Identification of Adulterated Animal-derived Ingredients in Edible Animal Viscera Based on Capillary Gel Electrophoresis and DNA Barcoding Techniques

LI Jiong; WU Qiong; JIANG Hai; HU Mingjie; JIN Mengna; YAN Jinhua

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022090211

Volume 44 Issue 15

Jul. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2023 > 44(15): 329-336. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022090211

LI Jiong, WU Qiong, JIANG Hai, et al. Identification of Adulterated Animal-derived Ingredients in Edible Animal Viscera Based on Capillary Gel Electrophoresis and DNA Barcoding Techniques[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(15): 329−336. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022090211.

Citation:

PDF (1486 KB)

Identification of Adulterated Animal-derived Ingredients in Edible Animal Viscera Based on Capillary Gel Electrophoresis and DNA Barcoding Techniques

Hangzhou Institute for Food and Drug Control, Hangzhou 310017, China

More Information

Received Date: September 21, 2022
Available Online: June 05, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

A DNA barcoding method with cytochrome C oxidase subunit I sequence (COI) was developed to identify 7 adulterated animal-derived components (including pig, cattle, sheep, chicken, duck, goose and rabbit) in edible viscera products. Samples were cleaned with physiological saline and pretreated by vacuum freeze drying before DNA extraction and amplification. PCR products were confirmed by capillary gel electrophoresis analysis system, and the cloned sequencing results were submitted to the local database (Viscera) for comparison. The universal primer set COI-A was used for the amplification, and the amount of DNA template and annealing temperature were optimized. Meanwhile, the minimum adulteration percentage of 19 edible viscera adulteration models was validated and examined. Results showed that the 5 viscera sources from 7 animal species can be completely amplified under the above conditions, the optimal DNA template volume and annealing temperature are 2 μL and 53 ℃ respectively, and the minimum detection percentage of adulterated components was 5%. The method is sensitive and reliable, which can be used for the identification of adulterated 7 animal-derived components in the edible viscera products.
- capillary gel electrophoresi,
- DNA barcoding,
- viscera,
- cytochrome coxidase subunit I,
- adulteration

FullText(HTML)

References (37)

References

[1]	王学平. 畜禽产品加工的综合利用发展趋势[J]. 肉类研究,2008(11):11−14. [WANG X P. The comprehensive utilization of the livestock and poultry products processing[J]. Meat Research,2008(11):11−14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8123.2008.11.006 WANG X P. The comprehensive utilization of the livestock and poultry products processing[J]. Meat Research, 2008, (11): 11-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8123.2008.11.006
[2]	王晓雄. 吃动物内脏的好与坏[J]. 安全与健康,2017(12):51. [WANG X X. The benefits and disadvantages of eating animal viscera[J]. Safety & Health,2017(12):51. WANG X X. The benefits and disadvantages of eating animal viscera[J]. Safety & Health, 2017, (12): 51.
[3]	张文文, 梅娜娜, 钤莉妍, 等. 驴肝与猪肝、鸡肝和鹅肝之间的营养成分比较[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,9(16):4435−4439. [ZHANG W W, MEI N N, QIAN L Y, et al. Comparison of nutrients between donkey liver and pig liver, chicken liver and goose liver[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality,2018,9(16):4435−4439. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2018.16.041 ZHANG W W, MEI N N, QIAN L Y, et al. Comparison of nutrients between donkey liver and pig liver, chicken liver and goose liver [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2018, 9(16): 4435-4439. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2018.16.041
[4]	李珮斯, 苏永祺, 郭新东, 等. 微波消解-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定动物内脏中金属元素含量[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(21):8915−8917. [LI P S, SU Y Q, GUO X D, et al. Content determination of metal elements in animal viscera by microwave digestion-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(21):8915−8917. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.21.037 LI P S, SU Y Q, GUO X D, et al. Content determination of metal elements in animal viscera by microwave digestion-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(21): 8915-8917. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2013.21.037
[5]	林竹光, 孙若男, 张莉莉, 等. 气相色谱-质谱法同时测定动物内脏中的14种酞酸酯类环境激素残留[J]. 色谱,2008(3):280−284. [LIN Z G, SUN R N, ZHANG L L, et al. Simultaneous determination of 14 phthalate ester residues in animal innards by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with electron impact ionization[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography,2008(3):280−284. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-8713.2008.03.003 LIN Z G, SUN R N, ZHANG L L, et al. Simultaneous determination of 14 phthalate ester residues in animal innards by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with electron impact ionization [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2008, (3): 280-284. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-8713.2008.03.003
[6]	魏法山, 巩阿娜, 谢文佳, 等. 我国畜禽内脏食用安全指标检测分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2017,8(9):3667−3673. [WEI F S, GONG A N, XIE W J, et al. Detection and analysis of edible safety of livestock and poultry viscera in China[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality,2017,8(9):3667−3673. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2017.09.066 WEI F S, GONG A N, XIE W J, et al. Detection and analysis of edible safety of livestock and poultry viscera in China [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2017, 8(9): 3667-3673. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0381.2017.09.066
[7]	ERBAN T, SHCHERBACHENKO E, TALACKO P, et al. A single honey proteome dataset for identifying adulteration by foreign amylases and mining various protein markers natural to honey[J]. Journal of Proteomics,2021,239:104157. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104157
[8]	KRITIKOU A S, AALIZADEH R, DAMALAS D E, et al. MALDI-TOF-MS integrated workflow for food authenticity investigations: An untargeted protein-based approach for rapid detection of PDO feta cheese adulteration[J]. Food Chemistry,2022,370:131057. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131057
[9]	MONTOWSKA M, FORNAL E. Absolute quantification of targeted meat and allergenic protein additive peptide markers in meat products[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,274:857−864. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.131
[10]	LECRENIER M C, MARIEN A, VEYS P, et al. Inter-laboratory study on the detection of bovine processed animal protein in feed by LC-MS/MS-based proteomics[J]. Food Control,2021,125:107944. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107944
[11]	FORNAL E, MONTOWSKA M. Species-specific peptide-based liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry monitoring of three poultry species in processed meat products[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,285:489−498.
[12]	HAO X K, FU L L, SHAO L L, et al. Quantification of major milk proteins using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and its application in milk authenticity analysis[J]. Food Control,2022,131:108455. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108455
[13]	COTTENET G, BLANCPAIN C, CHUAH P F, et al. Evaluation and application of a next generation sequencing approach for meat species identification[J]. Food Control,2020,110:107003. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107003
[14]	GALAL-KHALLAF A. Multiplex PCR and 12S rRNA gene sequencing for detection of meat adulteration: A case study in the Egyptian markets[J]. Gene,2021,764:145062. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.145062
[15]	WANG N, XING R R, ZHOU M Y, et al. Application of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for species identification in salmon products[J]. Food Additives & Contaminants,2021,38(5):754−768.
[16]	CAOBY H, ZHENG K Z, JIANG J F, et al. A novel method to detect meat adulteration by recombinase polymerase amplification and SYBR green I[J]. Food Chemistry,2018,266:73−78. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.115
[17]	KANG T S, TANAKA T. Comparison of quantitative methods based on SYBR Green real-time qPCR to estimate pork meat adulteration in processed beef products[J]. Food Chemistry,2018,269:549−558. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.141
[18]	QUINTO C A, TINOCO R, HELLBERG R S. DNA barcoding reveals mislabeling of game meat species on the U. S. commercial market[J]. Food Control,2016,59:386−392. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.043
[19]	ZIA Q, ALAWAMI M, MOKHTAR N F, et al. Current analytical methods for porcine identification in meat and meat products[J]. Food Chemistry,2020,324:126664. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126664
[20]	XING R R, HU R R, HAN J X, et al. DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in authenticating processed animal-derived food: A case study involving the Chinese market[J]. Food Chemistry,2020,309:125653. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125653
[21]	AHMED N, SANGALE D, TIKNAIK A, et al. Authentication of origin of meat species processed under various Indian culinary procedures using DNA barcoding[J]. Food Control, 2018, 90: 259−265.
[22]	KANE D E, HELLBERG R S. Identification of species in ground meat products sold on the U. S. commercial market using DNA-based methods[J]. Food Control,2016,59:158−163. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.020
[23]	BARAKAT H, EI-GARHY H A S, MOUSTAFA M M A. Detection of pork adulteration in processed meat by species-specific PCR-QIAxcel procedure based on D-loop and cytb genes[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2014,98:9805−9816. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6084-x
[24]	SEN F, UNCU A O, UNCU A T, et al. The trnL (UAA)-trnF (GAA) intergenic spacer is a robust marker of green pea (Pisum sativum L.) adulteration in economically valuable pistachio nuts (Pistacia vera L.)[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2020,100(7):3056−3061. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10336
[25]	ELSAYED M S A E. A first insight into the application of high discriminatory MIRU-VNTR typing using QIAxcel technology for genotyping Mycobacterium bovis isolated from the Delta area in Egypt[J]. Infection, Genetics and Evolution,2019,71:211−214. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.04.004
[26]	HAJIBABAEI M, SINGER G A C, HEBERT P D N, et al. DNA barcoding: How it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics[J]. Trends in Genetics,2007,23(4):167−172. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001
[27]	IVANOVA N V, DEWAARD J R, HEBERT P D N. An inexpensive automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA[J]. Molecular Ecology Notes,2006,6:998−1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x
[28]	RAO M S, CHAKRABORTY G, MURTHY K S. Market drivers and discovering technologies in meat species identification[J]. Food Analytical Methods,2019,12:2416−2429. doi: 10.1007/s12161-019-01591-8
[29]	KUMAR A, RODRIGUES V, BASKARAN K, et al. DNA barcode based species-specific marker for Ocimum tenuiflorum and its applicability in quantification of adulteration in herbal formulations using qPCR[J]. Journal of Herbal Medicine,2020,23:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100376
[30]	DAI Z Y, QIAO J, YANG S R, et al. Species authentication of common meat based on PCR analysis of the mitochondrial COI Gene[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology,2015,176:1770−1780. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1715-y
[31]	LIU W W, TAO J, XUE M, et al. A multiplex PCR method mediated by universal primers for the identification of eight meat ingredients in food products[J]. European Food Research and Technology,2019,245:2385−2392. doi: 10.1007/s00217-019-03350-9
[32]	DUNHAM-CHEATHAM S M, KLINGLER K B, ESTRADA M V, et al. Using a next-generation sequencing approach to DNA metabarcoding for identification of adulteration and potential sources of mercury in commercial cat and dog foods[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2021,778:146102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146102
[33]	COTTENET G, SONNARD V, BLANCPAIN C, et al. A DNA macro-array to simultaneously identify 32 meat species in food samples[J]. Food Control,2016,67:135−143. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.042
[34]	SWETHA V P, SHEEJA T E, SASIKUMAR B. DNA barcoding as an authentication tool for food and agricultural commodities[J]. Current Trends in Biotechnology & Pharmacy,2016,10(4):384−402.
[35]	HELLBERG R S, HERNANDEZ B C, HERNANDEZ E L. Identification of meat and poultry species in food products using DNA barcoding[J]. Food Controll,2017,80:23−28. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.025
[36]	励炯, 吴琼, 扈明洁, 等. 基于细胞色素C氧化酶亚基Ⅰ序列的DNA微条形码技术鉴别11种生鲜肉制品掺假的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2021,47(1):52−59. [LI J, WU Q, HU M J, et al. Identification of adulteration in 11 fresh meat products by DNA mini-barcoding methods based on cytochrome C oxidase subunit Ⅰ (COⅠ) sequence[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences),2021,47(1):52−59. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.04.291 LI J, WU Q, HU M J, et al. Identification of adulteration in 11 fresh meat products by DNA mini-barcoding methods based on cytochrome C oxidase subunit Ⅰ (COⅠ) sequence[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(1): 52-59. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.04.291
[37]	郜星晨, 姜伟. 三峡库区常见鱼类DNA条形码本地BLAST数据库的构建和应用[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学,2021,40(5):1952−1964. [HAO X C, JIANG W. The construction and application of BLAST database of DNA barcode for common fish in the three gorges reservoir[J]. Genomics and Applied Biology,2021,40(5):1952−1964. doi: 10.13417/j.gab.040.001952 HAO X C, JIANG W. The construction and application of BLAST database of DNA barcode for common fish in the three gorges reservoir [J]. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2021, 40(5): 1952-1964. doi: 10.13417/j.gab.040.001952

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	赵孟斌，顾华蓉，穆洪涛，高向阳. 基于感官评价和分子对接的Pro、Glu二肽与鲜味受体构效关系. 现代食品科技. 2023(09): 123-136 .
2.	赵孟斌，张琦梦，宋明月，刘果，曹庸，高向阳. 味觉感知的人体肠-脑轴信号传导机制研究进展. 食品科学. 2022(11): 197-203 .