Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang

SHAO Xupeng; LI Meihua; SHEN Qi; FAN Yingying; FANG Xiaotong; WANG Cheng; LIU Fengjuan

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090009

Volume 42 Issue 13

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(13): 358-365. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090009

SHAO Xupeng, LI Meihua, SHEN Qi, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(13): 358−365. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020090009.

Citation:

PDF (839 KB)

Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Different Varieties of Muskmelon in Turpan, Xinjiang

SHAO Xupeng^{1, 2, 3, 4,},
LI Meihua⁵,
SHEN Qi^{1, 2, 3, 4},
FAN Yingying^{1, 2, 3},
FANG Xiaotong^{1, 2, 3, 4},
WANG Cheng^{2, 3, 6, ,},
LIU Fengjuan^{1, 2, 3, 4, ,}

1.
Institute of Agricultural Quality Standard and Testing Technology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2.
Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment of Agricultural Products of Rural Ministry of Agriculture, Urumqi 830091, China
3.
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products, Urumqi 830091, China
4.
College of Food Science and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
5.
The Research Center of Hami-melon, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
6.
Administration of Scientific Research, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

More Information

Received Date: September 02, 2020
Available Online: May 10, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The mature fruits of 8 melon varieties grown in Turpan, Xinjiang (Nasmi, Huamei, Weifang No. 5, Weifang No. 8, Xizhou Mi No. 17, Xizhou Mi No. 25, BixieKexin and Junxiu) were used as test materials. By measuring the main nutritional quality indicators and functional activity indicators, the quality of melon fruit was compared and comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that there were obvious differences in the fruit quality of the 8 different varieties of melons. Nasmi had higher content of vitamin C, soluble solids, soluble protein, sucrose, fructose, and glucose; the flesh of Huamei is hard, and wide thickness and high fruit shape index; the two melons of the flavor series had high flavonoid content, DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging rate than other melons; Junxiu had the highest single fruit weight and the lowest vitamin C content; other varieties of melons had the average content. Principal component analysis showed that the quality of melon fruit could be evaluated by four factors. The content of soluble solids, vitamin C, total phenols, ABTS free radical scavenging rate, citric acid, glucose, fructose, glucose and fruit shape index could be used as An important index for the evaluation of its nutritional value; through cluster analysis, 8 different varieties of melons are divided into 4 categories, the first category was ‘Flavor 8’ and ‘Flavor 5’, which had a sweet and sour flavor; the second category was ‘Xizhou Mi No. 17’, ‘Xizhou Mi No. 25’, ‘BixieKexin’ and ‘Nasmi’, which had high nutritional value; the third category was ‘Huamei’, with the best fruit shape index; The fourth category was ‘Junxiu’, and its weight per fruit had obvious advantages compared with other varieties.The comprehensive evaluation showed that ‘Nasimmi’ had the best fruit quality, ‘Xizhou Mi 25’, ‘Hua Mei’, ‘Flavour No. 5’ and ‘BixieKexin’ were better, and the other varieties were of poor quality.
- melon,
- nutritional quality,
- principal component analysis,
- cluster analysis,
- different species

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	郭小鸥. 薄皮甜瓜果实成熟品质形成与蛋白质组学分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
[2]	古娜斯·叶尔肯, 魏征, 王豪杰, 等. 新疆地区栽培5种甜瓜营养成分比较分析[J]. 食品研究与开发,2019,40(6):115−119, 125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.06.021
[3]	刘文君, 齐秀玲, 高忠奎, 等. 厚皮甜瓜营养物质含量差异性和综合营养品质分析[J]. 北方园艺,2014(17):34−36.
[4]	盛云燕, 韩雨, 王霞. 不同甜瓜品种果实品质差异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(19):8097−8099. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.19.008
[5]	陈年来, 胡敏, 代春艳, 等. 诱抗处理对甜瓜叶片酚类物质代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2010,37(11):1759−1766.
[6]	Ning M, Tang F, Zhang Q, et al. The quality of Gold Queen Hami melons stored under different temperatures[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,243:140−147. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.005
[7]	Basharat Yousuf, Abhaya Kumar Srivastava, Saghir Ahmad. Application of natural fruit extract and hydrocolloid-based coating to retain quality of fresh-cut melon[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2020,57(10):1−12.
[8]	张光伟. 不同嫁接法对厚皮甜瓜生长发育及生理特性的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
[9]	Ma. del Rosario A J, Isidro E V, Rafael G M, et al. Development, yield, and quality of melon fruit (Cucumis melo L.) inoculated with mexican native strains of Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg)[J]. Agrociencia,2018,52(1):91−102.
[10]	Nascimento C W, Nunes G H, Preston H A, et al. Influence of silicon fertilization on nutrient accumulation, yield and fruit quality of melon grown in Northeastern Brazil[J]. Silicon,2020,12(4):937−943. doi: 10.1007/s12633-019-00187-5
[11]	王佳豪, 段雅倩, 乜兰春, 等. ‘羊角脆’类甜瓜果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(24):4582−4591. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.24.012
[12]	潘好斌, 刘东, 邵青旭, 等.不同品种薄皮甜瓜成熟期果实质地品质分析及综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(21): 35-42.
[13]	黄倩, 杭吟溪, 刘中华, 等. 北京地区不同品种甜瓜营养品质分析[J]. 北京农学院学报,2018,33(3):40−43.
[14]	胡国智, 熊韬, 冯炯鑫, 等. 施肥对甜瓜风味物质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(2):93−98. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2020.02.13
[15]	曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007.
[16]	Larrauri J A, Sanchezmoreno A C, Sauracalixto F, et al. Effect of temperature on the free radical scavenging capacity of extracts from red and white grape pomace peels[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1998,46(7):2694−2697. doi: 10.1021/jf980017p
[17]	刘伟, 张群, 李志坚, 等. 不同品种黄花菜游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学,2019,40(10):243−250. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180523-336
[18]	程婷婷, 惠小涵, 尚欣欣, 等. 10个产地莲藕营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J/OL]. 食品工业科技: 1−9[2020-10-15]. https: //doi. org/10.13386/j. issn1002-0306.2020060110.
[19]	乔健, 马智玲, 魏长宾, 等. 湛江地区不同桑葚品种的品质比较[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(12):264−268,290.
[20]	Huang Y, Li W, Zhao L, et al. Melon fruit sugar and amino acid contents are affected by fruit setting method under protected cultivation[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2017,214:288−294. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.055
[21]	Alam M K, Sams S, Rana Z H, et al. Minerals, vitamin C, and effect of thermal processing on carotenoids composition in nine varieties orange-fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2020,92:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103582
[22]	Hu Z Q, Wang H C, Hu G B, et al. Measurement of sugars, organic acids and vitamin C in litchi fruit by high per-formance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2005,93(4):89−93.
[23]	何伟忠, 韦凯丽, 华震宇, 等. 不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及评价指标[J]. 新疆农业科学,2019,56(9):1652−1658.
[24]	黄月琼, 邓文, 李谈潇. 不同品种哈密瓜果实品质研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2015,46(1):41−46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2015.01.007
[25]	张敬敬, 李冰, 高秀瑞, 等. 河北省不同厚皮甜瓜品种的品质测定与综合评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2018(4):116−118.
[26]	Lu Y, Guo S, Zhang F, et al. Comparison of functional components and antioxidant activity ofLycium barbarum L. fruits from different regions in China[J]. Molecules,2019,24(12):2228. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122228
[27]	Palmeri R, Parafati L, Arena E, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of semi-processed frozen prickly pear juice as affected by cultivar and harvest time[J]. Foods,2020,9(2).
[28]	王乐乐. 32份甜瓜种质主要品质性状评价分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.

[1]	YIN Hongmei, CHEN Haoran, YIN Ziran, TANG Zhenyi, ZENG Jinxiu, SHI Xiaodan, ZHANG Lu, TU Zongcai. Comparison of Volatile Flavor Compounds and Qualities between Traditional Fermented and Inoculated Fermented of Mei yu[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(15): 56-65. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023070267
[2]	ZHANG Shiyao, XIAO Yue, WANG Xinyu, CHU Chuanqi, WANG Tao, HU Xiaosong, YI Junjie. Quality Characteristics of Fermented Chili Peppers Using Different Inoculated and Natural Fermentation Approaches[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(12): 129-139. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023070254
[3]	ZHU Jiamin, MO Ziyao, LI Mengtong, XIN Yueqi, ZHU Ying'ao, WANG Hui, CHEN Qian. Study on Different Inoculation Levels of Lactobacillus sakei on the Improvement of Quality Characteristics of Low-sodium Dry Sausages[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(7): 133-142. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022060041
[4]	TANG Kaiwei, HUANG Xiaoying, YI Yuwen, ZHU Chenglin, DENG Jing, YE Haixiao, TANG Junni. Effect of Fermentation with Single and Co-culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus on the Quality of Yogurt[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(23): 127-132. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022020250
[5]	LIU Chang, ZUO Changzhou, PENG Jing, CHEN Jikun, TU Kang, PAN Leiqing. Response Surface Optimization of the Fermentation Process of Tomato Juice by Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Quality Evaluation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(10): 246-253. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021080285
[6]	ZHOU Yingjun, XIE Chunliang, CHEN Baizhong, GONG Wenbing, ZHU Zuohua, XU Chao, YANG Qi, PENG Yuande. Effect of Different Yeast and Lactobacillus plantarum Combined Fermentation on the Quality of Xinhui Citrus Ferment[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(6): 118-125. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021060189
[7]	ZHANG Lihua, WANG Xia, ZHA Mengmeng, TANG Peixin, SHI Xun, ZONG Wei, ZHAO Guangyuan. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum Microcapsules Fermentation on the Quality of Carrot Chips[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(2): 135-141. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021040234
[8]	ZHANG Li-hua, WANG Xia, ZHAO Guang-yuan, ZONG Wei. Effects of Adding Jujube Juice on Quality of Carrot Fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(15): 99-105. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.15.016
[9]	LIU Ying-ping, CUI Li, NIU Li-ying, LI Da-jing, LIU Chun-quan, XIAO Li-xia. Study on the microwave sterilization of Lactobacillus plantarum and application of microwave on pickled lettuce[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (24): 245-248. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.24.038
[10]	JIN Le-tian, WU Shi-rong, LIU Tong-jie, HE Guo-qing. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum inoculated fermentation on the quality of kimchi[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (23): 195-198. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.23.032

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(11)

1.	吕帅，刘红微，刘帅，董毓卿. 黄芪饮料的配方优化. 食品工业. 2025(03): 4-7 .
2.	樊月月，罗浩，李富豪，徐梦珠，郝娟，谢心. 参芪补胰方通过调节TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB信号通路治疗2型糖尿病大鼠的作用机制. 中华中医药学刊. 2023(06): 237-242+279-281 .
3.	张国栋，张兰. 从脾肾探讨糖尿病足的病机. 实用中医内科杂志. 2023(11): 32-34 .
4.	周敏，吴黎，谭崇赋，徐旭英. 回阳生肌膏抗小鼠骨髓内皮祖细胞功能损伤的研究. 北京中医药大学学报. 2022(01): 41-52 .
5.	冯一帆，吴励萍，张祎盈，钱大玮，段金廒，宋孝雄，吕高虹，朱悦，许惠琴. 杞丹方对糖尿病小鼠降血糖作用及机制研究. 南京中医药大学学报. 2022(06): 504-510 .
6.	陈紫军，霍晓乾，任越，舒展，张燕玲. 复方杜仲健骨颗粒治疗骨关节炎的抗炎潜在药效物质及作用机制研究. 中国中药杂志. 2022(15): 4156-4163 .
7.	姜莉，王成，邢颖，徐怀德. 不同提取方法对黄芪提取液活性成分及抗氧化性的影响. 食品研究与开发. 2022(16): 119-126 .
8.	陈东方，高慧艳，王燕，徐冰，王海玉，张聪恪. 黄芪葛根胶囊降血糖作用的人体试食效果观察. 中国卫生检验杂志. 2022(20): 2442-2445 .
9.	王圣翔，强煜云，布培培. 内毒素致病机理及防治研究进展. 畜牧产业. 2021(11): 73-75 .
10.	孙亚娟. 止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽的疗效及对血清指标的影响. 中国民间疗法. 2021(21): 61-63 .
11.	冉建新，许蕊蕊，王晓杰. 基于小鼠模型筛选黄芪当归治疗2型糖尿病的最佳配比及最优半仿生提取工艺. 中国医药导刊. 2021(11): 828-834 .