TAO Qinghui, YANG Xue, SONG Yujie, et al. Analysis of Food Safety Sampling Data in China from 2017 to 2019 [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 231−239. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070341.
Citation: TAO Qinghui, YANG Xue, SONG Yujie, et al. Analysis of Food Safety Sampling Data in China from 2017 to 2019 [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 231−239. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070341.

Analysis of Food Safety Sampling Data in China from 2017 to 2019

More Information
  • Received Date: July 27, 2020
  • Available Online: January 27, 2021
  • The potential risks were found out and the trend of risk changes were predicted by sortting out, excavating and deeply analyzing the data of the national food safety supervision sampling inspection data from 2017 to 2019, in order to provide a reference for the regulatory authorities to formulate a supervision sampling inspection plan and determine the focus of supervision, and to provide a guidance for enterprises to investigate risk, prevent and control self-risk. The analysis found that the main food safety problems were microbial contamination, the use of food additives in excess of the limits and unqualified quality index, accounting for 73.57% of the total number of unqualified items. Products with higher risks included 10 categories such as convenience foods, frozen beverages, and food-related products etc. Their unqualified rates were all above 2.5% and the sampling number accounted for 42.34% of the total number of samples.The food safety risk in the second quarter of each year was significantly higher than other quarters.Compared with other origins, products from Guangxi had the highest risk, with an unqualified rate of 6.08%. The results showed that the situation of food safety in the past three years was good, with the food safety level improving year by year. The overall unqualified rate was 1.94%. However, there were still varying degrees of risk in some categories, indicators, and production areas, so regulators should pay more attention to them.
  • [1]
    吕冰峰, 罗飞亚, 王学硕, 等. 2015年国家食品安全监督抽检数据的归类分析与思考[J]. 中国药事,2017,31(11):1304−1310.
    [2]
    吕冰峰, 吕卓, 应雨晴, 等. 2016~2017年全国食品安全监督抽检结果分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,11(9):2862−2867.
    [3]
    黄湘鹭, 邢书霞, 吕冰峰, 等. 2016~2017 年我国食品安全抽检数据分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,9(17):4746−4754. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2018.17.046
    [4]
    刘欢. 2018~2019年全国食品安全监督抽检情况分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2020,11(7):2347−2351.
    [5]
    李庆, 谭彩丹. 江西下发 2016 年食品安全抽检计划[N]. 中国食品安全报, 2016-01-30.
    [6]
    Saaty T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process[J]. Interfaces,1994,24(6):19−43. doi: 10.1287/inte.24.6.19
    [7]
    Hu W, Liu G B, Tu Y. Wastewater treatment evaluation for enterprises based on fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation: A case study in industrial park in Taihu Basin, China[J]. Springer Plus,2016,5(1):907. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2523-8
    [8]
    Sun H Y, Wang S F, Hao X M. An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China[J]. Agr Water Manage,2017,179:324−337. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.002
    [9]
    张伟. 食品安全监督抽检工作的开展及实践要点研究[J]. 食品安全导刊,2018(3):79−80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0270.2018.03.061
    [10]
    李越凡. 有效进行食品安全抽检监测工作相关问题探讨[J]. 中国药事,2016,30(5):426−428.
    [11]
    余超, 李文学, 李迎月, 等. 食品安全监督抽检工作存在的问题及解决方法探讨[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(12):3730−3733. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2019.12.016
    [12]
    何平, 王煜红, 江小明, 等. 提高我国食品安全抽检监测有效性的分析和建议[J]. 中国酿造,2015,34(3):162−165. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2015.03.039
    [13]
    国家食品药品监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2017年第一季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2017年第57号〕. [2018-03-21]. http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1687/171796.html.
    [14]
    国家食品药品监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2017年第二季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2017年第118 号〕. [2018-03-21]. http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1687/175314.html.
    [15]
    国家食品药品监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于 2017 年第三季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2017年第171号〕. [2018-03-21]. http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1687/216123.html.
    [16]
    国家食品药品监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2017年第四季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2018年第41号〕. [2018-03-21]. http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1687/225019.html.
    [17]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2018年第一季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2018年第6号〕. (2018-4-28)[2018-4-26]. http://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/bgt/201902/t20190222_291063.html.
    [18]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2018年第二季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2018年第29号〕. (2018-9-13)[2018-9-13]. http://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/bgt/201902/t20190217_288898.html.
    [19]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2018年第三季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2018年第38号〕. [2018-10-31]. http://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/bgt/201902/t20190217_288891.html.
    [20]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2018年第四季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2019年第5号〕. [2019-1-29]. http://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/bgt/201902/t20190217_288773.html.
    [21]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2019年第一季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2019年第13号〕. [2019-4-28]. http://www.samr.gov.cn/spcjs/yjjl/sphz/201906/t20190613_302341.html.
    [22]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2019年第二季度食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2019年第25号〕. [2019-8-1]. http://www.samr.gov.cn/spcjs/yjjl/sphz/201908/t20190805_305404.html.
    [23]
    国家市场监督管理总局. 市场监管总局关于2019年下半年食品安全监督抽检情况分析的通告〔2020年第4号〕. [2020-1-22]. http://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/spcjs/202001/t20200123_310736.html.
    [24]
    Elad D. Risk assessment of malicious biocontamination of food[J]. J Food Prot,2005,68(6):1302−1305. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-68.6.1302
    [25]
    Yi X B, Wang L. Land suitability assessment on a watershed of Loess Plateau using the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Plos One,2013,8(7):e69498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069498
    [26]
    Sun S, Chen Y, Lin Y, et al. Occurrence, spatial distribution, and seasonal variation of emerging trace organic pollutants in source water for Shanghai, China[J]. Sci Total Environ,2018(639):1−7.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 詹艺舒,陈薪旭,魏源. 微生物测试片的组成及在食品检测中的应用研究进展. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2025(01): 250-257 .
    2. 贺伟春,刘亚平,狄建兵,宋支萱. 黄菜即食肉丸配方优化及贮藏特性. 食品工业科技. 2024(14): 175-183 . 本站查看
    3. 杨睿,蔡琳,卢灿鑫,李乐诗,张洁吟,刘晓晗,王韦达. 致病菌测试片质量评价方法研究. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(23): 41-51 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (397) PDF downloads (63) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return