Effect of Ultra-High Pressure Combined with Enzymatic Hydrolysis on the Quality of Red Jujube Juice

ZHU Junzhe; CAI Wenchao; ZHANG Zhendong; SHAN Chunhui; GUO Zhuang

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070355

Volume 42 Issue 13

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(13): 39-44. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070355

ZHU Junzhe, CAI Wenchao, ZHANG Zhendong, et al. Effect of Ultra-High Pressure Combined with Enzymatic Hydrolysis on the Quality of Red Jujube Juice[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(13): 39−44. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070355.

Citation:

PDF (1099 KB)

Effect of Ultra-High Pressure Combined with Enzymatic Hydrolysis on the Quality of Red Jujube Juice

1.
Hubei Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center for Food Ingredients, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China
2.
The Food College of Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China

More Information

Received Date: July 28, 2020
Available Online: April 27, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Five different pressures were used to prepare red jujube juice based on ultra-high pressure (UHP) re-enzymolysis, enzymolysis re-UHP and enzymolysis only. Combined with bionic equipment such as electronic tongue, electronic nose and colorimeter and multivariate statistics, the sensory quality of 33 red jujube juice samples was evaluated. The differences were analyzed by principal component analysis, canonical correspondence analysis, cluster analysis, redundancy analysis and multivariate variance analysis. The above analysis methods showed that UHP re-enzymolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis re-UHP had more influence on the quality of red jujube juice than pressure, and the overall quality of red jujube juice after UHP treatment was close, and there was a significant difference in sensory quality between the two groups and enzymatic hydrolysis only (P<0.001). Redundancy analysis proved the difference was mainly caused by flavor indexes such as aromatic substances, alkanes and sulfides, and the quality of jujube juice prepared by UHP after enzymolysis was better. Meanwhile, it was found that UHP treatment was helpful to improve the non-biological stability of jujube juice. Therefore, UHP treatment can obviously improve the quality of jujube juice.
- red jujube,
- ultra-high pressure technology,
- quality,
- electronic tongue,
- electronic nose

FullText(HTML)

References (25)

References

[1]	蒋卉, 韩爱芝, 蔡雨晴, 等. 新疆引进红枣中微量元素和重金属含量的测定与聚类分析[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(6):199−203. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606036
[2]	Souleymane A A. Potential benefits of jujube (Zizyphus Lotus L.) bioactive compounds for nutrition and health[J]. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism,2016,12(7):1−13.
[3]	Gao Q H, Wu C S, Wang M. The jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) fruit: A review of current knowledge of fruit composition and health benefits[J]. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry,2013,61(14):3351−3363.
[4]	Li J W, Fan L P, Ding S D, et al. Nutritional composition of five cultivars of Chinese jujube[J]. Food Chemistry,2007,103(2):454−460. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.016
[5]	李树萍, 邱诗棋, 吴宛芹, 等. 气相色谱-嗅闻-质谱联用分析红枣白兰地风味成分[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(4):187−191. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201704030
[6]	Hyun S H, Kim S W, Seo H W, et al. Physiological and pharmacological features of the non-saponin components in Korean Red Ginseng[J]. Journal of Ginseng Research,2020,44(4):1−12.
[7]	张越锋, 李福燕, 吴瑛. 红枣多糖及红枣硒多糖抗氧化活性的比较研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2015,36(3):4−9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2015.03.002
[8]	张艳. 红枣热风干燥工艺与技术研究[D]. 郑州: 中原工学院, 2018.
[9]	Xi Meili, LiZhixi, Wang Xiaotie, et al. Extraction technology of red jujube fruit juice by using of enzyme[J]. Acta AgriculturaeBoreali-occidentalisSinica,2002,11(4):52−54.
[10]	谢爱娣, 李从军, 张胜. 复合型桂花红枣酒生产工艺的研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(14):113−118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2017.14.024
[11]	Jiang Minghua, Li Yi. Study on the antioxidation of the compound beverage of winter jujube and peanut meal[J]. Chinese Food Science,2012,1(2):17−19.
[12]	张丽华, 李珍珠, 王维静, 等. 不同杀菌方式对低醇枣酒品质的影响[J]. 中国酿造,2018,37(12):106−111. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2018.12.021
[13]	张如意, 宋志强, 刘银兰, 等. 红枣葡萄果酒酿造工艺研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(5):138−142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2017.05.029
[14]	崔艳敏, 孟宪军, 王铭悦, 等. 超高压技术在苹果汁加工中应用的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2019,31(6):52−57.
[15]	邓红, 雷佳蕾, 杨天歌, 等. 超高压和高温短时杀菌对NFC苹果汁贮藏期品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(21):3903−3923. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.21.018
[16]	Zoltán Kovács, László Sipos, Dániel Szllsi, et al. Electronic tongue and sensory evaluation for sensing apple juice taste attributes[J]. Sensor Letters,2011,9(4):1273−1281. doi: 10.1166/sl.2011.1687
[17]	Qiu S, Wang J. The prediction of food additives in the fruit juice based on electronic nose with chemometrics[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,230(1):208−214.
[18]	Pereira A L F, Maciel T C, Rodrigues S. Probiotic beverage from cashew apple juice fermented with Lactobacillus casei[J]. Food Research International,2011,44(5):1276−1283. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.11.035
[19]	郭文娟. 复合酶解法浸提红枣汁工艺研究[J]. 农产品加工,2017(13):20−22.
[20]	赵芸, 张连慧, 应欣, 等. 不同亲水胶体对芒果汁饮料稳定性的影响[J]. 粮油食品科技,2020,28(4):54−58.
[21]	杨成聪, 蔡宏宇, 王玉荣, 等. 基于电子舌技术的市售苏打水滋味品质评价[J]. 食品研究与开发,2016,37(10):134−137. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2016.10.034
[22]	代程洋, 陈江红, 郭壮, 等. 枣阳酸浆水来源乳酸菌对泡菜及泡菜水发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国酿造,2019,38(5):54−58. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.05.011
[23]	周书楠, 杨成聪, 郭志鹏, 等. 基于主成分和聚类分析的不同乳酸杆菌制备酸浆水品质评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(23):242−246.
[24]	王菲, 钟小丹, 戴彩霞, 等. 原料米和酒曲对米酒滋味品质影响的评价[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(20):80−84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2017.20.016
[25]	童红甘, 王武, 张华锋, 等. HPLC、GC-MS结合多元统计分析方法探究不同地区板鸭风味差异[J]. 现代食品科技,2018,34(12):228−238.

[1]	SUN Renjie, HE Qin, WU Dezhi. Visual Analysis of Dendrobium candidum Related Research Based on CiteSpace Knowledge Map and Patent Bibliometrics[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(20): 322-330. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022120168
[2]	SU Qingyu, CHANG Xiaomin, LIU Yaran, XU Xiaoqing, LI Jiaze, ZHU Yuxuan, SONG Hao, ZHU Baoqing. Current Status Research of Projective Mapping in Food Research and Development[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(16): 390-399. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021070202
[3]	YANG Xin, QIN Lina, JIANG Xianzhang. Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in the Genome of Trichoderma reesei[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(6): 141-149. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021110338
[4]	WANG Zu-lian, CHEN Qing, GAO Jia, LUO Fang-yao, TANG Yue-ming, TIAN Yu-xiao, GUO Yun-jian. Effect of Packaging Film Permeability on the Quality of MAP Storage of Hotbed Chives during Cold Storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(1): 304-311. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020030031
[5]	ZHOU Ting, HE Dan, HUANG Hui, HAO Shu-xian, LI Lai-hao, WEI Ya, CEN Jian-wei. Effect and analysis of MAP on volatile flavor compounds in sturgeon(Huso dauricused × sturger schrenckii) caviar[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (15): 260-264. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.15.042
[6]	WANG Dong, WANG Zhe- di, MA Yue, LI Qi. Impact of serving conditions on consumer preferences for Chinese rice wine[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (03): 127-130. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.03.018
[7]	JIANG Li-hong, ZHOU Ying-zhe, HONG Qing, LIU Xiao-ming, TIAN Feng-wei, ZHAO Jian-xin, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Wei. Flavor characteristics and consumer preference for the commercial aged Cheddar cheese[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (23): 275-281. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.23.050
[8]	CHANG Xiang-yang, HU Hao. Research of consumer behavior for food safety attributes in the view of choice experiment[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (11): 273-277. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.11.051
[9]	Research on preservation effect influence of pre-preparing method on fresh beef products packaged in MAP[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (02): 310-314. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.02.080
[10]	Research on quadric orthogonal regression experiment on MAP craft of waxberry[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2012, (19): 326-328. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.19.066

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	杨蕾，冯洪涛，何雪峰，杨乾栩，蒋梦菲，张涛. 基于MFA的消费者与专家卷烟抽吸感知及风味感知分析. 中国市场. 2024(28): 99-102 .
2.	常晓敏，赵慧敏，张悦，刘佳妮，李玄烨，李晓龙，初柏君，王翔宇，朱保庆. 桌布法结合极化投影地图法剖析葵花籽油香味特征. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2023(13): 184-192 .
3.	侯姣靓. XLSTAT在感官评价数据分析中的应用. 上海轻工业. 2023(03): 130-133 .
4.	单冰淇，刘松昱，王春光，游睿晗，宋昊，钟葵，史波林，朱保庆. 开放式提问调查在食品研究与开发中的研究现状. 食品工业科技. 2022(12): 468-474 . 本站查看
5.	陈亦新，兰义宾，问亚琴，刘雅冉，陈奎汛，宋昊，朱保庆. 自选特性排序剖面法在食品研究与开发中的应用及研究现状. 食品工业科技. 2022(13): 475-483 . 本站查看
6.	苏庆宇，常晓敏，刘雅冉，许晓青，李佳泽，朱雨萱，宋昊，朱保庆. 投影地图法在食品研究与开发中的研究现状. 食品工业科技. 2022(16): 390-399 . 本站查看