Science and Technology of Food Industry

ISSN 1002-0306
CN   11-1759/TS
High-quality sci-tech periodicals
Menu
Volume 42 Issue 7
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
WANG Dan, LIANG Jin, HUANG Tianzi, et al. Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050240.
Citation: WANG Dan, LIANG Jin, HUANG Tianzi, et al. Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050240.
shu

Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

  • College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 21, 2020
  • Available Online: January 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to comprehensively evaluate the fresh food quality of the major cultivars and new varieties of kiwifruit from two strains of Chinese kiwifruit and delicious kiwifruit in Shaanxi Province, the six main varieties including Hongyang, Qihong, Jinyan, Cuixiang, Xuxiang, Hayward and the two new varieties Nongda Jinmi and Nongda Yuxiang were used as raw materials for comparing and analyzing the quality indexes such as soluble solids, dry matter, soluble sugar, titratable acid, protein, amino acid, VC, volatile matter content, hardness and color. The fresh food quality of eight varieties of kiwifruit was also comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the major cultivars of Qihong, Cuixiang, Hongyang and new variety Nongda Jinmi had higher quality because of rich fruit flavor, high content of various nutrients and volatile substances relatively. The four principal component factors extracted by principal component analysis had a cumulative variance contribution rate of 85.916%. The fresh food quality difference of 8 varieties of kiwifruit was significant. According to the clustering of varieties, the kiwifruits could be divided into 5 categories. The overall quality was ranked as Nongda Jinmi, Qihong, Cuixiang, Hongyang, Nongda Yuxiang, Hayward, Xuxiang and Jinyan. Qihong, Cuixiang and Hongyang were the varieties with better quality among the main varieties. The comprehensive quality of the new variety Nongda Jinmi was better than the major cultivars. The study provided a reference for the selection of high quality varieties in kiwifruit consumption, planting and storage.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (32)
  • [1]
    薛敏, 高贵田, 赵金梅, 等. 不同品种猕猴桃果实游离氨基酸主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2014,35(5):294−298.
    [2]
    Richardson D P, Ansell J, Drummond L N. The nutritional and health attributes of kiwifruit: A review[J]. European Journal of Nutrition,2018,57(8):2659−2676. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1627-z
    [3]
    Ainalidou A, Karamanoli K, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U, et al. CPPU treatment and pollination: Their combined effect on kiwifruit growth and quality[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2015,193:147−154. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.011
    [4]
    Luo A W, Bai J Q, Li R, et al. Difference of resistance to postharvest blue mold between Hongyang and Qihong kiwifruits[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,285:389−396. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.112
    [5]
    Salazar J, Jorquera C, Campos-Vargas R, et al. Effect of the application timing of 1-MCP on postharvest traits and sensory quality of a yellow-fleshed kiwifruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,244:82−87. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.028
    [6]
    王颖颖, 侯利霞, 胡爱鹏, 等. 主成分分析法评价市售芝麻酱产品品质[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(6):310−314. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201706048
    [7]
    Nie B, Du J, Liu H, et al. Crowds' classification using hierarchical cluster, rough sets, principal component analysis and its combination[C]// International Forum on Computer Science-technology & Applications. IEEE Computer Society, 2009, 1: 287-290.
    [8]
    曲雪艳, 郎彬彬, 钟敏, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(1):92−96. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060025
    [9]
    杨军林, 任亚梅, 张武岗, 等. 基于主成分分析法的熟化马铃薯品质评价[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(19):70−77. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201819012
    [10]
    蒋卉, 丁慧萍, 白红进. 新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(3):55−59. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201603011
    [11]
    肖守华, 马德源, 王施慧, 等. 不同瓤色小型西瓜成熟果实挥发性风味物质GC-MS分析[J]. 中国园艺文摘,2014,30(5):1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2014.05.001
    [12]
    袁婷, 陈薇薇, 孙海艳, 等. 不同果肉类型枇杷果肉挥发性成分分析[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(24):209−217. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201824032
    [13]
    姚春潮, 刘占德. 黄肉猕猴桃新品种: 农大金猕[J]. 中国果业信息,2017(11):65.
    [14]
    郁俊谊. 猕猴桃新品种‘农大郁香’[J]. 北方果树,2018(3):49.
    [15]
    王依, 雷靖, 陈成, 等. 美味猕猴桃新品种‘瑞玉’果实品质综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(10):101−107, 125.
    [16]
    李国秀, 刘小宁, 李劼. 高效液相色谱法测定猕猴桃中的VC含量[J]. 保鲜与加工,2016,16(5):89−93.
    [17]
    魏明英. 红阳猕猴桃中VC含量测定方法研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2014,35(23):115−117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2014.23.031
    [18]
    葛翠莲, 刘科鹏, 曲雪艳, 等. 不同类型猕猴桃果实发育过程中糖、酸和VC含量的动态变化(英文)[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology,2013,14(12):1772−1774, 1778.
    [19]
    黄娟, 李新建. 基于色差仪法的库尔勒香梨果实颜色分级标准[J]. 北方园艺,2018(17):38−44.
    [20]
    马婷, 任亚梅, 张艳宜, 等. 1-MCP处理对‘亚特’猕猴桃果实香气的影响[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(2):276−281. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201602049
    [21]
    赵治兵, 王金华, 刘永玲, 等. 基于主成分分析法研究氯吡脲对猕猴桃品质的影响[J]. 食品工业,2018,39(9):190−193.
    [22]
    袁华玲, 周亚兰, 陈延松, 等. 不同品种黄肉猕猴桃品质分析[J]. 合肥师范学院学报,2016,34(6):50−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2273.2016.06.012
    [23]
    李文生, 石磊, 王宝刚, 等. 不同颜色果肉猕猴桃营养品质的比较[J]. 食品科技,2012,37(7):47−48, 52.
    [24]
    栾霞, 李秀娟, 郭咪咪. 湘西猕猴桃籽成分分析及猕猴桃籽油的特性研究[J]. 中国油脂,2017,42(8):136−139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2017.08.030
    [25]
    叶发荣, 韩秀梅, 肖钧, 等. ‘红阳’猕猴桃果实氨基酸含量及组成分析[J]. 中国园艺文摘,2015,31(8):1−3, 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2015.08.001
    [26]
    王彬, 郑伟, 李兴忠, 等. 不同品种(系)火龙果果实中氨基酸含量及组成分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2012,40(3):283−286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.03.109
    [27]
    常培培, 张静, 杨建华, 等. 紫色番茄果实挥发性风味物质分析[J]. 食品科学,2014,35(14):165−169. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201414032
    [28]
    Mayuoni-Kirshinbaum L, Daus A, Porat R. Changes in sensory quality and aroma volatile composition during prolonged storage of ‘Wonderful’ pomegranate fruit[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2013,48(8):1569−1578.
    [29]
    吴文艳, 陈健乐, 陈荣荣, 等. HS-SPME-GC/MS结合PCA分析不同成熟度东魁杨梅香气组分差异[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(12):236−242.
    [30]
    李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(6):161−171.
    [31]
    Gentile C, Di Gregorio E, di Stefano V, et al. Food quality and nutraceutical value of nine cultivars of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits grown in Mediterranean subtropical environment[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,277:471−479. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.109
    [32]
    Hao J, Gao L H, Tang X W, et al. Comparison in quality characters of five different tomato cultivars[J]. Acta Horticulturae,2010(856):133−140.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (429) PDF downloads (71) Cited by()
    Address：No. 70, Shazikou Road, Yongding gate, BeijingPostcode：100101
    Tel：010-87244116 87244117Fax :010-87287944
    RSS Email Alert

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return