• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
朱翠玲, 陈亮, 周瑾怡, 胡卫成, 沈婷, 纪丽莲. 不同提取方法对小麦麸皮多糖化学组分及免疫调节活性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(7): 17-23. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.07.004
引用本文: 朱翠玲, 陈亮, 周瑾怡, 胡卫成, 沈婷, 纪丽莲. 不同提取方法对小麦麸皮多糖化学组分及免疫调节活性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(7): 17-23. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.07.004
ZHU Cui-ling, CHEN Liang, ZHOU Jin-yi, HU Wei-cheng, SHEN Ting, JI Li-lian. Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Chemical Composition and Immnuoregulative Activity of Polysaccharides from Wheat Bran[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(7): 17-23. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.07.004
Citation: ZHU Cui-ling, CHEN Liang, ZHOU Jin-yi, HU Wei-cheng, SHEN Ting, JI Li-lian. Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Chemical Composition and Immnuoregulative Activity of Polysaccharides from Wheat Bran[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(7): 17-23. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.07.004

不同提取方法对小麦麸皮多糖化学组分及免疫调节活性的影响

Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Chemical Composition and Immnuoregulative Activity of Polysaccharides from Wheat Bran

  • 摘要: 目的:以小麦麸皮超微粉为实验材料,分别用酸法、碱法、水提和酶法提取获得多糖,研究不同提取方法对小麦麸皮多糖得率、提取后麸皮残渣微观形态、糖醛酸含量、硫酸根含量、蛋白质含量、单糖组成及免疫调节活性的影响。方法:采用苯酚-硫酸法测定多糖含量,硫酸-间羟基苯酚法测定糖醛酸含量,BaCl2-明胶法测定硫酸根含量,气相色谱法测定单糖组分;采用MTT检测细胞毒性,Griess法测定细胞上清液中NO含量,Western Blot法检测细胞诱导型一氧化氮合成酶(iNOS)和环氧合酶-2(COX-2)蛋白表达。结果:碱提法获得的粗多糖得率最高,为31.73%,测定提取的粗多糖中多糖含量为57.79%;小麦麸皮多糖中糖醛酸和硫酸根的含量依次为:碱提法>酶提法>酸提法>水提法;不同提取方法的小麦麸皮多糖组分中所含单糖的种类为阿拉伯糖、木聚糖及葡萄糖;MTT法检测四种小麦麸皮多糖对细胞均无毒性,其中水提多糖能促进RAW264.7细胞分泌NO因子并能促进细胞诱导型一氧化氮合成酶和环氧合酶-2蛋白的表达。结论:四种不同提取方法所得到的小麦麸皮多糖的得率、化学组成成分及生物活性各不相同,采用传统水提法工艺提取多糖更利于维持多糖的免疫调节活性。

     

    Abstract: Objective:Four different extraction methods(alkali extraction,acid extraction,enzymatic extraction,and hot water extraction)were used to extract polysaccharides from superfined wheat bran under the same extract conditions. The extraction yield,uronic acid contents,sulfate contents,protein contents,monosaccharide composition,and the immunoregulatory activities of four samples were investigated. Methods:The total carbohydrate and protein contents were determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method and the BCA kit. Uronic acid content of the polysaccharide was determined by sulfamate/m-hydroxydiphenyl assay. The sulfate content of the polysaccharide was determined by the BaCl2 gelatin method and quantitative determination of the monosaccharide composition of the polysaccharides was performed using gas chromatography system. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay and nitric oxide(NO)content was determined by Griess reagent assay. Moreover,the expression of iNOS and COX-2 was determined by western blot. Results:Comparing different extraction methods,polysaccharide by alkali extraction had the highest extraction yield,which reached up to 31.73%;total polysaccharides content was 57.79%. The contents of uronic acid and sulfate of four different samples were ranked as followed order:alkali extraction,enzymatic extraction,acid extraction,and hot water extraction. Monosaccharide composition of wheat bran polysaccharides were analyzed by GC-MS and rhamnose,arabinose,and glucose by GC system under different extraction. Four different samples didn’t show any cytotoxicity on RAW 264.7 cells and the polysaccharide prepared by water-extraction could significantly promote RAW264.7 cells to produce NO production. Furthermore,it could increase iNOS and COX-2 protein expression. Conclusion:The chemical composition and biological activity of wheat bran polysaccharide by different extraction methods were different,it was more beneficial to maintain the functional activity of polysaccharides based on the traditional water-extraction technology.

     

/

返回文章
返回