Effects of Natural Preservatives on the Moisture and Protein Structure Changes of Beef during Storage

XU Jing; DING Shanshan; TAO Yuting; LIU Linxin; WU Jie; PAN Leiqing

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020291

Volume 45 Issue 17

Aug. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Supplements

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2024 > 45(17): 380-387. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020291

XU Jing, DING Shanshan, TAO Yuting, et al. Effects of Natural Preservatives on the Moisture and Protein Structure Changes of Beef during Storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(17): 380−387. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020291.

Citation:

PDF (3117 KB)

Effects of Natural Preservatives on the Moisture and Protein Structure Changes of Beef during Storage

1.
School of Food and Biotechnology, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233030, China
2.
Anhui Vocational College of Grain Engineering, Hefei 230012, China
3.
College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

More Information

Received Date: February 29, 2024
Available Online: July 01, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the changes in moisture and protein structure during beef storage, the preservation effects of different natural preservatives (0.5% ε-polylysine, 0.5% tea polyphenols, 0.5% chitosan, and 0.2% ε-polylysine+0.2% tea polyphenols+0.2% chitosan) during beef storage period at 4 ℃ (12 d) were investigated in this study. Total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N), water-holding properties, water distribution and migration, protein secondary structure, hydrophobicity, and other indexes were determined. Results showed that natural preservatives could significantly reduce TVB-N (P<0.05) and reduce storage losses of beef during storage, there was no significant advantage in pressure loss between 0.5% ε-polylysine, 0.5% tea polyphenols, and 0.5% chitosan treatment groups, while composite natural preservative significantly reduced pressure loss during mid-storage period (P<0.05). Natural preservatives were able to slow down the magnitude and rate of conversion of bound water to immobile water and the magnitude of conversion of immobile water to free water, as well as delay the process of bound water migration. Natural preservatives could maintain the stability of protein secondary structure (P<0.05), significantly reduce the exposed content of hydrophobic groups (P<0.05), and alleviate the protein degradation. There was no significant difference in the maintenance of myofibrillar protein among the 0.5% ε-polylysine, 0.5% tea polyphenols and 0.5% chitosan treatment groups, and composite natural preservative was significantly better than the individual natural preservative treatment groups in maintaining the structure of myofibrillar protein. In conclusion, composite natural preservative had the best preservation and water retention effects. The research could provide a scientific theoretical basis for the application and development of composite biological preservatives in terms of preservation and water retention.
- beef,
- storage,
- composite natural preservative,
- myofibrillar protein structure,
- water migration,
- water holding capacity

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	REN B, WU W, SOLADOYE O P, et al. Application of biopreservatives in meat preservation:A review[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2021,56(12):6124−6141.
[2]	JAFARIZADEH-MALMIRI H, ANARJAN N, BERENJIAN A. Developing three-component ginger-cinnamon-cardamom composite essential oil nanoemulsion as natural food preservatives[J]. Environmental Research,2022,204:112133. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112133
[3]	PISOSCHI A M, POP A, GEORGESCU C, et al. An overview of natural antimicrobials role in food[J]. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,2018,143:922−935. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.095
[4]	NASTASI J R, KONTOGIORGOS V, DAYGON V D, et al. Pectin-based films and coatings with plant extracts as natural preservatives:A systematic review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology,2022,120:193−211.
[5]	YU H H, CHIN Y W, PAIK H D. Application of natural preservatives for meat and meat products against food-borne pathogens and spoilage bacteria:A review[J]. Foods,2021,10(10):2418. doi: 10.3390/foods10102418
[6]	SALEH E, MORSHDY A E, EL-MANAKHLY E, et al. Effects of olive leaf extracts as natural preservative on retailed poultry meat quality[J]. Foods,2020,9(8):1017. doi: 10.3390/foods9081017
[7]	WANG J, REN B, BAK K H, et al. Preservative effects of composite biopreservatives on goat meat during chilled storage:Insights into meat quality, high-throughput sequencing and molecular docking[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2023:115033.
[8]	周光宏. 肉品加工学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2008:30−35, 129−134. [ZHOU Guanghong. Meat science and technology[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2008:30−35, 129−134.] ZHOU Guanghong. Meat science and technology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008: 30−35, 129−134.
[9]	APPLE J K, YANCEY J W S. Water-holding capacity of meat[M]. The Science of Meat Quality, 2013:119−145.
[10]	康大成. 超声波辅助腌制对牛肉品质的影响及其机理研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2017:56−59,77−96. [KANG Dacheng. Effects and mechanism of ultrasound-assisted curing on the quality of beef[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017:56−59,77−96.] KANG Dacheng. Effects and mechanism of ultrasound-assisted curing on the quality of beef[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017: 56−59,77−96.
[11]	CHENG S, WANG X, YANG H, et al. Characterization of moisture migration of beef during refrigeration storage by low-field NMR and its relationship to beef quality[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2020,100(5):1940−1948. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10206
[12]	LAN W, SUN Y, CHEN M, et al. Effects of pectin combined with plant essential oils on water migration, myofibrillar proteins and muscle tissue enzyme activity of vacuum packaged large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) during ice storage[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life,2021,30:100699. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100699
[13]	卢骁, 董鹏程, 张一敏, 等. 微冻贮藏对牛肉保水性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(7):253−259. [LU Xiao, DONG Pengcheng, ZHANG Yiming, et al. Effect of superchilled storage on water-holding capacity of beef muscle[J]. Food Science,2021,42(7):253−259.] doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200330-430 LU Xiao, DONG Pengcheng, ZHANG Yiming, et al. Effect of superchilled storage on water-holding capacity of beef muscle[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42（7）: 253−259. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200330-430
[14]	LAN W, HU X, SUN X, et al. Effect of the number of freeze-thaw cycles number on the quality of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei):An emphasis on moisture migration and microstructure by LF-NMR and SEM[J]. Aquaculture and Fisheries,2020,5(4):193−200. doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2019.05.007
[15]	王盼, 何贝贝, 李志成, 等. 生物保鲜剂对冷却肉保鲜的影响[J]. 中国食品学报,2019,19(11):199−207. [WANG P, HE B B, LI Z C, et al. Effect of biological preservative on preservation of chilled pork[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2019,19(11):199−207.] WANG P, HE B B, LI Z C, et al. Effect of biological preservative on preservation of chilled pork[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2019, 19（11）: 199−207.
[16]	ZHAO S, LI N, LI Z, et al. Shelf life of fresh chilled pork as affected by antimicrobial intervention with nisin, tea polyphenols, chitosan, and their combination[J]. International Journal of Food Properties,2019,22(1):1047−1063. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2019.1625918
[17]	国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准食品中挥发性氨基氮的测定GB 5009.228—2016[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2016:3−5. [National Health and Family Planning Commission. National food safety standard-Determination of volatile amino nitrogen in food GB 5009.228-2016[S] Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2016:3−5.] National Health and Family Planning Commission. National food safety standard-Determination of volatile amino nitrogen in food GB 5009.228-2016[S] Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2016: 3−5.
[18]	李素, 王守伟, 朱宁, 等. 加工工艺对酱牛肉蛋白质结构和水分分布的影响[J]. 食品科学,2022,43(7):74−80. [LI Su, WANG Shouwei, ZHU Ning, et al. Effect of processing technology on protein structure and water distribution of spiced beef[J]. Food Science,2022,43(7):74−80.] doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210322-263 LI Su, WANG Shouwei, ZHU Ning, et al. Effect of processing technology on protein structure and water distribution of spiced beef[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43（7）: 74−80. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210322-263
[19]	KONG J, YU S. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures[J]. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica,2007,39(8):549−559. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00320.x
[20]	CHELH I, GATELLIER P, SANTÉ-LHOUTELLIER V. Technical note:A simplified procedure for myofibril hydrophobicity determination[J]. Meat science,2006,74(4):681−683. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.019
[21]	杨波若, 李华健, 苏娅宁, 等. 基于微观结构和蛋白质组学分析影响猪肉持水性的差异蛋白[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(7):136−144. [YANG Boruo, LI Huajian, SU Yaning, et al. Analysis of different proteins affecting water holding capacity of pork based on microstructure and proteomics[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(7):136−144.] YANG Boruo, LI Huajian, SU Yaning, et al. Analysis of different proteins affecting water holding capacity of pork based on microstructure and proteomics[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42（7）: 136−144.
[22]	王策. 含氧气调包装对冷却肉持水性的影响机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2018:17−31. [WANG Ce. The effect of different oxygen concentrations in modified atmosphere packaging on water holding capacity of chilled meat[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018:17−31.] WANG Ce. The effect of different oxygen concentrations in modified atmosphere packaging on water holding capacity of chilled meat[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018: 17−31.
[23]	ARANCIBIA M Y, LÓPEZ-CABALLERO M E, GÓMEZ-GUILLÉN M C, et al. Chitosan coatings enriched with active shrimp waste for shrimp preservation[J]. Food Control,2015,54:259−266. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.004
[24]	刁华玉, 林松毅, 梁瑞, 等. 南极磷虾肉冻融循环过程水分的迁移及微观结构变化[J]. 中国食品学报,2022,22(6):242−250. [DIAO Yuhua, LIN Songyi, LIANG Rui, et al. Moisture migration and microstructure changes of antarctic krill meat during multiple freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2022,22(6):242−250.] DIAO Yuhua, LIN Songyi, LIANG Rui, et al. Moisture migration and microstructure changes of antarctic krill meat during multiple freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 22（6）: 242−250.
[25]	孙文彬, 罗欣, 张一敏, 等. 低场核磁共振在肉与肉制品水分测定与分析中的应用研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2019,40(15):346−351. [SUN Wenbin, LUO Xin, ZHANG Yimin, et al. A review of the application of low field nuclear magnetic resonance in detection and analysis of water in meat and meat products[J]. Food Science,2019,40(15):346−351.] doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180903-024 SUN Wenbin, LUO Xin, ZHANG Yimin, et al. A review of the application of low field nuclear magnetic resonance in detection and analysis of water in meat and meat products[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40（15）: 346−351. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180903-024
[26]	HU Z, GÄNZLE M G. Challenges and opportunities related to the use of chitosan as a food preservative[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2019,126(5):1318−1331. doi: 10.1111/jam.14131
[27]	ZHANG Q L, ZHANG J, ZHANG J Q, et al. Antimicrobial effect of tea polyphenols against foodborne pathogens:A review[J]. Journal of Food Protection,2021,84(10):1801−1808. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-043
[28]	TAN Z, SHI Y, XING B, et al. The antimicrobial effects and mechanism of ε-poly-lysine against Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Bioresources and Bioprocessing,2019,6(1):1−10. doi: 10.1186/s40643-018-0235-3
[29]	ZHANG Z, YANG Y, ZHOU P, et al. Effects of high pressure modification on conformation and gelation properties of myofibrillar protein[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,217:678−686. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.040
[30]	WANG B, KONG B, LI F, et al. Changes in the thermal stability and structure of protein from porcine longissimus dorsi induced by different thawing methods[J]. Food Chemistry,2020,316:126375. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126375
[31]	JIN G, LIU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Underlying formation mechanisms of ultrasound-assisted brined porcine meat:The role of physicochemical modification, myofiber fragmentation and histological organization[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2023,94:106318. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106318
[32]	巴吐尔·阿不力克木. 不同贮藏条件下新疆巴什拜羊肉品质变化机制的研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2017:82−89. [BATUR Ablikim. Studies on the mechanism of quality change of xinjiang bashbaby lamb under different storage conditions[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017:82−89.] BATUR Ablikim. Studies on the mechanism of quality change of xinjiang bashbaby lamb under different storage conditions[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017: 82−89.
[33]	LAN W, YANG X, LIU J, et al. Effects of phenolic acid grafted chitosan on moisture state and protein properties of vacuum packaged sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) during refrigerated storage[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2022,159:113208. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113208
[34]	吴倩蓉, 朱宁, 陈松, 等. 加工工艺对酱牛肉中蛋白质降解及风味物质的影响[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(12):76−84. [WU Qianrong, ZHU Ning, CHEN Song, et al. Changes in protein degradation and flavor substance in sauce beef during processing[J]. Food Science,2021,42(12):76−84.] doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200518-206 WU Qianrong, ZHU Ning, CHEN Song, et al. Changes in protein degradation and flavor substance in sauce beef during processing[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42（12）: 76−84. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200518-206
[35]	MOCZKOWSKA M, PÓŁTORAK A, MONTOWSKA M, et al. The effect of the packaging system and storage time on myofibrillar protein degradation and oxidation process in relation to beef tenderness[J]. Meat Science,2017,130:7−15. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.03.008

Supplements (1)

Supplements
Other Related Supplements

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	常旭龙，周青霞，马文聪，詹圳铭，姚欣鑫，周爱梅. 不同发酵剂发酵酸奶的风味及理化特性的研究. 食品工业科技. 2025(08): 263-271 . 本站查看
2.	徐畅，刘天一，刘文佳，张俐敏，莫继先. 微生物胞外多糖的来源、生物合成及功能研究进展. 生物技术进展. 2024(03): 368-376 .