• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
彭友舜, 黄云祥, 郑旭静, 范海华, 张运英. 芦笋粗多糖蛋白质脱除工艺研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (20): 312-314. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.032
引用本文: 彭友舜, 黄云祥, 郑旭静, 范海华, 张运英. 芦笋粗多糖蛋白质脱除工艺研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (20): 312-314. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.032
PENG You-shun, HUANG Yun-xiang, ZHENG Xu-jing, FAN Hai-hua, ZHANG Yun-ying. Study on protein removal technology of asparagus polysaccharide[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (20): 312-314. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.032
Citation: PENG You-shun, HUANG Yun-xiang, ZHENG Xu-jing, FAN Hai-hua, ZHANG Yun-ying. Study on protein removal technology of asparagus polysaccharide[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (20): 312-314. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.20.032

芦笋粗多糖蛋白质脱除工艺研究

Study on protein removal technology of asparagus polysaccharide

  • 摘要: 以多糖保留率、蛋白脱除率的综合指数为指标,采用均匀设计实验确定Sevage法、三氯乙酸-正丁醇法脱除芦笋多糖蛋白的工艺条件。优化的工艺条件为:Sevage试剂与样液体积比1∶2、氯仿与正丁醇体积比3∶1、振荡时间34min、静置时间36min,多糖保留率为85.92%±0.15%,蛋白质去除率为42.68%±0.10%;三氯乙酸溶液与正丁醇的体积比1∶20、三氯乙酸-正丁醇与多糖溶液的体积比1∶2、振荡时间39min、静置时间60min,多糖保留率为66.21%±0.11%,蛋白质去除率为91.49%±0.30%。结果表明,三氯乙酸-正丁醇法脱除芦笋多糖中蛋白质效果优于Sevage法。 

     

    Abstract: With retention rate and deproteinized rate of polysaccharide as comprehensive evaluation indexes, to determine the process conditions of two methods including Sevage, TDA- NBA by the uniform design experiment. Results showed that optimum conditions were as follows:Sevage and feed liquid volume rate was1 ∶2, chloroform and NBA volume rate was 3 ∶1, oscillating time was 34min, standing time was 36min, deproteinized rate retention rate and of polysaccharide were 85.92%±0.15%, 42.68%±0.10%, respectively. TDA and NBA volume rate was 1 ∶20, TDA-NBA and polysaccharide solution volume rate was 1 ∶2, oscillating time was 39min, standing time was 60min, deproteinized rate retention rate and of polysaccharide were 66.21% ±0.11%, 91.49%±0.30%, respectively. Results showed that TDA-NBA was better than Sevage.

     

/

返回文章
返回