SHAO Xupeng, LI Meihua, SHEN Qi, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(13): 358−365. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090009.
Citation: SHAO Xupeng, LI Meihua, SHEN Qi, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(13): 358−365. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090009.

Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang

More Information
  • Received Date: September 02, 2020
  • Available Online: May 10, 2021
  • The mature fruits of 8 melon varieties grown in Turpan, Xinjiang (Nasmi, Huamei, Weifang No. 5, Weifang No. 8, Xizhou Mi No. 17, Xizhou Mi No. 25, BixieKexin and Junxiu) were used as test materials. By measuring the main nutritional quality indicators and functional activity indicators, the quality of melon fruit was compared and comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that there were obvious differences in the fruit quality of the 8 different varieties of melons. Nasmi had higher content of vitamin C, soluble solids, soluble protein, sucrose, fructose, and glucose; the flesh of Huamei is hard, and wide thickness and high fruit shape index; the two melons of the flavor series had high flavonoid content, DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging rate than other melons; Junxiu had the highest single fruit weight and the lowest vitamin C content; other varieties of melons had the average content. Principal component analysis showed that the quality of melon fruit could be evaluated by four factors. The content of soluble solids, vitamin C, total phenols, ABTS free radical scavenging rate, citric acid, glucose, fructose, glucose and fruit shape index could be used as An important index for the evaluation of its nutritional value; through cluster analysis, 8 different varieties of melons are divided into 4 categories, the first category was ‘Flavor 8’ and ‘Flavor 5’, which had a sweet and sour flavor; the second category was ‘Xizhou Mi No. 17’, ‘Xizhou Mi No. 25’, ‘BixieKexin’ and ‘Nasmi’, which had high nutritional value; the third category was ‘Huamei’, with the best fruit shape index; The fourth category was ‘Junxiu’, and its weight per fruit had obvious advantages compared with other varieties.The comprehensive evaluation showed that ‘Nasimmi’ had the best fruit quality, ‘Xizhou Mi 25’, ‘Hua Mei’, ‘Flavour No. 5’ and ‘BixieKexin’ were better, and the other varieties were of poor quality.
  • [1]
    郭小鸥. 薄皮甜瓜果实成熟品质形成与蛋白质组学分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
    [2]
    古娜斯·叶尔肯, 魏征, 王豪杰, 等. 新疆地区栽培5种甜瓜营养成分比较分析[J]. 食品研究与开发,2019,40(6):115−119, 125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.06.021
    [3]
    刘文君, 齐秀玲, 高忠奎, 等. 厚皮甜瓜营养物质含量差异性和综合营养品质分析[J]. 北方园艺,2014(17):34−36.
    [4]
    盛云燕, 韩雨, 王霞. 不同甜瓜品种果实品质差异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(19):8097−8099. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.19.008
    [5]
    陈年来, 胡敏, 代春艳, 等. 诱抗处理对甜瓜叶片酚类物质代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2010,37(11):1759−1766.
    [6]
    Ning M, Tang F, Zhang Q, et al. The quality of Gold Queen Hami melons stored under different temperatures[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,243:140−147. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.005
    [7]
    Basharat Yousuf, Abhaya Kumar Srivastava, Saghir Ahmad. Application of natural fruit extract and hydrocolloid-based coating to retain quality of fresh-cut melon[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2020,57(10):1−12.
    [8]
    张光伟. 不同嫁接法对厚皮甜瓜生长发育及生理特性的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
    [9]
    Ma. del Rosario A J, Isidro E V, Rafael G M, et al. Development, yield, and quality of melon fruit (Cucumis melo L.) inoculated with mexican native strains of Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg)[J]. Agrociencia,2018,52(1):91−102.
    [10]
    Nascimento C W, Nunes G H, Preston H A, et al. Influence of silicon fertilization on nutrient accumulation, yield and fruit quality of melon grown in Northeastern Brazil[J]. Silicon,2020,12(4):937−943. doi: 10.1007/s12633-019-00187-5
    [11]
    王佳豪, 段雅倩, 乜兰春, 等. ‘羊角脆’类甜瓜果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(24):4582−4591. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.24.012
    [12]
    潘好斌, 刘东, 邵青旭, 等.不同品种薄皮甜瓜成熟期果实质地品质分析及综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(21): 35-42.
    [13]
    黄倩, 杭吟溪, 刘中华, 等. 北京地区不同品种甜瓜营养品质分析[J]. 北京农学院学报,2018,33(3):40−43.
    [14]
    胡国智, 熊韬, 冯炯鑫, 等. 施肥对甜瓜风味物质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(2):93−98. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2020.02.13
    [15]
    曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007.
    [16]
    Larrauri J A, Sanchezmoreno A C, Sauracalixto F, et al. Effect of temperature on the free radical scavenging capacity of extracts from red and white grape pomace peels[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1998,46(7):2694−2697. doi: 10.1021/jf980017p
    [17]
    刘伟, 张群, 李志坚, 等. 不同品种黄花菜游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学,2019,40(10):243−250. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180523-336
    [18]
    程婷婷, 惠小涵, 尚欣欣, 等. 10个产地莲藕营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J/OL]. 食品工业科技: 1−9[2020-10-15]. https: //doi. org/10.13386/j. issn1002-0306.2020060110.
    [19]
    乔健, 马智玲, 魏长宾, 等. 湛江地区不同桑葚品种的品质比较[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(12):264−268,290.
    [20]
    Huang Y, Li W, Zhao L, et al. Melon fruit sugar and amino acid contents are affected by fruit setting method under protected cultivation[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2017,214:288−294. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.055
    [21]
    Alam M K, Sams S, Rana Z H, et al. Minerals, vitamin C, and effect of thermal processing on carotenoids composition in nine varieties orange-fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2020,92:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103582
    [22]
    Hu Z Q, Wang H C, Hu G B, et al. Measurement of sugars, organic acids and vitamin C in litchi fruit by high per-formance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2005,93(4):89−93.
    [23]
    何伟忠, 韦凯丽, 华震宇, 等. 不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及评价指标[J]. 新疆农业科学,2019,56(9):1652−1658.
    [24]
    黄月琼, 邓文, 李谈潇. 不同品种哈密瓜果实品质研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2015,46(1):41−46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2015.01.007
    [25]
    张敬敬, 李冰, 高秀瑞, 等. 河北省不同厚皮甜瓜品种的品质测定与综合评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2018(4):116−118.
    [26]
    Lu Y, Guo S, Zhang F, et al. Comparison of functional components and antioxidant activity ofLycium barbarum L. fruits from different regions in China[J]. Molecules,2019,24(12):2228. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122228
    [27]
    Palmeri R, Parafati L, Arena E, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of semi-processed frozen prickly pear juice as affected by cultivar and harvest time[J]. Foods,2020,9(2).
    [28]
    王乐乐. 32份甜瓜种质主要品质性状评价分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Lijing, HUA Yufei, ZHANG Caimeng, KONG Xiangzhen, LI Xingfei, CHEN Yeming. Effects of Protein Content on the Texture, Rheological Properties and Microstructure of Stirred Soy Yogurt[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(24): 118-124. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024030054
    [2]ZHAO Xiao, DU Kun, ZHANG Yuan. Effect of Inulin on the Texture, Rheological Properties, and Microstructure of Synbiotic Yogurt[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(1): 72-77. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030241
    [3]LIU Ran, ZENG Qinghua, LIANG Ming, WANG Lei, CHENG Shuang. Effects of Xanthan Gum on Rheological Properties and Microstructure of Soy Protein Isolate Gel[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(4): 65-72. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021060103
    [4]HUANG Yan-ling, REN Hao-tian. Effect of Spray Drying Temperature on Microstructure of Enzyme-assisted Aqueous Extraction Soybean Concentrated Protein Powder[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(24): 50-54. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020030225
    [5]QI Ming-ming, GUO Peng, WANG Chen-jie, DONG Shuang, MA Cheng-ye. Research Progress of the Effects of Extrusion on Microstructure and Physicochemical Properties of Starch[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(5): 305-310. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.05.050
    [6]ZHANG Xiao-hong, WAN Zhong-min, SUN Jun, CHEN Pei-dong, LIU Bing. Effect of microwave treatment on RVA spectrum characteristic values and microstructure of rice[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (12): 87-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.12.016
    [7]JIANG Yuan-yuan, YING Tie-jin. Research of additives on texture property and microstructure of Yuba[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (08): 300-305. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.08.050
    [8]XU Jing-bing, WANG Ren, YU Qiu-sheng, FENG Wei, WANG Li, LUO Xiao-hu, LI Ya-nan, ZHANG Ming-wei, CHEN Zheng-xing. Effect of protein content on the microstructure and functional properties of indica rice flour[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (17): 59-63. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.17.003
    [9]Effects of spice extract on the textural properties and microstructure of beef balls during frozen storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (16): 300-303. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.16.050
    [10]Research progress in improvement of gel strength of gelatin based on microstructure[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (13): 395-399. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.13.085
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 杜鑫,易珊珊,何家国,覃明丽,苏旭,陈绍辉,蒋金芳. 快速滤过型净化结合超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定茶叶中5种农药残留量. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 54-60 .
    2. 王瑞琛,张婷,伏广想,陈冠涛. 荧光碳量子点传感器检测食品中农药残留的研究进展. 中国食品添加剂. 2024(04): 295-299 .
    3. 彭汝林,刘媛媛,李海波,杜业刚,罗淙岚,朱雨田. 液相色谱-串联三重四极杆质谱仪快速测定鱼腥草中152种农药残留. 粮食与油脂. 2024(12): 154-162 .
    4. 袁列江,王秀,李政,朱礼,邓航. 快速滤过型净化法结合超高效液相色谱串联质谱法测定动物源性食品中四唑虫酰胺残留. 食品与机械. 2024(10): 46-52 .
    5. 程似锦,李恒,谢裕. UPLC-MS/MS法测定加味藿香正气丸中29种禁用农药残留. 广东化工. 2023(18): 159-164 .
    6. 杜鑫,何家国,易珊珊,陈绍辉. 快速滤过型净化结合超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定茶叶中氟虫腈及其代谢物残留量. 农药科学与管理. 2023(11): 35-44 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (600) PDF downloads (29) Cited by(7)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return