• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
刘畅, 刘敦华. 复合保水剂和超高压处理生鲜羊肉的失水率响应面分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (20): 308-311. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.075
引用本文: 刘畅, 刘敦华. 复合保水剂和超高压处理生鲜羊肉的失水率响应面分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (20): 308-311. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.075
LIU Chang, LIU Dun-hua. Response surface methodology for the effect of ultra-high pressure processing and water retaining agents on the dehydration rate of fresh mutton[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (20): 308-311. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.075
Citation: LIU Chang, LIU Dun-hua. Response surface methodology for the effect of ultra-high pressure processing and water retaining agents on the dehydration rate of fresh mutton[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (20): 308-311. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.075

复合保水剂和超高压处理生鲜羊肉的失水率响应面分析

Response surface methodology for the effect of ultra-high pressure processing and water retaining agents on the dehydration rate of fresh mutton

  • 摘要: 为研究复合保水剂和超高压对小包装生鲜羊肉品质的影响,选用三种常用保水剂:焦磷酸钠(SPP)、三聚磷酸钠(STP)和大豆分离蛋白(SPI)。在单因素实验的基础上,以不同的保水剂-压力组合测定生鲜羊肉失水率的变化,采用响应面实验设计法,综合羊肉的感官品质,得到优化后保水剂-压力最佳组合为:SPP0.20%、STP0.25%、SPI为5.00%、压力200MPa,生鲜羊肉产品的失水率为0.57%。该模型为超高压处理的生鲜肉品品质研究提供了一定的依据。 

     

    Abstract: The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of ultra-high pressure and water retaining agents on the quality of fresh mutton. Sodium pyrophosphate (SPP) , sodium tyipolyphosphate (STP) and soybean protein isolate (SPI) was chosed as water retaining agents. Based on single factor experiments, dehydration rate of fresh mutton products was measured which were processed by different levels of ultra-high pressure and water retaining agents. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied and sensory quality was considered to obtain the optimal combination. It was 0.20% SPP, 0.25% STP, 5.00% SPI, 200MPa ultrahigh pressure. Under this combination, the dehydration rate was 0.57%. Model verification showed that this model could provide some guidance for fresh meat quality control.

     

/

返回文章
返回