinal Bifidobacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004, 70(1):167-173.
    [18]
    YANG B, CHEN Y, STANTON C, et al. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus composition at species level and gut microbiota diversity in infants before 6 weeks[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2019,20(13):3306. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133306
    [19]
    KAUSHIK J K, KUMAR A, DUARY R K, et al. Functional and probiotic attributes of an indigenous isolate of Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. PLoS One,2009,4(12):e8099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008099
    [20]
    SHEHATA M G, EL SOHAIMY S A, EL-SAHN M A, et al. Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity[J]. Annals of Agricultural Sciences,2016,61(1):65−75. doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2016.03.001
    [21]
    TANG W, LI C, HE Z, et al. Probiotic properties and cellular antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum Ma2 isolated from tibetan kefir grains[J]. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins,2018,10(3):523−533. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9349-8
    [22]
    MUHAMMAD Z, RAMZAN R, ABDELAZEZ A, et al. Assessment of the antimicrobial potentiality and functionality of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from the conventional inner mongolian fermented cheese against foodborne pathogens[J]. Pathogens,2019,8(2):71−87. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8020071
    [23]
    魏小晶, 周桓丞, 靳亚梅, 等. 新疆喀什地区维吾尔族婴幼儿肠道双歧杆菌遗传差异及益生特性分析[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(6):93−100. [WEI X J, ZHOU H C, JIN Y M, et al. Genetic difference and probiotic characteristics of intestinal Bifidobacterium in Uygur infants in Kashi area, Xinjiang[J]. Food Science,2020,41(6):93−100.] doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190217-083

    WEI X J, ZHOU H C, JIN Y M, et al. Genetic difference and probiotic characteristics of intestinal Bifidobacterium in Uygur infants in Kashi area, Xinjiang[J]. Food Science, 2020, 416): 93100. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190217-083
    [24]
    MALDONADO N C, SILVA D R C, CLAUDIA O M, et al. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from young calves-characterization and potential as probiotics[J]. Research in Veterinary Science,2012,92(2):342−349. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.03.017
    [25]
    VLKOVA E, RADA V, SMEHILOVA M, et al. Auto-aggregation and co-aggregation ability in Bifidobacteria and Clostridia[J]. Folia Microbiologica,2008,53(3):263−269. doi: 10.1007/s12223-008-0040-z
    [26]
    TUO Y, YU H, AI L, et al. Aggregation and adhesion properties of 22 Lactobacillus strains[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2013,96(7):4252−4257. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6547
    [27]
    SWANSON K S, GIBSON G R, HUTKINS R, et al. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the definition and scope of synbiotics[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology,2020,17(11):687−701.
    [28]
    SALMINEN S, COLLADO M C, ENDO A, et al. The international scientific association of probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology,2021,18(9):649−667.
    [29]
    王志新, 韩烁培, 王雨, 等. 植物乳杆菌的筛选、鉴定及其抑菌物质研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(9):133−138. [WANG Z X, HAN S P, WANG Y, et al. Screening, identification and antibacterial substances of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019,40(9):133−138.]

    WANG Z X, HAN S P, WANG Y, et al. Screening, identification and antibacterial substances of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 409): 133138.
    [30]
    韦珏, 刘金凤, 覃绍敏, 等. 发酵酸鱼中乳酸菌的鉴定及特性分析[J]. 中国酿造,2023,42(3):95−100. [WEI Y, LIU J F, QIN S M, et al. Identification and characteristic analysis of lactic acid bacteria in fermented fish[J]. China Brewing,2023,42(3):95−100.]

    WEI Y, LIU J F, QIN S M, et al. Identification and characteristic analysis of lactic acid bacteria in fermented fish[J]. China Brewing, 2023, 423): 95100.
    [31]
    CHOPRA I. Tetracycline antibiotics:mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance[J]. Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews,2001,65(2):232−260.
    [32]
    史梅莓, 伍亚龙, 杨恺, 等. 四川泡菜中潜在益生性植物乳杆菌的筛选及安全性评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(22):165-172. SHI M M, WU Y L, YANG K, et al. Screening and safety evaluation of potential beneficial Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Sichuan pickles [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(22):165−172.
    [33]
    JAIMEE G, HALAMI P M. Emerging resistance to aminoglycosides in lactic acid bacteria of food origin-an impending menace[J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology,2016,100(3):1137−1151.
    [34]
    MICHLMAYR H, SCHÜMANN C, KULBE KLAUS D, et al. Heterologously expressed family 51 Α-L-arabinofuranosidases from Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus brevis[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2011,77(4):1528−1531. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01385-10
  • Other Related Supplements

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 苏敏,李红丽,白亚敏,黄大亮,刘元,吴彦蕾. 基于液相色谱-串联高分辨质谱技术的食品中污染物检测技术研究进展. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2025(04): 44-52 .
    2. 张君. 我国南方部分地区蓝莓种植过程中农药残留检测结果分析. 河北农机. 2024(03): 136-138 .
    3. 张申平,秦宇,顾颖娟. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-四极杆/静电场轨道阱质谱法测定牛羊乳及其乳粉中21种兽药. 乳业科学与技术. 2024(02): 24-29 .
    4. 李红洲,国果,李博岩,梁桂娟,李志远. 超高效液相色谱-四极杆-飞行时间-高分辨质谱法分析6种李果实中的代谢物差异性. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(11): 63-73 .
    5. 刘宇航,于寒冰,杨红菊,马啸,温雅君,孙志伟,习佳林,熊慧勤,肖志勇. 高效液相色谱-四极杆-飞行时间质谱法快速筛查蔬菜中124种药物与个人护理品残留量. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(16): 175-184 .
    6. 朱春雨,吴移山,郑景娇. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鸡蛋中地克珠利、妥曲珠利及其代谢物残留量. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(16): 211-218 .
    7. 肖泳,曾小明,李政,袁列江,邓航,王淑霞,潘照. 超高效液相色谱-四极杆/静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱法测定鸡蛋中94种农药残留. 食品与发酵工业. 2024(21): 333-340 .
    8. 王颖怡,吴玉田,孟春杨,周贻兵,刘利亚. HPLC-MS/MS技术同时测定鸡蛋中5种抗球虫药. 食品工业. 2023(06): 291-294 .
    9. 李晓慧,李建洪,王洪萍,金芬. 植物源性食品中化学性危害物质的色谱-质谱检测技术研究进展. 分析测试学报. 2023(10): 1357-1369 .
    10. 周雪莼,胡婷婷,王佳慧,白静,杨颖,侯宇,张哲,张勋. 高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱法快速筛查动物源性药食同源产品中32种抗生素兽药残留. 吉林中医药. 2023(12): 1469-1474 .
    11. 范轶欧,迟英欣,杨路平,焦燕妮. 高分辨质谱技术在环境和食品风险物质非靶向筛查检测中应用的研究进展. 预防医学论坛. 2023(12): 955-960 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (96) PDF downloads (22) Cited by(11)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return