Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

Dan WANG; Jin LIANG; Tianzi HUANG; Lu ZHANG; Rui LI; Ruijuan LI; Shuxia YANG; Anwei LUO

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050240

Volume 42 Issue 7

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(7): 1-8. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050240

WANG Dan, LIANG Jin, HUANG Tianzi, et al. Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(7): 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050240.

Citation:

PDF (786 KB)

Fresh Food Quality Evaluation of Kiwifruit Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China

More Information

Received Date: May 21, 2020
Available Online: January 27, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to comprehensively evaluate the fresh food quality of the major cultivars and new varieties of kiwifruit from two strains of Chinese kiwifruit and delicious kiwifruit in Shaanxi Province, the six main varieties including Hongyang, Qihong, Jinyan, Cuixiang, Xuxiang, Hayward and the two new varieties Nongda Jinmi and Nongda Yuxiang were used as raw materials for comparing and analyzing the quality indexes such as soluble solids, dry matter, soluble sugar, titratable acid, protein, amino acid, V_C, volatile matter content, hardness and color. The fresh food quality of eight varieties of kiwifruit was also comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the major cultivars of Qihong, Cuixiang, Hongyang and new variety Nongda Jinmi had higher quality because of rich fruit flavor, high content of various nutrients and volatile substances relatively. The four principal component factors extracted by principal component analysis had a cumulative variance contribution rate of 85.916%. The fresh food quality difference of 8 varieties of kiwifruit was significant. According to the clustering of varieties, the kiwifruits could be divided into 5 categories. The overall quality was ranked as Nongda Jinmi, Qihong, Cuixiang, Hongyang, Nongda Yuxiang, Hayward, Xuxiang and Jinyan. Qihong, Cuixiang and Hongyang were the varieties with better quality among the main varieties. The comprehensive quality of the new variety Nongda Jinmi was better than the major cultivars. The study provided a reference for the selection of high quality varieties in kiwifruit consumption, planting and storage.
- kiwifruit,
- variety,
- quality evaluation,
- principal component analysis,
- cluster analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (32)

References

[1]	薛敏, 高贵田, 赵金梅, 等. 不同品种猕猴桃果实游离氨基酸主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2014,35(5):294−298.
[2]	Richardson D P, Ansell J, Drummond L N. The nutritional and health attributes of kiwifruit: A review[J]. European Journal of Nutrition,2018,57(8):2659−2676. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1627-z
[3]	Ainalidou A, Karamanoli K, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U, et al. CPPU treatment and pollination: Their combined effect on kiwifruit growth and quality[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2015,193:147−154. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.011
[4]	Luo A W, Bai J Q, Li R, et al. Difference of resistance to postharvest blue mold between Hongyang and Qihong kiwifruits[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,285:389−396. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.112
[5]	Salazar J, Jorquera C, Campos-Vargas R, et al. Effect of the application timing of 1-MCP on postharvest traits and sensory quality of a yellow-fleshed kiwifruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,244:82−87. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.028
[6]	王颖颖, 侯利霞, 胡爱鹏, 等. 主成分分析法评价市售芝麻酱产品品质[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(6):310−314. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201706048
[7]	Nie B, Du J, Liu H, et al. Crowds' classification using hierarchical cluster, rough sets, principal component analysis and its combination[C]// International Forum on Computer Science-technology & Applications. IEEE Computer Society, 2009, 1: 287-290.
[8]	曲雪艳, 郎彬彬, 钟敏, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(1):92−96. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060025
[9]	杨军林, 任亚梅, 张武岗, 等. 基于主成分分析法的熟化马铃薯品质评价[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(19):70−77. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201819012
[10]	蒋卉, 丁慧萍, 白红进. 新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(3):55−59. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201603011
[11]	肖守华, 马德源, 王施慧, 等. 不同瓤色小型西瓜成熟果实挥发性风味物质GC-MS分析[J]. 中国园艺文摘,2014,30(5):1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2014.05.001
[12]	袁婷, 陈薇薇, 孙海艳, 等. 不同果肉类型枇杷果肉挥发性成分分析[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(24):209−217. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201824032
[13]	姚春潮, 刘占德. 黄肉猕猴桃新品种: 农大金猕[J]. 中国果业信息,2017(11):65.
[14]	郁俊谊. 猕猴桃新品种‘农大郁香’[J]. 北方果树,2018(3):49.
[15]	王依, 雷靖, 陈成, 等. 美味猕猴桃新品种‘瑞玉’果实品质综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(10):101−107, 125.
[16]	李国秀, 刘小宁, 李劼. 高效液相色谱法测定猕猴桃中的V_C含量[J]. 保鲜与加工,2016,16(5):89−93.
[17]	魏明英. 红阳猕猴桃中V_C含量测定方法研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2014,35(23):115−117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2014.23.031
[18]	葛翠莲, 刘科鹏, 曲雪艳, 等. 不同类型猕猴桃果实发育过程中糖、酸和V_C含量的动态变化(英文)[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology,2013,14(12):1772−1774, 1778.
[19]	黄娟, 李新建. 基于色差仪法的库尔勒香梨果实颜色分级标准[J]. 北方园艺,2018(17):38−44.
[20]	马婷, 任亚梅, 张艳宜, 等. 1-MCP处理对‘亚特’猕猴桃果实香气的影响[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(2):276−281. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201602049
[21]	赵治兵, 王金华, 刘永玲, 等. 基于主成分分析法研究氯吡脲对猕猴桃品质的影响[J]. 食品工业,2018,39(9):190−193.
[22]	袁华玲, 周亚兰, 陈延松, 等. 不同品种黄肉猕猴桃品质分析[J]. 合肥师范学院学报,2016,34(6):50−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2273.2016.06.012
[23]	李文生, 石磊, 王宝刚, 等. 不同颜色果肉猕猴桃营养品质的比较[J]. 食品科技,2012,37(7):47−48, 52.
[24]	栾霞, 李秀娟, 郭咪咪. 湘西猕猴桃籽成分分析及猕猴桃籽油的特性研究[J]. 中国油脂,2017,42(8):136−139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2017.08.030
[25]	叶发荣, 韩秀梅, 肖钧, 等. ‘红阳’猕猴桃果实氨基酸含量及组成分析[J]. 中国园艺文摘,2015,31(8):1−3, 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2015.08.001
[26]	王彬, 郑伟, 李兴忠, 等. 不同品种(系)火龙果果实中氨基酸含量及组成分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2012,40(3):283−286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.03.109
[27]	常培培, 张静, 杨建华, 等. 紫色番茄果实挥发性风味物质分析[J]. 食品科学,2014,35(14):165−169. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201414032
[28]	Mayuoni-Kirshinbaum L, Daus A, Porat R. Changes in sensory quality and aroma volatile composition during prolonged storage of ‘Wonderful’ pomegranate fruit[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2013,48(8):1569−1578.
[29]	吴文艳, 陈健乐, 陈荣荣, 等. HS-SPME-GC/MS结合PCA分析不同成熟度东魁杨梅香气组分差异[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(12):236−242.
[30]	李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(6):161−171.
[31]	Gentile C, Di Gregorio E, di Stefano V, et al. Food quality and nutraceutical value of nine cultivars of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits grown in Mediterranean subtropical environment[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,277:471−479. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.109
[32]	Hao J, Gao L H, Tang X W, et al. Comparison in quality characters of five different tomato cultivars[J]. Acta Horticulturae,2010(856):133−140.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	刘非凡，温纪平，展小彬，石松业，李柯新，唐浩洁. 冷等离子体处理在食品中的应用研究进展. 食品研究与开发. 2024(12): 181-188 .
2.	闵照永. 等离子体活化水及微波协同处理对鲜湿面片特性的影响. 食品科技. 2024(06): 180-186 .
3.	高婷，尹凯静，邵栋梁，赵丹丹，戴文娜. 低温等离子体技术杀灭食源性致病菌的研究进展. 农产品加工. 2024(14): 100-103 .
4.	方镇洲，杨体园，赵玲艳，邓洁红. 低温等离子体处理对华容大叶芥菜贮藏品质的影响. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(20): 257-262 .
5.	张腾，江昊. 超声渗透等离子活化水对香蕉切片鲜切品质的影响. 包装工程. 2023(05): 65-74 .
6.	萧文宇，吴迅，黄显斌，李玲，何志平，郭俭. 低温等离子体活化水对蓝莓表面微生物抑制作用及其贮藏品质的影响. 食品工业科技. 2023(08): 359-365 . 本站查看
7.	颜心怡，李锦晶，李赤翎，吴金鸿，俞健，王发祥，刘永乐，李向红. 冷等离子体技术对食品组分的影响及其作用机制. 食品工业科技. 2023(12): 445-454 . 本站查看
8.	李芮，宋雅琪，周丹丹，屠康. 等离子体活化水对鲜切莲藕杀菌及保鲜的影响. 食品与生物技术学报. 2023(10): 30-40 .
9.	田方，徐咏菁，孙志栋，周琦，王志远，华镇南，蔡路昀. 低温等离子体处理对鲜切猕猴桃片微观结构及理化特性的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2023(21): 167-174 .
10.	赵莹，严龙飞，严文静，章建浩. 低温等离子体活化水与介质阻挡放电联合处理对草莓冷杀菌效果及品质的影响. 食品科学. 2022(17): 105-116 .
11.	韩扬，朱成志，李沁雨，李立，马新新，赵志军，包怡红. ε-聚赖氨酸复合保鲜剂对鸡毛菜品质及微生物的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2022(18): 205-212 .
12.	白亚龙，廖小艳，崔妍. 消除鲜食生菜中细菌污染的研究进展. 食品科学. 2022(19): 367-374 .
13.	相启森，张嵘，杜桂红，王利敏，蒋爱民. 等离子体活化水对沙门氏菌的灭活作用及机制研究. 食品工业科技. 2021(08): 138-143 . 本站查看
14.	翟娅菲，田佳丽，相启森，禹晓，申瑞玲，王章存. 非热加工技术在果蔬保鲜中的应用. 食品工业. 2021(05): 327-332 .