• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
邵理, 詹萍, 田洪磊. 响应面法优化新疆昆仑雪菊多糖提取工艺研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, (21): 233-237. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.21.042
引用本文: 邵理, 詹萍, 田洪磊. 响应面法优化新疆昆仑雪菊多糖提取工艺研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, (21): 233-237. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.21.042
SHAO Li, ZHAN Ping, TIAN Hong- lei. Optimization of the polysaccharides extraction technology of Kunlun Chrysanthemum in Xinjiang using response surface methodology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (21): 233-237. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.21.042
Citation: SHAO Li, ZHAN Ping, TIAN Hong- lei. Optimization of the polysaccharides extraction technology of Kunlun Chrysanthemum in Xinjiang using response surface methodology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (21): 233-237. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.21.042

响应面法优化新疆昆仑雪菊多糖提取工艺研究

Optimization of the polysaccharides extraction technology of Kunlun Chrysanthemum in Xinjiang using response surface methodology

  • 摘要: 本论文以多糖得率为指标,结合超声波辅助提取及响应面实验Box-Behnken设计的方法,探讨了液料比、超声时间、提取温度等参数对昆仑雪菊多糖得率的影响。研究结果表明:在液料比为60∶1(m L/g),超声时间为53min,提取温度为68℃的条件下提取两次,昆仑雪菊多糖得率最高可达9.85%,与理论预测值10.07%相比,其相对误差约为2.18%。 

     

    Abstract: In this paper, ultrasonic- assisted extraction combined with Box- Behnken design method of response surface methodology was applied for the Kunlun Chrysanthemum polysaccharide extraction.The influence of liquid- solid ratio, ultrasonic time, extraction temperature and other parameters were compared using polysaccharide yield as an index of extraction efficiency.The optimal extraction conditions were as follows: the liquid- solid ratio was60∶1 ( m L / g) , ultrasound extracting time was 53 min, extraction times were two, extraction temperature was 68℃.Under these conditions, the maximum experimental yield of polysaccharide was 9.85%, which was agreed closely to the predicted value 10.07%, the relative error was about 2.18%.

     

/

返回文章
返回