Comprehensive Evaluation of Starch and Noodles Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

LUO Mi; YIN Wang; DENG Renju; GUAN Yufang; PAN Mu; WU Qiaoyu; FU Mei

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023110125

Volume 46 Issue 4

Feb. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Supplements

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2025 > 46(4): 246-257. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023110125

LUO Mi, YIN Wang, DENG Renju, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Starch and Noodles Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(4): 246−257. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023110125.

Citation:

PDF (4430 KB)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Starch and Noodles Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

LUO Mi^{1, 2, 3,},
YIN Wang^{1, 2, 3},
DENG Renju^{1, 2, 3, ,},
GUAN Yufang^{1, 2, 3},
PAN Mu^{1, 2, 3},
WU Qiaoyu^{1, 2, 3},
FU Mei⁴

1.
Biological Technology Institute of Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550009, China
2.
Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology, Guiyang 550009, China
3.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Crop Cenetic Resources and Germplasm Innovation in Karst Region, Guiyang 550009, China
4.
Guizhou Provincial Crop Technology Extension Station, Guiyang 550000, China

More Information

Received Date: November 13, 2023
Available Online: December 09, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To scientifically evaluate the starch quality of different sweet potato varieties and establish the sweet potato starch quality evaluation system, 10 starchy sweet potato varieties were used as experimental materials. Their starch composition, particle size, molecular polymerization, thermodynamic characteristics, gelatinization properties, and noodles quality indexes were determined and analyzed. The differences in starch properties among different sweet potato varieties were thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the quality of starch was evaluated using correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and cluster analysis. Results exhibited significant variations in starch quality indexes among different varieties (P<0.05). Correlation analysis revealed varying degrees of association among the starch property indexes, with noodles quality primarily influenced by starch composition, particle size and molecular polymerization. By principal component analysis, 28 quality indicators were simplified into 7 principal components, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 96.761%, which could reflect most of the information of the original indicators. The comprehensive scores of starch quality indexes of 10 sweet potato varieties were ranked as Yushu 198, Shangshu 19, Yushu 50, Yushu 15, Qining 19, Qianshu 11, Xushu 22, Sushu 28, Xushu 37, Eshu 6. The 10 sweet potato varieties were classified into five categories through cluster analysis. Among them, Shangshu 19 in the third category exhibits larger starch particle size and higher setback value, a low noodles breaking rate and excellent elasticity, which was suitable for noodle processing. Yushu 198 has the highest score, with better noodles mastication, but higher cooking loss and greater hardness. Eshu 6, Sushu 28 and Xushu 37 received low comprehensive scores indicating poor noodles quality and unsuitability for noodles processing.
- sweet potato,
- starch quality,
- noodles,
- principal component analysis,
- cluster analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	唐芬, 赵路宽, 苏一钧, 等. 基于InDel标记分析305份中国甘薯登记品种遗传多样性[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2024,25(4):576−585. [TANG F, ZHAO L K, SU Y J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 305 registered sweetpotato varieties in China based on InDel markers[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources,2024,25(4):576−585.] TANG F, ZHAO L K, SU Y J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 305 registered sweetpotato varieties in China based on InDel markers[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2024, 25（4）: 576−585.
[2]	联合国粮农组织的粮食和农业数据. https://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#data. [Food and agriculture data from the Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/fao-stat/zh/#data.] Food and agriculture data from the Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/fao-stat/zh/#data.
[3]	ZHOU W Z, YANG J, HONG Y, et al. Impact of amylose content on starch physicochemical properties in transgenic sweet potato[J]. Carbohydrate. Polymers,2015,122:417−427. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.003
[4]	MOHAMMED O, BIN X. Review on the physicochemical properties, modifications, and applications of starches and its common modified forms used in noodle products[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2020,112:106286.
[5]	ZHANG Y Y, LI G P, WU Y W, et al. Influence of amylose on the pasting and gel texture properties of chestnut starch during thermal processing[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,294:378−383. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.070
[6]	YONG H M, WANG X C, SUN J, et al. Comparison of the structural characterization and physicochemical properties of starches from seven purple sweet potato varieties cultivated in China[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules:Structure, Function and Interactions,2018,120:1632−1638.
[7]	LI Y B, ZHAO L X, SHI L Q, et al. Sizes, components, crystalline structure, and thermal properties of starches from sweet potato varieties originating from different countries[J]. Molecules,2022,27(6):1905. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061905
[8]	唐忠厚, 朱晓倩, 李强, 等. 不同基因型甘薯直链淀粉含量差异研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2011,32(11):108−110. [TANG Z H, ZHU X Q, LI Q, et al. Genotype variation in amylose content of sweetpotato[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2011,32(11):108−110.] TANG Z H, ZHU X Q, LI Q, et al. Genotype variation in amylose content of sweetpotato[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2011, 32（11）: 108−110.
[9]	王建芳, 高山, 牟德华. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的不同品种燕麦品质评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(13):85−91. [WANG J F, GAO S, MU D H. Quality evaluation of different varieties of Oat Based on principal components analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2020,41(13):85−91.] WANG J F, GAO S, MU D H. Quality evaluation of different varieties of Oat Based on principal components analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41（13）: 85−91.
[10]	陈重远, 张大双, 张习春, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对籼稻资源品质性状的综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种,2021,19(24):8330−8340. [CHEN Z Y, ZHANG D S, ZHANG X C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of indica rice resources based on PCA and CA[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding,2021,19(24):8330−8340.] CHEN Z Y, ZHANG D S, ZHANG X C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of indica rice resources based on PCA and CA[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19（24）: 8330−8340.
[11]	雷月, 宫彦龙, 邓茹月, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析综合评价蒸谷米的品质特性[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(7):258−267. [LEI Y, GONG Y L, DENG R Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality characteristics of parboiled rice based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(7):258−267.] LEI Y, GONG Y L, DENG R Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality characteristics of parboiled rice based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42（7）: 258−267.
[12]	WANG Q, LI X N, CHEN H W. et al. Mapping combined with principal component analysis identifies excellent lines with increased rice quality[J]. Scientific Reports,2022,12:59−69. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03077-2
[13]	ZENG J, GAO H Y, LI G L, et al. Physichemical properties of different corn varieties by principal components analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Chemical Society of Pakistan,2013,35(5):1275−1278.
[14]	GUO K, LIU T X, XU A H, et al. Structural and functional properties of starches from root tubers of white, yellow, and purple sweet potatoes[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2019,89:829−836. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.058
[15]	何洁, 闫飞燕, 黄芳, 等. 双波长法测定薯芋类农产品中直链淀粉和支链淀粉的含量[J]. 食品工业科技,2022,43(7):303−309. [HE J, YAN F Y, HUANG F, et al. Determination of amylose and amylopectin contents in Yam and Taros by Dual-Wavelength Spectrophotometry[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2022,43(7):303−309.] HE J, YAN F Y, HUANG F, et al. Determination of amylose and amylopectin contents in Yam and Taros by Dual-Wavelength Spectrophotometry[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43（7）: 303−309.
[16]	DENG F, LI Q P, CHEN H, et al. Relationship between chalkiness and the structural and thermal properties of rice starch after shading during grain-filling stage[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2021,252:117−212.
[17]	GUO L. In vitro amylase hydrolysis of amylopectins from cereal starches based on molecular sturcture of amylopectins[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2017,77:238−247.
[18]	KONG X L, BAO J S, CORKE H. Physical properties of Amaranthus starch[J]. Food Chemistry,2009,113(2):371−376. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.028
[19]	邹金浩, 李燕, 李文佳, 等. 淮山淀粉性质及其与粉条品质的相关性[J]. 中国粮油学报,2020,35(8):69−75. [ZOU J H, LI Y, LI W J, et al. Properties of Yam starches and its correlation with the qualities of starch noodles[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association,2020,35(8):69−75.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2020.08.012 ZOU J H, LI Y, LI W J, et al. Properties of Yam starches and its correlation with the qualities of starch noodles[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2020, 35（8）: 69−75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2020.08.012
[20]	石彬, 李咏富, 龙明秀, 等. 四种多糖代替明矾改善红薯粉的品质特性[J]. 现代食品科技,2020,36(9):202−210. [SHI B, LI Y F, LONG M X, et al. Enhancing the quality of sweet potato powder with four polysaccharides instead of alum[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology,2020,36(9):202−210.] SHI B, LI Y F, LONG M X, et al. Enhancing the quality of sweet potato powder with four polysaccharides instead of alum[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2020, 36（9）: 202−210.
[21]	张令文, 琚星, 李欣欣, 等. 8个品种甘薯淀粉的理化性质及其相关性分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(4):26−32. [ZHANG L W, JU X, LI X X, et al. Physicochemical properties and their correlation of starches from eight sweet potato cultivars[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(4):26−32.] ZHANG L W, JU X, LI X X, et al. Physicochemical properties and their correlation of starches from eight sweet potato cultivars[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42（4）: 26−32.
[22]	ZHU F, YANG X S, CAI Y Z, et al. Physicochemical properties of sweetpotato starch[J]. Starch-Stä rke,2011,63(5):249−259.
[23]	侯夫云, 陈桂玲, 董顺旭, 等. 不同品种甘薯淀粉组分、物化及粉条品质的比较研究[J]. 核农学报,2022,36(2):392−401. [HOU F Y, CHEN G L, DONG S X, et al. Comparative study on starch composition, physicochemistry and vermicelli quality of different varieties of sweet potato[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences,2022,36(2):392−401.] doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.02.0392 HOU F Y, CHEN G L, DONG S X, et al. Comparative study on starch composition, physicochemistry and vermicelli quality of different varieties of sweet potato[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36（2）: 392−401. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.02.0392
[24]	ABEGUNDE O K, MU T H, CHEN J W, et al. Physicochemical characterization of sweet potato starches popularly used in Chinese starch industry[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2013,33(2):169−177. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.03.005
[25]	史春余, 姚海兰, 张立明, 等. 不同类型甘薯品种块根淀粉粒粒度的分布特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2011,44(21):4537−4543. [SHI C Y, YAO H L, ZHANG L M, et al. Starch granule size distribution in storage roots of different types of sweetpotato cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2011,44(21):4537−4543.] SHI C Y, YAO H L, ZHANG L M, et al. Starch granule size distribution in storage roots of different types of sweetpotato cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44（21）: 4537−4543.
[26]	徐家露. 不同糯稻品种的支链淀粉结构及其遗传基础研究[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学, 2021. [XU J L. Structural analysis and genetic basis of amylopectin in different glutinous rice varieties[D]. Nanchang:Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2021.] XU J L. Structural analysis and genetic basis of amylopectin in different glutinous rice varieties[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2021.
[27]	李艺博. 不同甘薯品种淀粉的理化特性研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2022. [LI Y B. Physicochemical properties of starches from different sweetpotato varieties[D]. Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2022.] LI Y B. Physicochemical properties of starches from different sweetpotato varieties[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022.
[28]	HOOVER R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches:A review[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2001,45(3):253−267. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00260-5
[29]	LIN L S, GUO D W, ZHAO L X, et al. Comparative structure of starches from high-amylose maize inbred lines and their hybrids[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2016,52:19−28. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.008
[30]	COOKE D, GIDLEY M J. Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinisation:Origin of the enthalpic transition[J]. Carbohydrate research,1992,227:103−112. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85063-6
[31]	SHAR T, ZHONG H S, ALI U, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with starch paste viscosity attributes by using double haploid populations of rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2020,19(7):1691−1703. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62726-7
[32]	孙健, 岳瑞雪, 钮福祥, 等. 淀粉型甘薯品种直链淀粉含量、糊化特性和乙醇发酵特性的关系[J]. 作物学报,2012,38(3):479−486. [SUN J, YUE R X, NIU F X, et al. Relationship among amylose content, starch pasting and ethanol fermentation in sweetpotato varieties for starch use[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2012,38(3):479−486.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00479 SUN J, YUE R X, NIU F X, et al. Relationship among amylose content, starch pasting and ethanol fermentation in sweetpotato varieties for starch use[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38（3）: 479−486. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00479
[33]	谭洪卓, 谭斌, 刘明, 等. 甘薯淀粉性质与其粉丝品质的关系[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(4):286−292. [TAN H Z, TAN B, LIU M, et al. Relationship between properties of sweet potato starch and qualities of sweet potato starch noodles[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(4):286−292.] TAN H Z, TAN B, LIU M, et al. Relationship between properties of sweet potato starch and qualities of sweet potato starch noodles[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25（4）: 286−292.
[34]	李燕, 贺燕, 邹金浩, 等. 基于主成分和聚类分析的不同品种淮山淀粉品质评价[J]. 中国粮油学报,2023,38(10):223−230. [LI Y, HE Y, ZOU J H, et al. Quality evaluation of different cultivars of Yam starches based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association,2023,38(10):223−230.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2023.10.034 LI Y, HE Y, ZOU J H, et al. Quality evaluation of different cultivars of Yam starches based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2023, 38（10）: 223−230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2023.10.034
[35]	罗红霞, 王丽, 句荣辉, 等. 不同品种谷子淀粉的品质特性及主成分分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,39(24):11−17. [LUO H X, WANG L, JU R H, et al. Quality characteristics and principal component analysis of different varieties of millet starch[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2018,39(24):11−17.] LUO H X, WANG L, JU R H, et al. Quality characteristics and principal component analysis of different varieties of millet starch[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39（24）: 11−17.

Supplements (1)

Supplements
Other Related Supplements

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	张丹丹，李国辉，唐德红，李梅. GC-MS/MS法测定苹果中乙螨唑含量的不确定度评定. 现代食品. 2024(01): 156-162 .
2.	易霞，吴兵，李俊. 结球甘蓝中3种有机磷类农药残留量标准不确定度评定. 粮食科技与经济. 2024(06): 74-78 .
3.	张君丽，张迪雅，迟恒，葛驰宇. 气相色谱-串联质谱法测定果汁中4种六六六残留量的不确定度评定. 食品与发酵工业. 2023(21): 264-269 .
4.	刘艳云. QuEChERS-气相色谱-质谱联用法测定香蕉中苯醚甲环唑残留量的测量不确定度评定. 食品安全导刊. 2022(01): 82-86 .
5.	徐幸，张燕，舒平，杨卫花，赵浩军，董依依. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱同位素内标法测定鸡肉中头孢菌素的不确定度评定. 食品工业科技. 2022(08): 312-319 . 本站查看
6.	张丽霞，郭庆园，华启诚，李向梅. GC-MS法测定保健食品中他汀类药物含量的不确定度评定. 食品与机械. 2022(06): 82-87 .
7.	郭妍妍，陈丽丽. GC-MS测定芹菜中毒死蜱含量的不确定度评定. 现代食品. 2022(14): 132-135+140 .
8.	陆振华，于丽芳，蔡丹萍，李成. QuEChERS-气相色谱——串联质谱法测定茶叶中水胺硫磷农药残留的不确定度评定. 食品与机械. 2022(10): 55-60+68 .
9.	周芳梅，陈茹，罗小宝，陈晓嘉. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定凉茶中对乙酰氨基酚的不确定度评定. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2021(09): 3514-3521 .
10.	牛立沙，张亚丽，孟志娟，孙磊，赵丽敏，孙文毅，郭丽敏，李强. 气相色谱法测定韭菜中氯氰菊酯残留量的不确定度评定. 中国测试. 2021(S2): 58-62 .