• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
刘伯言,贾修滨,薛俊莉,等. 顶空-气相色谱法与氢气微电极法用于富氢水中氢气含量的检测[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(2):352−357. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030360.
引用本文: 刘伯言,贾修滨,薛俊莉,等. 顶空-气相色谱法与氢气微电极法用于富氢水中氢气含量的检测[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(2):352−357. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030360.
LIU Boyan, JIA Xiubin, XUE Junli, et al. Determination of Hydrogen Concentration in Hydrogen-rich Water by Headspace Gas Chromatography and Hydrogen Microelectrode[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(2): 352−357. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030360.
Citation: LIU Boyan, JIA Xiubin, XUE Junli, et al. Determination of Hydrogen Concentration in Hydrogen-rich Water by Headspace Gas Chromatography and Hydrogen Microelectrode[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(2): 352−357. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030360.

顶空-气相色谱法与氢气微电极法用于富氢水中氢气含量的检测

Determination of Hydrogen Concentration in Hydrogen-rich Water by Headspace Gas Chromatography and Hydrogen Microelectrode

  • 摘要: 氢气含量为富氢水的关键指标之一,但目前尚无标准检测方法。本文将超饱和富氢水稀释后采用顶空-气相色谱法与氢气微电极法测定了氢气含量,对检测方法进行了条件优化、方法学评价,并对市售富氢水产品进行了氢气含量检测。结果显示,顶空-气相色谱法优化后的顶空进样平衡温度为70 ℃、平衡时间为20 min。在0~1.61 mg/L氢气含量范围内决定系数(R2)为0.9976,在0.161、0.805、1.449 mg/L添加水平,回收率分别为104.90%、102.22%和97.78%,相对标准偏差(RSD)分别为3.87%、2.29%和1.69%。氢气微电极法在0~1.61 mg/L氢气含量范围内R2为0.9978,在0.161、0.805、1.449 mg/L添加水平,回收率分别为96.75%、95.78%和98.00%,RSD分别为1.84%、0.98%和2.80%。对7种市售罐装富氢水的检测发现,不同产品中氢气含量相差较大,从0.8~6.2 mg/L不等,但均达到现有团体标准的要求。开盖后超饱和富氢水中氢气存留量在30 min内降低约10%,6 h内降低约50%。本研究建立了富氢水中氢气含量的检测方法,顶空-气相色谱法与氢气微电极法均可用于实际样品的测定。

     

    Abstract: The hydrogen concentration is one of the key indicators of hydrogen-rich water, but there is no standard detection method at present. In this paper, the concentration of hydrogen in hydrogen-rich water was determined by headspace gas chromatography and hydrogen microelectrode followed by sample dilution. The detection method was optimized, the methodological evaluations were performed, and the hydrogen concentrations of hydrogen-rich water products were tested. Results showed that for headspace gas chromatography method, the optimized headspace sampling equilibrium temperature was 70 ℃ and the time was 20 min. The determination coefficient (R2) was 0.9976 in the range of 0~1.61 mg/L hydrogen content. The recoveries were 104.90%, 102.22%, 97.78%, and the relative standard deviations (RSD) were 3.87%, 2.29%, 1.69% at the spiked levels of 0.161, 0.805 and 1.449 mg/L. For hydrogen microelectrode method, the R2 was 0.9978 in the range of 0~1.61 mg/L hydrogen content. The recoveries were 96.75%, 95.78%, 98.00%, and the RSD were 1.84%, 0.98%, 2.80% at the spiked levels of 0.161, 0.805 and 1.449 mg/L. For the detection of seven commercial hydrogen-rich water products, it showed that hydrogen content varies greatly, ranging from 0.8~6.2 mg/L, although they all met the requirements of the existing group standard. The hydrogen concentration decreased by 10% in 30 min and 50% in 6 h after the cover was opened. The present study would develop the methods for hydrogen concentration detection in hydrogen-rich water, and both of the headspace gas chromatography and hydrogen microelectrode methods were reliable and can be used in actual samples.

     

/

返回文章
返回