Biofilm Forming Ability and Influencing Factors of <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i>

GAO Mengdi; NING Xibin

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080256

Volume 44 Issue 10

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2023 > 44(10): 138-144. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080256

GAO Mengdi, NING Xibin. Biofilm Forming Ability and Influencing Factors of Vibrio vulnificus[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10): 138−144. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080256.

Citation:

PDF (4714 KB)

Biofilm Forming Ability and Influencing Factors of Vibrio vulnificus

GAO Mengdi^1,,
NING Xibin^{1, 2, 3, ,}

1.
College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2.
Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, China
3.
National R&D Branch Center for Freshwater Aquatic Products Processing Technology (Shanghai), Shanghai 201306, China

More Information

Received Date: August 23, 2022
Available Online: March 08, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The biofilm produced by 26 strains of Vibrio vulnificus (Vv) and the factors affecting biofilm formation were studied to provide theoretical basis for effective control of biofilm formation by Vv. In this study, Congo red plate method, improved test tube method and improved microplate method were used to analyze the ability of 25 isolated Vv strains and 1 standard strain to form biofilm, and one strain with the strongest ability to produce biofilm was selected from them. The effects of different initial bacterial concentration, temperature, culture time, pH, NaCl concentration, metal cations and contact materials on the formation of biofilm were investigated. The results showed that 25 strains (96.15%) had biofilm forming ability among the selected strains and VvK had the strongest ability to produce biofilm. At 25 ℃, the initial bacterial concentration was 10⁸ CFU/mL, 3% NaCl and pH8~9 for 24 h, the biofilm quantity was the largest. However, the formation of biofilm was inhibited by certain concentration of metal cations (Cu²⁺, Mn²⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺) definitely, and the inhibition ability of above cations decreases in turn. When VvK contacted hydrophilic surfaces (stainless steel and glass), the amount of biofilm formation was significantly higher than hydrophobic surfaces (polystyrene), and the amount of biofilm formation on stainless steel was the largest. The biofilm forming ability of different Vv was quite different, and had specific rules under different cultivation conditions, which should be paid more attention.
- Vibrio vulnificus,
- biofilm,
- culture conditions,
- influence factor,
- film production capacity

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	王明义, 胡成进. 创伤弧菌致病性及其毒力因子研究进展[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2017,29(12):1470−1473. [WANG M Y, HU C J. Research progress on the pathogenicity and virulence factors of Vibrio vulnificus[J]. Chinese Journal of Micro Ecology,2017,29(12):1470−1473. doi: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201712026
[2]	黄春兰, 余洪立, 马丽梅. 创伤弧菌感染1例[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志,2022,22(1):95−97. [HUANG C L, YU H L, MA L M. One case of Vibrio vulnificus infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy,2022,22(1):95−97.
[3]	ELBASHIR S, PARVEEN S, SCHWARZ J, et al. Seafood pathogens and information on antimicrobial resistance: A review[J]. Food Microbiology, 2018, 70: 85-93
[4]	唐旭华, 郭鹏豪, 周晖, 等. 创伤弧菌感染引起的坏死性筋膜炎2例[J]. 皮肤性病诊疗学杂志,2020,27(4):274−277. [TANG X H, GUO P H, ZHOU H, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Vibrio vulnificus infection in 2 cases[J]. Journal of Dermatology and Venereology,2020,27(4):274−277. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8468.2020.04.015
[5]	JONES M K, OLIVER J D. Vibrio vulnificus: disease and pathogenesis[J]. Infection & Immunity,2009,77(5):1723−1733.
[6]	LI J H, ZHAO X H. Effects of quorum sensing on the biofilm formation and viable but non-culturable state[J]. Food Research International,2020,137(7):109742.
[7]	MUHSIN J, WISAL A, SAADIA A, et al. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections[J]. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association,2018,81(1):7−11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.012
[8]	FLEMMING H C, WINGENDER J, SZEWZYK U, et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology,2016,14(9):563−575. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
[9]	JOO H S, OTTO M. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens[J]. Chemistry & Biology,2012,19(12):1503−1513.
[10]	SAXENA P. Biofilms: Architecture, resistance, quorum sensing and control mechanisms[J]. Indian Journal of Microbiology,2019,59(1):3−12. doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0757-6
[11]	COSTERTON J W, LEWANDOWSKI Z, CALDWELL D E, et al. Microbial biofilms.[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology,1995,49(1):711−745. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431
[12]	蔡瑞昭, 祁少海. 创伤弧菌生物特性及临床研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2020,15(6):490−494. [CAI R Z, QI S H. Biological characteristics and clinical research progress of Vibrio vulnificus[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury and Repair (electronic version),2020,15(6):490−494.
[13]	吴谦. 副溶血弧菌生物菌膜形成特性及亚甲基蓝光动力灭活作用研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学 WU Q. Study on the characteristics of biofilm formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and photodynamic inactivation of methylene blue[D]. Guangzhou: Jinan University.
[14]	THAÍS DIAS LEMOS KAISER A, B E M P, KÁTIA REGINA NETTO DOS SANTOS C, et al. Modification of the Congo red agar method to detect biofilm production by Staphylococcus epidermidis[J]. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease,2013,75(3):235−239. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.014
[15]	KUNWAR A, SHRESTHA P, SHRESTHA S, et al. Detection of biofilm formation among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients[J]. Burns Open,2021,5(2):125−129.
[16]	STEPANOVIC S. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation[J]. J Microbiol Methods,2000:40.
[17]	CHRISTENSEN G D, SIMPSON W A, J J YOUNGER, et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative Staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A quantitative model for the adherence of Staphylococci to medical devices[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,1986,22(6):996−1006.
[18]	贾玲华, 宁喜斌, 张徐晶. 溶藻弧菌生物被膜形成能力及特性分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(20):201−205. [JIA L H, NING X B, ZHANG X J. Analysis of biofilm formation ability and characteristics of Vibrio alginolyticus[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2015,36(20):201−205.
[19]	FEY P D, OLSON M E. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis[J]. Future Microbiology,2010,5(6):917−933. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.56
[20]	张晓婷, 邓一秒, 董冬丽, 等. 培养条件对奇异变形杆菌生物膜生长的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(12):6. [ZHANG X T, DENG Y M, DONG D L, et al. Effect of culture conditions on the biofilm of Proteus mirabilis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2020,41(12):6.
[21]	沈津宇, 倪莹, 高璐. 盐度对副溶血性弧菌生物特性的影响[J]. 现代食品,2018(6):91−94. [SHEN J Y, NI Y, GAO L. Effect of salinity on biological characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus[J]. Modern Food,2018(6):91−94.
[22]	刘文竹, 李红月, 范学亭, 等. 环境因素对溶藻弧菌HN08155生物膜形成的影响[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,33(4):365−371. [LIU W Z, LI H Y, FAN X T, et al. Effect of environmental factors on biofilm formation of Vibrio alginolyticus HN08155[J]. Journal of Hainan University (Natural Science Edition),2015,33(4):365−371.
[23]	YIN W, WANG Y, LIU L, et al. Biofilms: The microbial ''Protective Clothin'' in extreme environments[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2019,20(14):3423. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143423
[24]	BLANCO Y, ALFONSO RIVAS L, GONZALEZ-TORIL E, et al. Environmental parameters, and not phylogeny, determine the composition of extracellular polymeric substances in microbial mats from extreme environments[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 650 （ PT.1 （ 1-834 ）） : 384−393.
[25]	尹清干, 程俊茗, 刘腾飞, 等. 环境因子对鳗弧菌生物膜形成的影响[J]. 微生物学通报,2018,45(1):8. [YIN Q G, CHENG J M, LIU T F, et al. Effects of environmental factors on biofilm formation in Vibrio anguillus[J]. Bulletin of Microbiology,2018,45(1):8.
[26]	ZOU M, LIU D. Effects of carbon sources and temperature on the formation and structural characteristics of food-related Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms[J]. Food Science and Human Wellness,2020,9(4):370−376. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2020.05.007
[27]	ÇAM S, BRINKMEYER R. The effects of temperature, pH, and iron on biofilm formation by clinical versus environmental strains of Vibrio vulnificus[J]. Folia Microbiol,2020,65(3):557−566. doi: 10.1007/s12223-019-00761-9
[28]	ZHANG B Z. Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces[J]. Progress in Natural Science,2008(9):1049−1056.
[29]	TANG D, GAO Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Mg²⁺ reduces biofilm quantity in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans through inhibiting type IV pili formation[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters,2018,365(4):fnx266.
[30]	JESSE G, WILLIAM Y H, CYNTHIA G, et al. Critical shear stresses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from dental unit waterlines studied using microfluidics and additional magnesium ions[J]. Physics of Fluids,2022,34(2):021902. doi: 10.1063/5.0076737
[31]	熊富忠, 赵小希, 廖胤皓, 等. 材料表面特征对生物膜形成的影响及其应用[J]. 微生物学通报,2018,45(1):155−165. [XIONG F Z, ZHAO X X, LIAO Y H, et al. Effect of material surface characteristics on biofilm formation and its application[J]. Bulletin of Microbiology,2018,45(1):155−165.
[32]	WANG H H, CAI L L, LI Y H, et al. Biofilm formation by meat-borne Pseudomonas fluorescens on stainless steel and its resistance to disinfectants[J]. Food Control,2018,91(9):397−403.
[33]	李燕杰, 苏新国, 姚玉静, 等. 不同类型表面材料对单增李斯特菌生物被膜形成的影响[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版),2015,30(Z2):33−37. [LI Y J, SU X G, YAO Y J, et al. Effect of different surface materials on biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry (Natural Science Edition),2015,30(Z2):33−37.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(20)

1.	陆源添，刘迪. 杨树桑黄与紫孢侧耳共培养胞内多糖提取工艺优化及抗氧化活性分析. 食品工业科技. 2025(02): 208-217 . 本站查看
2.	李明櫆，王梦娜，李占峰，彭帮柱. 基于加热回流法的香菇多糖提取工艺优化及其产品研发. 食品科技. 2024(03): 210-216 .
3.	闫帅. 玫瑰多糖的提取纯化、结构表征、生物活性及应用研究进展. 食品与机械. 2024(10): 236-242 .
4.	李臣亮，蔡雪莹，杨安慧. 黑虎掌菌的化学成分及其药理作用研究进展. 生物技术通报. 2024(11): 24-33 .
5.	王晓岩，李刚，孔凡丽. 多脂鳞伞多糖对H22荷瘤小鼠抗肿瘤作用. 食用菌学报. 2023(01): 45-52 .
6.	戴玉成. 中国多孔菌驯化栽培研究进展. 菌物研究. 2023(Z1): 151-156 .
7.	王常贵，谭智杰，张巧毅，赵柔，黄婷，林元山. 一株产多糖真菌的筛选、鉴定与发酵条件优化. 湖南农业科学. 2023(02): 1-6 .
8.	张璐，李翘楚，王增利，丁强，王鸿磊. 金耳类酵母型菌株分离与高产胞外多糖培养基优化. 浙江农业学报. 2023(05): 1154-1160 .
9.	桑雨梅，高郁超，武济萍，葛少钦，薛宏坤. 食用真菌多糖提取、纯化及结构表征研究进展. 食品研究与开发. 2023(13): 210-218 .
10.	郑伊琦，张安强，张小军，梅光明，何鹏飞. 响应面优化猪苓菌核多糖超声辅助提取工艺及抗氧化活性分析. 食品工业科技. 2023(16): 255-263 . 本站查看
11.	杨敏，奚军伟. 黑藜麦多糖超声辅助提取工艺及其抗氧化活性、稳定性研究. 湖北农业科学. 2023(08): 160-166 .
12.	王常贵，谭智杰，张巧毅，赵柔，黄婷，林元山. 一株产多糖真菌的筛选、鉴定与发酵条件优化（英文）. Agricultural Science & Technology. 2023(03): 54-62 .
13.	宋鹏炜，孙畅，丁强，王鸿磊. 裂褶菌高产胞外多糖发酵培养基优化及生物活性研究. 饲料研究. 2023(22): 86-91 .
14.	李静，李雪婷，刘人鸣，王羽，朴京培，郭海勇. 榆耳主要活性成分及其生物学功能研究进展. 食品研究与开发. 2023(24): 193-200 .
15.	秦瑞博，成玉飞，陈嫒，文明佳，何嘉，杜昕. 表面活性剂辅助酶法提取茶树菇多糖工艺研究. 生物化工. 2023(06): 80-84+101 .
16.	杨彤，孙静，郝宸，王建瑞，刘宇. 盐胁迫下六妹羊肚菌菌丝体的理化性状. 食品与发酵工业. 2022(18): 162-167 .
17.	冯小飞，朗丹，寸孟人，胡珊苑，余浪，杨斌. 2株野生木耳液体培养方法优化及其胞内多糖的抗氧化活性分析. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2022(05): 96-103 .
18.	莫翠园，盛丽，刘若凡，郝梅，马爱民. 虎奶菇多糖提取工艺优化、结构鉴定及抗氧化活性研究. 食品科技. 2022(09): 156-163 .
19.	李兴恺，张耀根，姚皓昱，丁一飞，王诗雨，王燕玲，孙涛，雷鹏，徐虹，王瑞. 毛韧革菌胞外多糖的结构表征、抗氧化活性研究及发酵条件优化. 食品与发酵工业. 2022(21): 36-41 .
20.	梅承翰，张丽英，张冰梅，陈蓓蓓. 红托竹荪多糖组分和生物活性研究进展. 中国食用菌. 2022(11): 8-11+17 .