DU Xin-mei, ZHAO Qian-cheng, LV Ke, LIU Jing-yi, CHENG Shao-feng, MA Yong-sheng. Comparison of Texture Determination Method and Correlation Analysis with Sensory Evaluation of 5 Kinds of Apple[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(22): 240-246. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019090243
Citation: DU Xin-mei, ZHAO Qian-cheng, LV Ke, LIU Jing-yi, CHENG Shao-feng, MA Yong-sheng. Comparison of Texture Determination Method and Correlation Analysis with Sensory Evaluation of 5 Kinds of Apple[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(22): 240-246. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019090243

Comparison of Texture Determination Method and Correlation Analysis with Sensory Evaluation of 5 Kinds of Apple

More Information
  • Received Date: September 23, 2019
  • Available Online: November 29, 2020
  • In order to compare different instrumental methods for determining the texture of 5 different kinds of apples, the texture of five different apple cultivars were determined by shear, penetrometer method and texture profile analysis (TPA), and influence of different test conditions on the characterization of apple texture was also studied. Meanwhile, the correlation between the instrumental parameters and sensory evaluation was analyzed. The hardness of apples could be measured and distinguished by shearing, puncturing and TPA compression. The results showed that hardness of peeled flesh ranked in order of Orin > Fuji > Ralls > Jonagold > Golden delicious. The puncture results showed that the peel had a significant effect on the texture of apple (P<0.05), and there was a significant difference in the texture of different puncture locations (P<0.05), the top part of apple showed the maximum hardness, followed by the part of shoulder and equator. The correlation analysis with sensory evaluation showed that the maximum puncture modulus was highly correlated with sensory crispness (r=0.638, P<0.01), which could be used to predict apple crispness. With the increase of deformation rate for TPA method, the tested value of apple hardness increased significantly (P<0.05), while the cohesivenss decreased significantly (P<0.05), and a 25% compression showed best correlation with sensory evaluation. This study indicated that both the puncture and TPA method were suitable for the determination of apple texture. The puncture test was significantly affected by the peel and puncture site, and the maximum puncture modulus could be used to characterize apple crispness. The TPA method had the best correlation with the sensory evaluation when the deformation rate was 25%.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(21)

    1. 薛忠,潘睿,张秀梅. 不同加载速度下巴厘菠萝果皮穿刺力学特性研究. 农机化研究. 2025(03): 169-175 .
    2. 孙静鑫,冯慧敏,许宝卉,邱述金,郭玉明. 苹果果实及果柄力学性质研究. 核农学报. 2025(05): 1030-1039 .
    3. 滕峥,杨翠凤,刘正鲁,张梦伦,王心淳,万秋萍,罗科作. 凌云牛心李果实的质地品质研究. 中国农学通报. 2025(10): 158-164 .
    4. 沈海军,徐子昂,王文琪,宇庭,曹仲文. 基于熵权法、灰色关联度法和低场核磁共振检测的苹果品质评价. 食品工业科技. 2024(01): 231-238 . 本站查看
    5. 薛晓芳,焦文丽,苏万龙,任海燕,王永康,石美娟,李登科,赵爱玲. 枣种质资源果实质地品质特性分析. 西北农业学报. 2024(07): 1318-1328 .
    6. 陈桂香,杨天天,孙蕾,朱子成,刘宏宇,王学征. 园艺作物果实硬度测量方法研究进展. 分子植物育种. 2024(17): 5817-5824 .
    7. 苏万龙,赵爱玲,王永康,付甲天,任海燕,薛晓芳,石美娟,刘丽,李毅,李登科. 枣果实质地性状多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报. 2024(11): 1830-1850 .
    8. 许薇,劳琪珍,陈振林,刘英健,姜丽蕊,宋慕波. 三华李果实的质地品质特性分析. 食品研究与开发. 2023(11): 181-187 .
    9. 潘睿,薛忠,李海亮,肖景丰. 不同品种菠萝果皮穿刺力学特性研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 86-95 .
    10. 何秀娟,仝铸,肖翠,王泽琼,徐育海,孙中海,邱文明. 基于穿刺测试和TPA法的板栗果实质地分析. 保鲜与加工. 2023(09): 59-68 .
    11. 魏智成,任兆琳,田蜜,李娜,朱文立,孙雨,吴昊,朱俊向. 气调包装联合保鲜剂对‘塞外红’苹果中短期贮藏的影响. 包装工程. 2023(21): 144-151 .
    12. 潘秋玲,李芳,江芷欣,黄建昌,宋雯佩,马焕基,李娟,李彩琴. 基于质构仪的三华李果实质地品质评价. 中国农学通报. 2023(34): 136-142 .
    13. 黎欣欣,梁言,孙文佳,熊欣,汪廷彩. 响应面法分析不同测试条件对阳桃TPA质构特性参数的影响. 食品安全导刊. 2023(33): 115-120 .
    14. 李树长,艾民珉,龙姣丽,黄诗洋,方泽豪,郭善广,范红,曹媛媛,周佺,蒋爱民. 潮汕脆性肉丸的感官评定与质构评价相关性分析. 食品工业科技. 2022(01): 62-70 . 本站查看
    15. 黄俊豪,段承煜,邓英毅,李峰,冯斗,范斗文,谷俊杰. 4个粉蕉品种后熟过程中果实色泽及质构特性变化规律比较. 热带作物学报. 2022(02): 277-284 .
    16. 胡丽丽,牛丽影,李大婧,张钟元,肖丽霞,鲁茂林. 质构仪探头选择及样品处理对草莓脯TPA测定结果的影响. 食品研究与开发. 2022(05): 170-176 .
    17. 李文丽,袁剑龙,段惠敏,蒋彤晖,刘玲玲,张峰. 马铃薯块茎质地品质的综合评价. 中国农业科学. 2022(12): 2278-2321 .
    18. 杨银爱,韩延超,牛犇,郜海燕,陈杭君. 不同成熟度莲子鲜食品质评价. 食品科学. 2022(15): 44-51 .
    19. 夏之凯,李玲,徐锡明,庞林江,吕尊富,崔鹏,陆国权. 甘薯块根膨大过程中质构特性和淀粉直/支比的研究. 中国粮油学报. 2022(08): 144-150 .
    20. 李晓,陈科冰,韩明,马雨佳,纪晓楠,楚晗. 质构仪在烟叶力学特性检测中的应用进展. 轻工学报. 2021(03): 63-69 .
    21. 蒋冰瑶,王菊霞,李涛,陈涛. 基于穿刺力学试验的苹果果肉质地评价. 农业工程. 2021(07): 57-63 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (460) PDF downloads (46) Cited by(27)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return