• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
王蓉, 周丽, 任兴权, 刘盼, 杨雪芬, 崔丰莉. 洋葱带式热风干燥工艺优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(6): 195-201. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050115
引用本文: 王蓉, 周丽, 任兴权, 刘盼, 杨雪芬, 崔丰莉. 洋葱带式热风干燥工艺优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(6): 195-201. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050115
WANG Rong, ZHOU Li, REN Xingquan, LIU Pan, YANG Xuefen, CUI Fengli. Optimization Technology of Layer Mesh Belt Hot Air Drying of Onion[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(6): 195-201. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050115
Citation: WANG Rong, ZHOU Li, REN Xingquan, LIU Pan, YANG Xuefen, CUI Fengli. Optimization Technology of Layer Mesh Belt Hot Air Drying of Onion[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(6): 195-201. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050115

洋葱带式热风干燥工艺优化

Optimization Technology of Layer Mesh Belt Hot Air Drying of Onion

  • 摘要: 以鲜洋葱为原料,研究平均干燥温度、履带速率、进料速率对洋葱五层网带式热风干燥效果的影响。在单因素实验的基础上,采用Box-Behnken实验,以平均干燥温度、履带速率、进料速率为影响因素,以含水量、干燥得率、光学指数综合评分为响应值建立二次回归方程。结果表明,对洋葱粒综合评分的影响大小顺序为干燥温度>履带速率>进料速率,得到最佳生产工艺参数为干燥温度70℃、履带速率10 cm/min、进料速率1200 kg/h,在此条件下,综合评分结果为82.02,与理论值82.32相差较小,优化结果可靠。

     

    Abstract: The influence of average heating temperature, belt speed, feeding rate on five-layer mesh belt hot air drying of onion was studied. On the basis of single factor experiment, Box-Benhnken experiment was used to establish a quadratic regression equation with average heating temperature, belt speed and feeding rate as influencing factors, water content, drying yield and color-optical index comprehensive score as response values. The results showed that comprehensive score of onion was influenced in decreasing order by heating temperature, belt speed and feeding rate. The optimum condition for five-layer mesh belt hot air drying of onion was: heating temperature, 70℃;belt speed, 10 cm/min;and feeding rate, 1200 kg/h. Under these conditions, the response value was 82. 02, agreeing with the predicted value(82.32), indicating that the optimization result was reliable.

     

/

返回文章
返回