Science and Technology of Food Industry

ISSN 1002-0306
CN   11-1759/TS
High-quality sci-tech periodicals
Menu
Volume 42 Issue 9
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
MA Yanan, KONG Weizhou, MA Lu, et al. Effect of Fermentation and Adding Chicken Fat on the Nutritional Properties and Flavor of Venison Jerky[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(9): 60−69. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/ j.issn1002-0306.2020070263.
Citation: MA Yanan, KONG Weizhou, MA Lu, et al. Effect of Fermentation and Adding Chicken Fat on the Nutritional Properties and Flavor of Venison Jerky[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(9): 60−69. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/ j.issn1002-0306.2020070263.
shu

Effect of Fermentation and Adding Chicken Fat on the Nutritional Properties and Flavor of Venison Jerky

  • 1.

    College of Food and Wine, Ningxia Univercity, Yinchuan 750000, China

  • 2.

    Guangzhou Business College, Foshan 528131, China

  • 3.

    College of Agriculture, Ningxia Univercity, Yinchuan 750000, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2020
  • Available Online: February 26, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • To improve the quality and flavor defects of the traditional fermented venison jerky, so, a certain amount of chicken fat is added to the fermented venison jerky with a complex starter (Pentose tablet coccus: Staphylococcus xylosus: Lactobacillus plantarum=2:2:1). In this paper, differences were compared in nutritional characteristics and flavor of three groups of venison jerky(no fermentation without fat, fermentation without fat, and fermentation with fat). The results showed that the optimal added amount of chicken fat was 2% by sensory comprehensive analysis; L* value of group of fermentation with fat was 20.13 and the group of no fermentation without fat was 19.67, with no significant difference (P > 0.05), but both a* value (7.73) and b* value (9.29) were significantly higher than a* value (1.58) and b* value (2.34) of the no fermentation group without fat (P<0.05). The water content of the group that fermentation with fat(15.22%) and no fermentation without fat (21.33%) was significantly highter than the group of the fermentation with no fat(14.1%) (P<0.05). The pH of the fermentation with fat group (5.04) was significantly lower than that of the no fermentation without fat group (5.89) and the fermentation without fat group (5.28). Hardness of fermentation with fat group (5071.22%) was significantly lower than that of no fermentation without fat group (21143.94%) and fermentation without fat group (10324.73%). Fatty acids in the fermentation with fat group (7.229 mg/100 g) were significantly higher than those in the no fermentation without fat group (2.635 mg/100 g) and the fermentation without fat group (3.591 mg/100 g) (P<0.05). Amino acids in the fermentation with fat group (12.218%) were significantly higher than those in the no fermentation without fat group (8.43%) and the fermentation without fat group (10.213%) (P<0.05).The relative olefin contents of volatile substances in the fermentation without fat and fermentation with fat groups were 66.06% and 55.85%, respectively, with significant differences (P<0.05), and the contents of aldeums, acids and alkanes were significantly increased (P<0.05). The content of aldehydes, acids and alkanes increased significantly (P<0.05), while the content of alcohols and heterocyclic compounds decreased significantly (P<0.05).In conclusion, the addition of chicken fat has a positive effect on the quality of fermented venison jerky, which highlights the nutritional properties and flavor of fermented venison jerky.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (53)
  • [1]
    Ludwiczak A, Bykowska-Maciejewska M, Składanowska-Baryza J, et al. Influence of the method of storage on the quality of venison from wild fallow deer (Dama dama)[J]. Meat Science,2019,156:98−104. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.021
    [2]
    林伟欣, 鞠贵春, 张爱武. 鹿肉的营养特性与生产概况[J]. 经济动物学报,2014,18(4):228−232, 237.
    [3]
    袁琴琴, 刘文营. 鹿肉及其产品加工现状与趋势[J]. 食品研究与开发,2020,41(11):219−224.
    [4]
    任玲. 鹿肉猪肉复合发酵香肠的发酵与贮藏特性研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2011.
    [5]
    于静洋, 陈皇女, 夏书芹, 等. 制备鸡肉香精用的鸡脂酶解—温和氧化条件研究[J]. 食品与机械,2018,34(8):39−44.
    [6]
    陈星. 酸辣猪肉干加工工艺及产品特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
    [7]
    国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB 5009.3-2016 文后参考文献著录规则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [8]
    王志江, 吴小勇, 陈丽香. 地瓜猪肉干加工工艺研究[J]. 肉类工业,2015(8):8−11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5467.2015.08.004
    [9]
    国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. GB 5009.168-2016 文后参考文献著录规则[S]. 北京: 2016.
    [10]
    国家食品药品监督管理总局, 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB 5009.124-2016, 文后参考文献著录规则[S]. 北京: 2016.
    [11]
    丁晔, 刘敦华, 雷建刚, 等. 不同处理羊羔肉挥发性风味物质的比较及主成分分析[J]. 食品与机械,2013(3):16−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5788.2013.03.005
    [12]
    陈星. 酸辣猪肉干加工工艺及产品特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
    [13]
    刘树兴, 朱莉莉, 张书猛. 氧化鸡脂肪制备鸡肉香精前体物的研究[J]. 中国油脂,2012,37(2):38−42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2012.02.010
    [14]
    杨曦, 程群, 刘江, 等. 脂质自由基诱导氧化对花生蛋白功能特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020,46(10):87−91.
    [15]
    夏秀芳, 张金铎, 孔保华. 木糖葡萄球菌添加量对发酵牛肉串品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2013(7):47−50. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201307011
    [16]
    朱宏星, 孙冲, 王道营, 等. 肌红蛋白理化性质及肉色劣变影响因素研究进展[J]. 肉类研究,2019,33(6):55−63.
    [17]
    王德宝, 马文淑, 王柏辉, 等. 成熟时间对燕麦羊肉香肠食用品质、脂质氧化及风味物质积累的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020,46(11):191−198.
    [18]
    Thanonkaew A, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, et al. The effect of metal ions on lipid oxidation, colour and physicochemical properties of cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) subjected to multiple freeze–thaw cycles[J]. Food Chemistry,2006,95(4):591−599. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.040
    [19]
    王德宝, 孙学颖, 王柏辉, 等. 复合发酵剂对羊肉香肠发酵成熟过程中理化品质及安全性能的影响[J]. 中国食品学报,2020,20(6):137−145.
    [20]
    田星, 张越, 汤兴宇, 等. 基于电子舌和气相色谱-离子迁移谱分析脂肪添加量对中式香肠风味的影响[J]. 肉类研究,2020,34(5):33−40.
    [21]
    吴雪燕, 张培培, 汪淼, 等. 中式香肠蛋白氧化降解对产品品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2014,35(14):151−156.
    [22]
    程健博, 丁健, 常虹, 等. 基于核磁法构建纯菌发酵牛肉干烘干过程评价方法[J]. 食品工业科技,2017(5):277−281, 307.
    [23]
    李银, 李侠, 张春晖, 等. 羟自由基导致肉类肌原纤维蛋白氧化和凝胶性降低[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(12):286−292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.12.036
    [24]
    Benito M J, Rodriguez M, Cordoba M G, et al. Effect of the fungal protease EPg222 on proteolysis and texture in the dry fermented sausage ‘salchichon’[J]. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture,2005,85(2):273−280.
    [25]
    刘兴余, 金邦荃, 詹巍, 等. 猪肉质构的仪器测定与感官评定之间的相关性分析[J]. 食品科学,2007(4):245−248. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2007.04.056
    [26]
    陈磊, 王金勇, 李学伟. 仪器测定的猪肉质构性状与感官性状的回归分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2010,26(6):357−362. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.06.062
    [27]
    He X, Liu R, Nirasawa S, et al. Effect of high voltage electrostatic field treatment on thawing characteristics and post-thawing quality of frozen pork tenderloin meat[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2013,115(2):245−250. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.10.023
    [28]
    韦诚, 常荣, 段珍珍, 等. 发酵时长对酸肉物理特性及食用安全性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2019,45(8):86−92.
    [29]
    肖作兵, 吴旻玲, 牛云蔚. 温控氧化鸡脂对脂肪酸组成及鸡肉香基风味的影响[J]. 中国食品学报,2016,16(9):144−150.
    [30]
    韩云飞, 翟钰佳, 郭骏飞, 等. 复配发酵剂对羊肉发酵香肠脂肪氧化及脂肪酸组成的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2019,45(11):99−105.
    [31]
    王柏辉, 靳志敏, 刘夏炜, 等. 羊肉半干发酵香肠在发酵和成熟过程中游离脂肪酸变化研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(7):64−68.
    [32]
    孙学颖, 马丹, 靳烨, 等. 不同发酵剂对羊肉发酵香肠脂肪分解的影响[J]. 食品科技,2019,44(3):124−130.
    [33]
    李辉, 易恒洁, 彭邦星, 等. 贵妃鸡肌肉脂肪酸的GC-MS分析[J]. 广东农业科学,2014,41(1):96−97, 102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2014.01.024
    [34]
    陈韬, 葛长荣, 黄启超. 云南三个地方品种山羊肉脂中脂肪酸的比较[J]. 中国草食动物,2004(3):10−11.
    [35]
    高沛. 酸鱼发酵过程中微生物的产酯增香机制研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2017.
    [36]
    Casaburi A, Monaco R D, Cavella S, et al. Proteolytic and lipolytic starter cultures and their effect on traditional fermented sausages ripening and sensory traits[J]. Food Microbiology,2008,25(2):335−347. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.10.006
    [37]
    韦友兵, 吴香, 周辉, 等. 萨拉米香肠发酵成熟过程中蛋白质水解及脂质氧化规律[J]. 食品科学,2019,40(20):67−73. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20181101-008
    [38]
    孙为正. 广式腊肠加工过程中脂质水解、蛋白质降解及风味成分变化研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2011.
    [39]
    李素, 其美次仁, 王守伟, 等. 当雄牦牛肉的营养和风味特性[J]. 肉类研究,2020,34(3):39−44.
    [40]
    Cordoba J J, Antequera T, Garcia C, et al. Evolution of free amino acids and amines during ripening of Iberian cured ham[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1994,42(10):2296−2301. doi: 10.1021/jf00046a040
    [41]
    Jie-Ting G, Kigen T, Toshiki K, et al. Relationship among pH, generation of free amino acids, and Maillard browning of dried Japanese common squid Todarodes pacificus meat[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,283(14):324−330.
    [42]
    张春晖, 夏双梅. 顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱分析发酵香肠挥发性成分[J]. 分析科学学报,2005(3):262−264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6144.2005.03.008
    [43]
    辛晓琦, 张家起, 赵丽华, 等. 羊肉发酵香肠中亚硝酸盐和亚硝胺含量变化的研究[J]. 食品科技,2019,44(4):117−122.
    [44]
    章天婵, 王路瑶. 肉制品中杂环胺形成因素及抑制方法研究进展[J]. 肉类研究,2020,34(4):94−99.
    [45]
    常海军, 周文斌, 朱建飞. 重庆城口香肠挥发性风味成分的分离与鉴定[J]. 食品科学,2016(6):146−152. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606026
    [46]
    李文采, 刘英丽, 张慧娟, 等. HS-SPME-GC/MS分析两种萨拉米香肠中挥发性化合物[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(7):295−303.
    [47]
    杜喜玲. 气质色谱法测定发酵肉风味物质的研究[J]. 肉类工业,2012(4):18−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5467.2012.04.009
    [48]
    Gianelli M P, Salazar V, Mojica L, et al. Volatile compounds present in traditional meat products (charqui and longaniza sausage) in Chile[J]. Brazilian Archives of Biology & Technology,2012,55(4):603−612.
    [49]
    Xiao Y, Liu Y N, Chen C G, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus xylosus on flavour development and bacterial communities in Chinese dry fermented sausages[J]. Food Research International, 2020.135: 109247.
    [50]
    吉莉莉, 王卫, 赵志平, 等. 传统四川腊肠及浅发酵香肠调料特性研究[J]. 中国调味品,2020,45(7):25−31.
    [51]
    王琦, 岳大鹏, 王然然, 等. 风干金鲳鱼制品加工过程中脂质氧化和挥发性成分的变化[J/OL]. 食品工业科技: 1−12[2020-08-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1759.TS.20200727.1511.016.html.
    [52]
    Hu Y, Zhang L, Liu Q, et al. The potential correlation between bacterial diversity and the characteristic volatile flavour of traditional dry sausages from Northeast China[J]. Food Microbiology,2020,91:103505. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103505
    [53]
    Madruga M S, Elmore J S, Dodson A T, et al. Volatile flavour profile of goat meat extracted by three widely used techniques[J]. Food Chemistry,2009,115(3):1081−1087. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.065
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(24)

    1. 张娜，刘丽，李璐，吕京京，董益阳. 青胶蒲公英根多酚超声辅助提取工艺优化及其体外抗氧化、降糖活性. 食品工业科技. 2024(17): 200-208 . 本站查看
    2. 李梅婷，赵泽帆，张晓静，陈宝怡，卢乐怡，张喆，董林欣，王静，肖国丹，张绮玥. 余甘子多酚提取工艺优化研究. 质量安全与检验检测. 2024(04): 85-91 .
    3. 郝晓华，宋雅林，刘可心. 响应面法优化酸提取荷叶中生物碱的工艺研究. 太原师范学院学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 56-64 .
    4. 李泽洋，黄华，肖善芳，郭松. 半边风多酚提取工艺优化及其抗氧化和抗菌活性研究. 饲料研究. 2024(19): 102-107 .
    5. 李宏，唐中伟，袁建琴，刘亚令，李友莲. 正交设计与响应面法优化甘草多糖提取工艺的研究. 轻工科技. 2023(01): 4-9 .
    6. 张腊腊，胡浩斌，韩明虎，王玉峰，武芸. 响应面优化黄花菜多酚提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究. 中国食品添加剂. 2023(02): 102-108 .
    7. 郑佳，王军茹，张根生，马书青. 花楸果多酚物质提取及抗氧化性的研究. 中国林副特产. 2023(01): 9-14 .
    8. 赵敏，战祥，徐茜，李泽璠，周立新. 响应面法优化五倍子多酚的提取工艺. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 294-300 .
    9. 陈婷，段宙位. 柠檬皮中多酚的超声辅助提取及其抗氧化性研究. 食品科技. 2023(02): 246-252 .
    10. 张园园，刘畅，邵颖，肖付刚. 信阳茶油提取工艺优化及脂肪酸组成分析. 食品研究与开发. 2023(13): 153-159 .
    11. 林志銮，张传海. 多花黄精多酚工艺条件优化及其抗氧化活性评价. 广州化工. 2023(08): 45-49+73 .
    12. 苏泾涵，王改萍，刘玉华，戚亚，彭大庆，李守科，曹福亮. 叶用文冠果总多酚提取工艺及抗氧化活性分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 129-137 .
    13. 李科鹏，冯玉会，普开仙，李锐扬，戴应淑，师伟，李琛. 正红菇多酚的提取及抗氧化性能研究. 广州化工. 2023(19): 11-15 .
    14. 张立攀，王俊朋，钱佳英，赵梦瑶，李冰，王春杰，胡桂芳，王法云，王永. 超声辅助法提取牡丹花中总黄酮和总多酚的工艺优化. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2022(02): 567-575 .
    15. 王燕，刘书伟，张田田，侯亚楠，沈梦霞. 槟榔多酚提取工艺的优化. 海南热带海洋学院学报. 2022(02): 25-31 .
    16. 吴卫成，忻晓庭，张程程，刘大群，卢立志，胡宏海，章检明，张治国，郭阳. 番薯叶多酚提取工艺优化及其生物活性研究. 中国食品学报. 2022(05): 189-199 .
    17. 仵菲，买里得尔·叶拉里，白红进. 响应面法优化库尔勒香梨各部位总多酚提取工艺及抗氧化活性研究. 塔里木大学学报. 2022(02): 16-23 .
    18. 王琳，冉佩灵，熊双丽，李安林. 超高压腌制对烤制猪肉品质的影响. 食品工业科技. 2022(15): 19-26 . 本站查看
    19. 舒玉凤，卢静静，陈旭. 蒲公英多糖提取及其抗氧化活性研究. 现代农业科技. 2022(15): 186-189+193 .
    20. 马妮，刘慧燕，方海田，胡海明，辛世华，杨小萍，刘洪涛. 红枣多酚提取工艺优化、成分及抗氧化活性分析. 食品工业科技. 2022(16): 246-254 . 本站查看
    21. 舒玉凤，卢静静，陈旭. 超声辅助法提取蒲公英多糖及抗氧化活性研究. 农产品加工. 2022(13): 42-46 .
    22. 张星和，侯洪波，邹章玉，冯李院，汪玉洁. 高黎贡山紫果西番莲果皮中原花青素的提取工艺及其稳定性. 食品研究与开发. 2022(20): 147-155 .
    23. 林宝妹，邱珊莲，吴妙鸿，张帅，李海明，洪佳敏. 嘉宝果果皮多酚提取工艺优化及生物活性测定. 江苏农业科学. 2021(21): 191-196 .
    24. 宋姗姗，杨艾华，王微微，徐东林，杨倩军，陈杨，林子涵，王小敏. 火炭母提取物抗氧化性及稳定性研究. 中国食品添加剂. 2021(12): 23-30 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (231) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(30)
    Address：No. 70, Shazikou Road, Yongding gate, BeijingPostcode：100101
    Tel：010-87244116 87244117Fax :010-87287944
    RSS Email Alert

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return