Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Colostrum and Normal Milk of Buffalo Based on 16S rDNA High-throughput Sequencing

XIE Fang; XIE Huade; TANG Zhenhua; XIE Yaofeng; GUO Yanxia; HUANG Yuhan; YANG Chengjian

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020060273

Volume 42 Issue 13

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(13): 125-132. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020060273

XIE Fang, XIE Huade, TANG Zhenhua, et al. Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Colostrum and Normal Milk of Buffalo Based on 16S rDNA High-throughput Sequencing[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(13): 125−132. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020060273.

Citation:

PDF (1518 KB)

Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Colostrum and Normal Milk of Buffalo Based on 16S rDNA High-throughput Sequencing

Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Genetics and Breeding Laboratory of Buffalo, Nanning 530001, China

More Information

Received Date: June 21, 2020
Available Online: April 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing was used to study the bacterial diversity of colostrum and normal milk of the three-breed crossbreds. Methods: The total bacterial DNA was extracted from the raw milk samples collected on the same day, the 16S rDNA of the bacteria was amplified by PCR, and the 16S rDNA library of the bacteria group was constructed by the purified amplified fragment. Miseq PE300 platform was used for sequencing and blast comparison. Results: There were 19 phyla, 292 genera and 437 species in colostrum group. 7 phyla, 203 bacterial genera and 330 bacterial species were obtained from the two groups of the normal milk group. The bacterial diversity of colostrum group was higher than that of the normal milk group. Chryseobacterium, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas were the dominant bacteria in the colostrum group, while Chryseobacterium, Lactococcus, and Enterococcus were the dominant bacteria in the normal group. Cluster analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups. PCA and PLS-DA analysis showed that there were significant differences in bacterial flora structure between the two groups. Conclusion: The diversity of colostrum and normal milk of the three-breed crossbreds is rich, and the bacterial diversity in normal milk group is significantly higher than that in colostrum group.
- 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing,
- raw buffalo milk,
- colostrum,
- bacterial diversity

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	杨炳壮. 全球水牛业发展现状与我国奶水牛业的发展趋势[J]. 广西农学报,2011,26(1):40−48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4374.2011.01.013
[2]	Kundu S S, Kushwaha B P, Maity S B. Milk composition of Bhadawari buffaloes[J]. Indan J Anin Sci,2007,77(12):1330−1333.
[3]	谢芳, 杨承剑, 杨小梅, 等. 水牛乳中可培养乳酸菌多样性分析[J]. 中国酿造,2017,36(2):119−122. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2017.02.026
[4]	柯耀波. 广西水牛奶产业发展对策[J]. 广西大学学报, 2010, 32(1): 232−239.
[5]	Munblit D, Treneva M, Peroni D G, et al. Colostrum and mature human milk of women from London, Moscow, and Verona: Determinants of Immune Composition[J]. Nutrients, 2016, 38(8): 695−671.
[6]	Masoud W, Takamiya M, Vogensen F K, et al. Characterization of bacterial populations in Danish raw milk cheeses made with different starter cultures by denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis and pyrosequencing[J]. INT DAIRY J,2011,21(3):142−148. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.10.007
[7]	Huck J R, Hammond B H, Murphy S C, et al. Tracking spore-forming bacterial contaminants in fluid milk-processing systems[J]. J Dairy SCI,2007,90(10):4872−4883. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0196
[8]	Rasolofo E A, St-gelais D, Lapointe G, et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial population structure and dynamics during cold storage of untreated and treated milk[J]. Int J Food Microbiol,2010,138(1):109−116.
[9]	冯疆蓉, 李春杰. 生鲜乳有害微生物污染与危害分析[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(9):1875−1876.
[10]	李引强, 朱宝利, 吴俊, 等. 16S rRNA的分子生物学方法分析牛奶中的细菌菌群[J]. 食品科学,2013,34(20):255−257.
[11]	Maslowski K M, Vieira A T, Ng A, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43[J]. Nature,2009,461(7268):1282−1286. doi: 10.1038/nature08530
[12]	许颖, 马德胜, 宋文枫, 等. 采用16S rDNA高通量测序技术分析油藏微生物多样性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2016,.22(3):411−412.
[13]	李俊锋. 基于16S rRNA和宏基因组高通量测序的微生物多样性研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015.
[14]	张敏爱, 张建军, 王子亮, 等. 16S rDNA克隆文库法分析生鲜牛乳中细菌种群的多样性[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2014,5(10):3170−3176.
[15]	谢萍, 徐明生, 尹忠平, 等. MiSeq测序研究散装酱卤鸭肉贮藏期间微生物群落多样性[J]. 现代食品科技,2015,31(11):120−123.
[16]	王格, 董胜奇, 张涛, 等. 基于高通量测序分析豆粕发酵过程中细菌群落结构及多样性[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2018,37(5):91−92.
[17]	席晓敏. 乳房炎牛乳中微生物多样性及代谢组学研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2016.
[18]	吕成龙, 田雨, 陈芳慧, 等. 采用16S rRNA高通量测序技术分析鲜奶中微生物的多样性[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2020,43(2):333−335.
[19]	于国萍, 陈媛, 姚宇秀, 等. 利用Illumina MiSeq高通量测序技术分析原料乳的菌群分布[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(16):188−189.
[20]	贺成虎, 赵海珍, 陆兆新, 等. 高通量测序分析麦麸发酵过程中微生物群落结构的变化[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(24):102−109.
[21]	洪庆. 基于代谢组学的车叶草苷抗衰老作用评价及机制研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019.
[22]	吴燕燕, 徐伟芳, 罗琴, 等. Illumina MiSeq高通量测序分析不同品种桑树内生细菌多样性[J]. 蚕学通讯,2018,38(3):1−10.
[23]	黄卫强. 中国四个地区人母乳中微生物多样性研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2015.
[24]	Mazmanian S K, Kasper D L. The love–hate relationship between bacterial polysaccharides and the host immune system[J]. Nature Reviews Immunology,2006,6(11):849−858. doi: 10.1038/nri1956
[25]	Yang H, Halasz A, Zhao J, et al. Experimental evidence for in situ natural attenuation of 2, 4- and 2, 6-dinitrotoluene in marine sediment[J]. Chemosphere,2008,70(5):791−799. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.014
[26]	Klausen J, Ranke J, Schwarzenbach R P, et al. Influence of solution composition and column aging on the reduction of nitroaromatic compounds by zero-valent iron[J]. Chemosphere,2001,44(4):511−517. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00385-4
[27]	Catozzi C, Bonastre A S, Francino O, et al. The microbiota of water buffalo milk during mastitis[J]. Plos One,2017,12(9):e0184710.
[28]	孙颖浩, 翁铁慧, 陈锦华主编. 城市核化生爆医学救援指南[M]. 上海: 第二军医大学出版社, 2014: 355.
[29]	王刚. 炭疽病研究进展[J]. 西南国防医药,2003(3):335−336. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2003.03.065
[30]	Bhattarai D, Dad R, Worku T, et al. The functions and mechanisms of sequence differences of DGAT1 gene on milk fat synthesis between dairy cow and buffalo[J]. J Dairy Res, 2020, 87(2): 170−174.
[31]	Quigley L, Osullivan O, Stanton C, et al. The complex microbiota of raw milk[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews,2013,37(5):664−698. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12030
[32]	Sharma A, Sindhu N. Occurrence of clinical and subclinical mastitis in buffaloes in the State of Haryana (India)[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science,2007:965−967.
[33]	Vacheyrou M, Normand A, Guyot P, et al. Cultivable microbial communities in raw cow milk and potential transfers from stables of sixteen French farms[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology,2011,146(3):253−262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.033

[1]	HUANG Minghao, HUANG Taiqi, DENG Lijuan. Optimization of Solanum lyratum Crude Polysaccharide Extraction Process Using Response Surface Methodology and Analysis ofIts In Vitro Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 219-225. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023040182
[2]	WANG Yan, DUAN Xuewei, ZHANG Minjun, YANG Huiwen, LIU Bing, YOU Tianhui. Optimization of Extraction Process of Polysaccharide from Black Corn Kernel by Response Surface Method and Analysis of Its Antioxidant Activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 191-200. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023020118
[3]	Liming ZHAO, Xuyao GUO, Yingmin MAO, Daqing ZHAO, Baotai HUANG, Jiaqi LI, Li LIU, Bin QI. Optimization of Extraction Process and Antioxidant Activity of Polysaccharide from Panax quinquefolium Fruit by Response Surface Methodology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(13): 160-166. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070318
[4]	MO Yi-fan, YAO Ling-yun, FENG Tao, SONG Shi-qing, SUN Min. Optimization of Flash Extraction Process of Total Flavonoids from Fig (Ficus carica L.) and Its Antioxidant Activities[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(12): 186-191,220. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.12.030
[5]	XU Hai-tang, LIAO Hua-zhen, ZHAO Yan-zhi, ZHANG Jin-yan, ZHOU Ju-ying. Optimization Extraction of Polysaccharide from Sophora tonkinensis Gagnep by Response Surface Methodology and Its Antioxidant Activity of Fractionated Alcohol Precipitation Components[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(22): 157-162. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.22.028
[6]	JIA Fu-huai, TU Hong-jian, WANG Jun, TAO Gang, JI Cun-rui, WANG Cai-xia, XIONG Fei-fei, YAN Yong-qiu. Optimization of Ultrasonic-Flash Synergistic Extraction and Antitumor Activity of Polysaccharide from Fibrous Root of Bletilla striata[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(20): 188-195,208. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.20.030
[7]	DU Hong-xia, TAO Jin-qiang, WANG Xiang, LIU Yan-xiu, YU Xuan. Response surface optimized extraction of flavonoids from ginseng flower and antioxidant activities[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(12): 216-221,230. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.12.038
[8]	SHI Xuan, CHENG Xiao-qing, YANG Yong, TAN Hong-jun, LIANG Xu-ming, SHI Wen-juan, SU Zhi-min. Optimization the extraction process of polysaccharide by response surface methodology from the Tremella fuciformis pedicel and its antioxidant activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (02): 297-301. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.02.049
[9]	GONG Jian. Study on the optimization of enzymatic extraction technology of polysaccharide from Camellia japonica L.by response surface methodology and investigation on its antioxidant activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (17): 197-201. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.17.031
[10]	KE Chun-lin, LI Zuo-mei, LU Bin-yu, QIAN Shi-quan, ZHANG Bin, YUAN Jing. Study on optimization of extraction conditions for polysaccharide from pomegranate flowers and its antioxidant activities[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (08): 286-289. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.08.051