ZHAO Lili, YANG Guodong, JIA Junxiang, et al. Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Welsh-Onion Quality Traits of Different Varieties[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(12): 253−261. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/ j.issn1002-0306.2020080131.
Citation: ZHAO Lili, YANG Guodong, JIA Junxiang, et al. Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Welsh-Onion Quality Traits of Different Varieties[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(12): 253−261. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/ j.issn1002-0306.2020080131.

Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Welsh-Onion Quality Traits of Different Varieties

More Information
  • Received Date: August 13, 2020
  • Available Online: April 13, 2021
  • Comprehensive evaluation system was established in order to provide technological support for screening and utilization of excellent welsh-onion (Allium Fistulosum L.) germplasm resources. Quality indicators of 42 varieties of trial welsh-onion were observed and determined. Data acquired was evaluated by means of variation analysis, principal component analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis, and finally the best variety was obtained. The results demonstrated that some quality traits differences were existed in different varieties of welsh-onion. The plant weight was appeared significant correlation with plant height, the length and coarseness of scallion stalk, blade length and plant width at 0.01 level. Wax powers were showed a significant correlation with Vitamin C at 0.01 level. By the component principal analysis, the cumulative contribution of variances of 10 principal components extracted was up to 81.2%. Together with correlation analysis, we finally considered 14 factors as quality evaluation indicators of welsh-onion, including the plant height, the length, coarseness and hardness of scallion stalk, the length and color of blade, leaf sheath color, wax, water rate of cauloid, cellulose, soluble sugar, free amino acids, ethereal oil and alcohols contents. Based on the comprehensive rankings, the five highest scores were in order as follows: ‘Liaocong No.7’, ‘Liaocong No.12’, ‘Wanneng Yecong’, ‘Wu Yeqi’ and ‘Teji Yuanzang’ Welsh-onion. Finally, the grade division obtained from K value cluster analysis was in sequence of C>B>D>A. This experiment comprehensively analyzed the quality of different welsh-onion varieties, comprehensively and objectively evaluated the quality of welsh-onion varieties, and provided scientific reference and guidance for the development of excellent germplasm resources and variety promotion.
  • [1]
    苗锦山, 张笑笑, 棣圣哲, 等. 大葱穴盘育苗关键技术[J]. 中国蔬菜,2019(6):101−103.
    [2]
    李屹. 特色蔬菜品种大通鸡腿葱产业现状及发展对策[J]. 北方园艺,2013(15):198−200.
    [3]
    李莉峰, 叶春苗, 王丽颖, 等. 辽宁省大葱产业现状及对策[J]. 北方园艺,2017(3):187−189. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201703001
    [4]
    高莉敏, 陈运起, 高秀云, 等. 大葱不同类型品种主要营养成分分析[J]. 山东农业科学,2008,4:50−51, 56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2008.04.020
    [5]
    吴庆, 刘耀峰, 方海田, 等. 红葱种质资源主要品质性状的分析研究[J]. 中国调味品,2015,40(10):11−14, 29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2015.10.004
    [6]
    方海田, 刘慧燕, 张光弟, 等. 宁夏3种葱属蔬菜的挥发性成分比较分析[J]. 中国调味品,2018,43(11):145−149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2018.11.030
    [7]
    Wenzel G, Kennard W C, Havey M J. Quantitative trait analysis of fruit quality in cucumber: QTI detection, confirmation, and comparison with mating-design variation[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1995,1(91):53−61.
    [8]
    冉军舰, 孙华迪, 陈晓静, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析的35个苹果品种多酚综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2017,8:139−144.
    [9]
    李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(6):160−171.
    [10]
    Paulina N, Aneta W, Piotr L. Principal component analysis (PCA) of physicochemical compounds’ content in different cultivars of peach fruits, including qualification and quantification of sugar and organic acids by HPLC[J]. European Food Research and Technology,2019,4(245):929−938.
    [11]
    刘莉, 高星, 华德平, 等. 不同质构检测方法对甜瓜果肉质构的评价[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2016,36(5):575−581.
    [12]
    Tang Y, Ren J, Liu C X, et al. Genetic characteristics and QTL analysis of the soluble sugar content in ripe tomato fruits[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2021(276):142−151.
    [13]
    Zhao L L, Liu A Q, Song T F, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the effects of grafting on sugar and α-linolenic acid metabolisms in fruits of cucumber with two different rootstocks[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2018(130):289−302.
    [14]
    王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015, 168−170.
    [15]
    柳荫, 吴凤智, 陈龙, 等. 考马斯亮蓝法测定核桃水溶性蛋白含量的研究[J]. 中国酿造,2013,32(12):131−133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5071.2013.12.032
    [16]
    Ahmed I, AIJuhaimi F, Ghafoor K, et al. Evaluation of chemical properties, amino acid contents and fatty acid compositions of sesame seed provided from different locations[J]. Journal of Oleo Science,2020,8(69):795−800.
    [17]
    朱灵秀, 戴清源, 车振明, 等. 紫皮洋葱油索氏提取工艺优化[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2010,36(10):156−160.
    [18]
    Zexiong C, Ning T, Huihe L, et al. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis during rhizome development of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe.) reveals hormone and transcriptional regulation involved in cellulose production[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2020,264:109154. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109154
    [19]
    Thirawat T, Sze Y L, Michelle J, et al. Structural changes induced by pulsed electric fields increase the concentration of volatiles released in Red Onion (Allium cepa L. var. Red Pearl) Bulbs[J]. Foods,2019,8(9):368. doi: 10.3390/foods8090368
    [20]
    Leila M, Heloise O, Antonio J, et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) for assessing the effects of pretreatment, feedstock, and enzyme complex association on cellulose hydrolysis[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery,2020,5:1−12.
    [21]
    杨明凯, 魏佑营, 武文珺, 等. 大葱品种间主要品质性状比较及相关性分析[J]. 山东农业科学,2012,44(9):22−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2012.09.006
    [22]
    曹玉鑫, 曹红霞, 王萍, 等. 营养液浓度对番茄生长、品质以及贮藏性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2017,23(3):1−23.
    [23]
    Thais M, Bianca C, Carmen C. Production of sustainable smart packaging based on cassava starch and anthocyanin by an extrusion process[J]. Journal of food engineering,2021,289:232−240.
    [24]
    汪河伟, 贺永健, 刘焕, 等. α-萘乙酸甲酯对马铃薯贮藏期营养品质的影响及残留动态研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,9(39):272−276.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LUO Mi, YIN Wang, DENG Renju, GUAN Yufang, PAN Mu, WU Qiaoyu, FU Mei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Starch and Noodles Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(4): 246-257. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023110125
    [2]LI Ke, LIN Zixi, LIU Jia, LIAO Maowen, YUAN Huaiyu, LIANG Yumei, PAN Cuiping, GUO Nanbin, ZHU Yongqing, ZHANG Guowei, LI Huajia. Comprehensive Evaluation of Plums Quality Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(8): 293-300. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023060002
    [3]HUANG Zhen, CI Huiting, LIU Zhiyong, XUE Yuqian, REN Xiuxia, XUE Jingqi, ZHANG Xiuxin. Comprehensive Evaluation on Yield and Quality of Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(5): 271-280. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050062
    [4]XU Mengting, WANG Qiang, HAO Yanbin, QI Jianxun, ZHANG Yunqi, DING Baomiao, CHEN Yonghao. Comprehensive Evaluation of Oil-use Traits of Walnut Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(2): 235-242. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023030206
    [5]QIN Liyue, SHI Pingping, LI Ronghui, MA Feifei, HU Xin, HE Daiqin, SHEN Hui, SU Huosheng. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Roasted Kernels in Macadamia Nuts Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(18): 331-341. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022100124
    [6]XU Wenjing, CHEN Changlin, DENG Sha, LIU Yijun, LÜ Yuanping. Comprehensive Evaluation of Blueberry Quality Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(13): 311-319. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021110198
    [7]Yue LEI, Yanlong GONG, Ruyue DENG, Dashuang ZHANG, Susong ZHU, Huihui TANG, Zhongyuan CHEN, Zhibin ZHANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Parboiled Rice Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 258-267. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050209
    [8]WANG Jian-fang, GAO Shan, MOU De-hua. Quality Evaluation of Different Varieties of Oat Based on Principal Components Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(13): 85-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.13.014
    [9]CAI Fang-yuan, WANG Pei, WANG Zhi-ting, LIU Jing, JIANG Mei. Evaluation of Rice Tofu Quality Based on Correlation Analysis and Principal Component Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(17): 33-39,45. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.17.006
    [10]WANG Wei, LV Xu-jian, ZHANG Yu, WANG Qiang, SHAO Xin, WANG Jun-hong, ZHU Zuo-yi, LI Xue, HU Gui-xian. Evaluation of nutritional quality of red bayberry based on cluster analysis and principal component[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (01): 278-280. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.01.047
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 孟新涛,许铭强,张婷,古丽米热·祖努纳,牛逍瞳,郭金宝,刘国庆,马燕. 基于GC-IMS技术分析新疆不同品种核桃油挥发性成分的差异. 中国油脂. 2025(03): 102-109 .
    2. 古丽米热·祖努纳,孟新涛,叶朵朵,付慧鑫,乔雪,乔雅洁,张婷. 不同储藏温度下鲜羊肉品质及风味的变化. 现代食品科技. 2025(03): 203-221 .
    3. 乔雪,乔雅洁,付慧鑫,孟新涛,张婷. 低压静电场辅助解冻对牛肉品质的影响. 食品工业科技. 2024(17): 48-56 . 本站查看
    4. 杨秉坤,剧柠,丁雨红,郭蓉,龚绵红. 沙棘酸奶挥发性风味物质的GC-IMS表征. 食品工业科技. 2023(13): 308-315 . 本站查看
    5. 张凡,张宇帆,苏心悦,徐文雅,安焕炯,马倩云,孙剑锋,王颉,王文秀. 基于顶空气相离子迁移谱的干腐病马铃薯挥发性成分分析. 食品科学. 2022(06): 317-323 .
    6. 王福成,米思,李劲松,王雨行,王向红. 基于气相色谱-离子迁移谱技术分析不同包装条件对黄瓜风味的影响. 食品工业科技. 2022(08): 296-304 . 本站查看
    7. 马姗,于文龙,焦英帅,刘卫华,王向红. 不同减菌处理对凡纳对虾贮藏期间品质的影响. 食品科技. 2022(03): 116-124 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (566) PDF downloads (35) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return