Analysis of Nutritional Components and Evaluation of Protein Nutritional Value of Three Kinds of Gelatinous Edible Fungi in Yunnan

LUO Xiaoli; ZHANG Shasha; CAO Jingjing; ZHANG Weisi

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090143

Volume 42 Issue 14

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(14): 328-333. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090143

LUO Xiaoli, ZHANG Shasha, CAO Jingjing, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Evaluation of Protein Nutritional Value of Three Kinds of Gelatinous Edible Fungi in Yunnan[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(14): 328−333. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090143.

Citation:

PDF (652 KB)

Analysis of Nutritional Components and Evaluation of Protein Nutritional Value of Three Kinds of Gelatinous Edible Fungi in Yunnan

Kunming Edible Fungi Institute, All China Federation of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives, Kunming 650221, China

More Information

Received Date: September 14, 2020
Available Online: May 23, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to distinguish the differences of nutrition, and provide basis for the nutritional value research and exploring and utilizing of glial edible fungi, the contents of basic nutrients, minerals and amino acids in T. aurantialba, T. fuciformis and A. heimuer from Yunnan Province were determined by the methods of Kjeldahl, Soxhlet extraction and AAS, etc., the nutritional value of protein was evaluated by amino acid ratio coefficient method. The results showed that there were differences in the contents of basic nutrients among the three kinds of edible fungi. The highest content of total sugar was 75.30% in T. aurantiaba, the highest content of ash was 6.40 g/100 g in T. fuciformis and the highest content of crude protein and crude fiber were 11.20 and 9.70 g/100 g in A. heimuer. The three kinds of gelatinous edible fungi all contained Ca, K, Na, Mg, Fe, Zn, etc., but there were great differences in the content. A. heimuer had the highest contents of Ca, Mg, Fe. While T. fuciformis had the highest contents of K, Na, Zn. There were 17 kinds of amino acids in the three kinds of gelatinous edible fungi, including 7 kinds of essential amino acids for human body. The contents of glutamic acid, aspartic acid and other delicious amino acids were higher than amino acid pattern spectrum suggested by FAO/WHO. The SRC values of three kinds of gelatinous edible fungi from high to low were T. fuciformis (82.25)>A. heimuer (78.09)>T. aurantialba (77.98), with high nutritional value and utilization rate. There was no significant difference in protein nutritional value among the three kinds of edible fungi. All of them contained high protein, low fat, high fiber and high total sugar content, which had high nutritional value and development prospect.
- gelatinous edible fungi,
- nutritional components,
- protein,
- amino acids,
- nutritional value evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (43)

References

[1]	曹玉春, 包海鹰, 图力古尔, 等. 用GC-MS方法对四种药用胶质菌化学成分进行比较分析[J]. 菌物学报,2017,36(12):1674−1685.
[2]	桂明英, 马绍宾, 郭相. 西南大型真菌[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术文献出版社, 2016: 237.
[3]	李玉, 李泰辉, 杨祝良, 等. 中国大型菌物资源图鉴[M]. 郑州: 中原农民出版社, 2015: 229.
[4]	陈冉静. 银耳功能性食品生产工艺及生物活性研究[D]. 成都: 西华大学, 2015.
[5]	张光亚. 中国常见食用菌图谱[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1999: 19−20.
[6]	Kiho T, Morimoto H, Usui S, et al. Antidiabetic effect of an acidic polysaccharide(TAP) from Tremella aurantia and its degradation product(TAP-H)[J]. Biological andarmaceutical Bulletin,2001,24(12):1400−1403. doi: 10.1248/bpb.24.1400
[7]	Kiho T, Morimoto H, Kobayashi T, et al. Effect of a polysaccharide from the bodies of Tremella aurantia glucose metabolism in mouse live[J]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,2000,64:417−419. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.417
[8]	Deng Y X, Qu W J. In vitro antioxidant function of extracellular polysaccharides from Tremella aurantialba[J]. Acta Edulis Fungi,2007,14(3):50−52.
[9]	Chen B. Optimization of extraction of Tremella fuciformis polysaccharides and its antioxidant and antitumour activities in vitro[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2010,81(2):420−424. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.039
[10]	Wang X M, Zhang Z S, Zhao M X. Carboxymethylation of polysaccharides from Tremella fuciformis for antioxidant and moisture-preserving activities[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2015,72:526−530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.045
[11]	Jiang R Z, Wang Y, Luo H M, et al. Effect of the molecular mass of tremella polysaccharides on accelerated recovery from cyclophosphamide-induced leucopenia in rats[J]. Molecules,2012,17(4):3609−3617. doi: 10.3390/molecules17043609
[12]	Khaskheli S G, Wen Z, Sheikh S A, et al. Characterization of Auricularia auricula polysaccharides and its antioxidant properties in fresh and pickled product[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2015,81:387−395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.020
[13]	Ma Z C, Wang J G, Zhang L, et al. Evaluation of water soluble β-D-glucan from Auricularia auricular-judae as potential anti-tumor agent[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2010,80(3):977−983. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.015
[14]	Lu A X, Yu M G, Shen M, et al. Preparation of the Auricularia auricular polysaccharides simulated hydrolysates and their hypoglycaemic effect[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2017,106:1139−1145.
[15]	熊丙全, 兰秀华, 彭卫红, 等. 不同羊肚菌氨基酸比较分析及营养评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020,46(2):114−119.
[16]	李治平, 刘娟汝, 陈艳, 等. 不同产地香菇氨基酸组成及营养价值评价[J]. 保鲜与加工,2020,20(3):167−172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2020.03.026
[17]	李淑荣, 王丽, 倪淑君, 等. 大球盖菇不同部位氨基酸含量测定及营养评价[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(8):95−99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2017.08.021
[18]	朱燕华, 王倩, 陈明杰, 等. 不同采摘期的双孢蘑菇子实体蛋白质营养评价[J]. 上海农业学报,2016,32(4):29−34.
[19]	彭裕红. 段木黑木耳与代料黑木耳产品质构分析与营养评价[J]. 中国食用菌,2019,38(3):50−56, 60.
[20]	张春霞, 何明霞, 刘静, 等. 暗褐网柄牛肝菌人工、半人工与野生子实体营养成分对比[J]. 西南农业学报,2014,27(6):2497−2500.
[21]	柴美清, 李青, 韩鹏远, 等. 不同栽培基质对香菇头潮菇产量及子实体营养成分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2017(15):76−79. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16060012
[22]	蔡东联, 糜漫天. 营养师必读(第3版)[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2014: 33.
[23]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准食品中水分的测定: GB 5009.3-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[24]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准食品中灰分的测定: GB 5009.4-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[25]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 食用菌中总糖含量的测定: GB/T 15672-2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[26]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定: GB 5009.5-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[27]	中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 植物类食品中粗纤维的测定: GB/T 5009.10-2003[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
[28]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定: GB 5009.6-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[29]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中钙的测定: GB 5009.92-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[30]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中钾、钠的测定: GB 5009.91-2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[31]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中镁的测定: GB 5009.241-2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[32]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中铁的测定: GB 5009.90-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[33]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中锌的测定: GB 5009.14-2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[34]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中氨基酸的测定: GB 5009.124-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[35]	朱圣陶, 吴坤. 蛋白质营养价值评价-氨基酸比值系数法[J]. 营养学报,1998,10(2):187−190.
[36]	FAO/WHO Ad Hoe Expert Committee. Energy and protein requirements[M]. Rome: FAO Nutrition Meeting Report Series, 1973: 52.
[37]	李瑞雪, 汪泰初, 王钰婷, 等. 3种黑木耳营养成分比较分析[J]. 农学学报,2018,8(3):48−52.
[38]	刘文贺, 苏玲, 王琦. 不同产区黑木耳中营养成分比较分析[J]. 北方园艺,2020(5):121−128.
[39]	姚清华, 颜孙安, 陈美珍, 等. 古田银耳主栽品种基本营养分析与评价[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(7):1896−1902. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2019.07.025
[40]	马涛, 张李躬, 林钊, 等. 不同银耳产品主要营养成分分析与评估[J]. 中国食用菌,2019,38(11):57−60.
[41]	谢红, 刘春卉, 苏槟楠, 等. 金耳8254的营养价值和药理研究[J]. 中国食用菌,2000,19(6):39−41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8310.2000.06.022
[42]	Yang J H, Lin H C, Mau J L. Non-volatile taste components of several commercial mushrooms[J]. Food Chemistry,2001,73(4):461−466. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00330-7
[43]	杨旭昆, 汪禄祥, 叶艳萍, 等. 7种云南产核桃中17种氨基酸含量测定与必需氨基酸模式分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2020,11(6):1889−1894.

[1]	SHENG Jinfeng, LEI Yawen, WANG Xuefeng, LI Li, XIN Ming, YE Dongqing, YAN Cailing, LING Dongning. Processing Optimization of Low-temperature Vacuum Fried Persimmon Chips and Quality Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(2): 152-160. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022120019
[2]	GUO Rongxiang, LI Junjian, HUANG Siyuan, LI Pan, DU Bing. Effects of Sugar Infiltration Processes on the Quality of Lactic Acid Fermented Orange Peels Preserved Fruit[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(15): 101-107. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022090206
[3]	WANG Dan, JIANG Chunyang, DENG Qiaosheng, YANG Qin, ZHOU Nong. Process Optimization and Quality Analysis of Lycopus lucidus Fermented Wine[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(6): 235-243. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022060210
[4]	HAN Ying, WANG Qian, HOU Chenzi, BU Xianpan, TANG Dejian, ZHAO Yu. Optimization of Fermentation Process and Quality Analysis of Buckwheat Vinegar Fermented by Kombucha[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(16): 167-175. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100158
[5]	ZHANG Jun, GU Fudie, LIU Yan, ZHOU Yu, LIU Qingmei, LIU Guangming. Optimization Preparation and Property Analysis of Sulfate Polysaccharide from Eucheuma spinosum by Probiotic Fermentation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(11): 175-184. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090160
[6]	CHANG Jiale, ZHANG Ting, YUAN Yahong, YUE Tianli. Optimization of Fermentation Process and Evaluation of Quality and Flavor of Quinoa Yogurt Produced by Mixed Lactic Acid Bacteria[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(18): 197-208. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021010136
[7]	LIU Fei, LI Wen-hui, DING Zhen-zhen, REN Xiao-na, ZHENG Xiao-ji. Process Optimization and Flavor Analysis of Xinjiang Characteristic Fermented Milk Tablet[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(20): 209-214,222. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.20.033
[8]	ZHAO Hui, XUE Bing-ying, JIA Cai-hua, ZHANG Bin-jia, NIU Meng, ZHAO Si-ming, XIONG Shan-bai, LIN Qin-lu. Formulation Optimization and Storage Quality Change of Rice Milk Fermented by Compound Bacteria[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(6): 223-229. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.06.037
[9]	WANG Wei, WU Yun, GU Li-nazi, ZHANG Ya-nan, WU Hao-tian, TIAN Ge, HUA Yu. Fermentation control optimization and quality analysis of mare's milk beer based on Simplex algorithm[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (04): 191-196. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.04.028
[10]	黄刺玫叶片中黄酮物质的提取和分析[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 1999, (05): 14-15. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.1999.05.003

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	尹燕，李霞，李永才，王毅，冯炜弘，王筱姝，牛慧婷，李爱兵，王程. 不同热风干燥方式对兰州百合品质的影响. 保鲜与加工. 2025(02): 99-105 .
2.	李改莲，韩琭丛，王广红，彭钰航，金听祥. 胡萝卜热泵干燥特性及动力学模型分析. 包装工程. 2024(01): 10-18 .
3.	徐柳风，王学成，易兵，刘振峰，伍振峰，杨明. 中药材保质增效干燥预处理技术的研究现状、问题及对策. 中国医药工业杂志. 2024(04): 463-474 .
4.	尹燕，李霞，李永才，王毅，冯炜弘，牛慧婷，李爱兵，刘娜娜. 微波-热风联合干燥方法对兰州百合品质的影响. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(10): 304-312 .
5.	颜月玲，李芷瑶，文有青，于瑶，王海霞. 不同贮藏温度下鲜百合关键质量属性研究及保质期预测. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(15): 83-92 .
6.	王栋，赵一凡，邓志宁，孙浩媛，王勇，袁越锦. 烫漂预处理对苹果干燥过程中微观结构及质构品质的影响. 食品科学. 2024(22): 207-218 .
7.	王莹，吴立国，孙丽萍，周宏举，周桓宇. 基于Weibull函数的平贝母热风干燥特性. 农机化研究. 2022(05): 249-254 .
8.	金听祥，王广红，彭钰航，马瑜聪，张盼，曹泷. 不同预处理方式对胡萝卜热泵干燥品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2022(07): 173-178 .
9.	刘鹤，焦俊华，田友，刘佳敖，王燕令，吴学红. 马铃薯片热风干燥特性及收缩动力学模型. 食品工业科技. 2022(11): 58-64 . 本站查看

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (385) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(15)

Science and Technology of Food Industry

Analysis of Nutritional Components and Evaluation of Protein Nutritional Value of Three Kinds of Gelatinous Edible Fungi in Yunnan