Optimization of Processing Conditions and Prediction of Shelf Life of Probiotic-rich Miscellaneous Bean Powder

TAO Li; HUANG Wanru; YU Lei; WEI Yihua; ZHANG Xin

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021020142

Volume 42 Issue 19

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(19): 238-246. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021020142

TAO Li, HUANG Wanru, YU Lei, et al. Optimization of Processing Conditions and Prediction of Shelf Life of Probiotic-rich Miscellaneous Bean Powder[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(19): 238−246. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021020142.

Citation:

PDF (2948 KB)

Optimization of Processing Conditions and Prediction of Shelf Life of Probiotic-rich Miscellaneous Bean Powder

TAO Li^1,,
HUANG Wanru¹,
YU Lei^{1, 2, ,},
WEI Yihua¹,
ZHANG Xin¹

1.
School of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2.
National Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Corn Deep Processing, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China

More Information

Received Date: February 21, 2021
Available Online: August 02, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Mung beans as raw materials were used to prepare probiotic-rich mung bean powder, the preparation process conditions were optimized. The applicability of the preparation process conditions to different miscellaneous beans were verified, and the shelf life of different miscellaneous bean powders were explored. The Plackett-Burman design was used to select soaking temperature, homogenization pressure, and inlet temperature as three of the eight significant factors that affect the fermentation in mung bean powder. The best process parameters were as follows: soaking temperature 50 ℃, homogenizing pressure 200 Bar and inlet temperature 115 ℃ as determined by the Box-Behnken design. Under these conditions, the experimental value of Lactobacillus fermentum in mung bean powder was 2.39×10⁸ CFU/g, which was not significantly different from the predicted value of 2.46×10⁸ CFU/g. In addition, by examining the effects of this optimized condition on red beans, chickpeas, cowpeas, peas and tiger skin kidney beans, it was found that the bacterial activity in the bean powder could exceed 10⁷ CFU/g. This was met the requirements of probiotic foods. Among them, tiger skin kidney bean powder was the highest, reaching 3.27×10⁸ CFU/g, indicating that these conditions had universal applicability for miscellaneous beans. The Arrhenius model predicted that the storage temperature of the bean powder products for one year should be less than 10 ℃. In addition, the moisture content in the miscellaneous bean powder were low, which were conducive to storage.
- mung bean,
- miscellaneous bean powder,
- probiotic,
- spray drying,
- optimization,
- Arrhenius model,
- shelf life

FullText(HTML)

References (38)

References

[1]	Jakubczyk A. Effect of addition of fermented bean seed flour on the content of bioactive components and nutraceutical potential of wheat wafers[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2018,98:245−251. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.052
[2]	Wang H, Gui M, Tian X, et al. Effects of UV-B on vitamin C, phenolics, flavonoids and their related enzyme activities in mung bean sprouts (Vigna radiata)[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2017,52(3):827−833.
[3]	么杨. 绿豆降血糖活性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008. Mo Y. Study on hypoglycemic activity of mung bean[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2008.
[4]	王立, 任思, 周素梅, 等. 绿豆发酵制品及其功能活性研究[J]. 食品与机械,2019,35(2):231−236. [Wang L, Ren S, Zhou S, et al. Research on fermented mung bean products and their functional activity[J]. Food & Machinery,2019,35(2):231−236.
[5]	Keong Y S, Kee B B, Mohd A N, et al. In vivo antistress and antioxidant effects of fermented and germinated mung bean[J]. Biomed Research International,2014,2014:694842.
[6]	Zhang X, Shang P, Qin F, et al. Chemical composition and antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of ten commercial mung bean samples[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2013,54(1):171−178. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.05.034
[7]	Li M, Zhang Y, Xia S, et al. Finding and isolation of novel peptides with anti-proliferation ability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells from mung bean protein hydrolysates[J]. Journal of Functional Foods,2019,62(C):103557.
[8]	宋倩倩. 绿豆多糖理化性质、抗氧化活性及其对小鼠肠道健康的影响[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2020. Song Q. The physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity of mung bean polysaccharide and its effect on mouse gut health[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2020.
[9]	Yao Y, Zhu Y, Ren G. Immunoregulatory activities of polysaccharides from mung bean[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2016,139:61−66. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.001
[10]	Pradhan D, Singh R, Tyagi A, et al. Assessing safety of Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 5690 and Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC 5689 using in vitro approaches and an in vivo murine model[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2019,101:1−11. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.10.011
[11]	吕懿超, 李香澳, 王凯博, 等. 乳酸菌作为生物保护菌的抑菌机理及其在食品中应用的研究进展[J]. 食品科学: 1−14. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200620-279. Lu Y, Li X, Wang K, et al. The antibacterial mechanism of lactic acid bacteria as biological protection bacteria and the research progress of its application in food[J]. Food Science: 1−14. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200620-279.
[12]	刘飞翔, 董其惠, 吴蓉, 等. 不同国家和地区传统发酵食品及其发酵微生物研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(21):338−350. [Liu F, Dong Q, Wu R, et al. Research progress of traditional fermented foods and fermented microorganisms in different countries and regions[J]. Food Science,2020,41(21):338−350. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20191121-254
[13]	王储炎, 张继刚, 杨柳青, 等. 3种乳酸菌发酵对蓝莓多酚、原花青素含量及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(24):87−94. [Wang C, Zhang J, Yang L, et al. Effects of fermentation of three lactic acid bacteria on the content of blueberry polyphenols, proanthocyanidins and antioxidant activity[J]. Food Science,2020,41(24):87−94. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200326-387
[14]	白晓晔, 孙志宏, 张和平. 益生乳酸菌与肠道菌群稳态[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2020,39(9):6−15. [Bai X, Sun Z, Zhang H. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria and intestinal flora homeostasis[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology,2020,39(9):6−15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1689.2020.09.002
[15]	Wu H, Rui X, Li W, et al. Mung bean (Vigna radiata) as probiotic food through fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum B1-6[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2015,63(1):445−451. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.011
[16]	Jhan J, Chang W, Wang P, et al. Production of fermented red beans with multiple bioactivities using co-cultures of Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2015,63(2):1281−1287. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.107
[17]	Anekella K, Orsat V. Shelf life stability of lactobacilli encapsulated in raspberry powder: Insights into non-dairy probiotics[J]. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,2014,65(4):411−418. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2013.869793
[18]	Tripathi M K, Giri S K. Probiotic functional foods: Survival of probiotics during processing and storage[J]. Journal of Functional Foods,2014,9:225−241. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030
[19]	Nelson K A, Labuza T P. Water activity and food polymer science: Implications of state on Arrhenius and WLF models in predicting shelf life[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,1994,22:271−289. doi: 10.1016/0260-8774(94)90035-3
[20]	Fu N, Chen X. Towards a maximal cell survival in convective thermal drying processes[J]. Food Research International,2011,44(5):1127−1149. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.053
[21]	Aschenbrenner M, Kulozik U, Foerst P. Evaluation of the relevance of the glassy state as stability criterion for freeze-dried bacteria by application of the Arrhenius and WLF model[J]. Cryobiology,2012,65(3):308−318. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.08.005
[22]	Vivek K, Mishra S, Pradhan R C. Characterization of spray dried probiotic Sohiong fruit powder with Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2020,117:108669. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108669
[23]	Guo N, Song X, Kou P, et al. Optimization of fermentation parameters with magnetically immobilized Bacillus natto on Ginkgo seeds and evaluation of bioactivity and safety[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2018,97:172−179. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.046
[24]	King V A, Lin H, Liu C. Accelerated storage testing of freeze-dried and controlled low-temperature vacuum dehydrated Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology,1998,44(2):161−165. doi: 10.2323/jgam.44.161
[25]	Fournaise T, Burgain J, Perroud C, et al. Impact of formulation on reconstitution and flowability of spray-dried milk powders[J]. Powder Technology,2020,372:107−116. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.085
[26]	王喜波, 梁亚茹, 杨朔, 等. 改性大豆磷脂对豆粉结构和理化性质的影响[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(4):52−58. [Wang X, Liang Y, Yang S, et al. Effects of modified soybean phospholipids on the structure and physical and chemical properties of soybean flour[J]. Food Science,2020,41(4):52−58. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20181228-333
[27]	Bengardino M B, Fernandez M V, Nutter J, et al. Recovery of bioactive compounds from beet leaves through simultaneous extraction: Modelling and process optimization[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing,2019,118:227−236. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2019.09.013
[28]	ZaferE, NurcanK, FigenK, et al. Optimization of spray drying process in cheese powder production[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing,2015,93:156−165. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2013.12.008
[29]	Coffigniez F, Briffaz A, Mestres C, et al. Impact of soaking process on the microstructure of cowpea seeds in relation to solid losses and water absorption[J]. Food Research International,2019,119:268−275. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.010
[30]	Thammapat P, Meeso N, Siriamornpun S. Effects of NaCl and soaking temperature on the phenolic compounds, alpha-tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol and fatty acids of glutinous rice[J]. Food Chemistry,2015,175:218−224. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.146
[31]	姜甜, 陆文伟, 崔树茂, 等. 静电喷雾干燥微囊化乳双歧杆菌BL03[J]. 食品与发酵工业: 1−10. DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025732. Jiang T, Lu W, Cui S, et al. Electrostatic spray drying of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium lactis BL03[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries: 1−10. DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025732.
[32]	Khaneghah A M, Abhari K, Eş I, et al. Interactions between probiotics and pathogenic microorganisms in hosts and foods: A review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology,2020,95:205−218.
[33]	Huang L. Reconciliation of the D/z model and the Arrhenius model: The effect of temperature on inactivation rates of chemical compounds and microorganisms[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,295:499−504. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.150
[34]	Meng X C, Stanton C, Fitzgerald G F, et al. Anhydrobiotics: The challenges of drying probiotic cultures[J]. Food Chemistry,2008,106(4):1406−1416. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.076
[35]	Huang S, Vignolles M, Chen X, et al. Spray drying of probiotics and other food-grade bacteria: A review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology,2017,63:1−17.
[36]	Saha D, Nanda S K, Yadav D N. Optimization of spray drying process parameters for production of groundnut milk powder[J]. Powder Technology,2019,355:417−424. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.07.066
[37]	Padalino L, Mastromatteo M, Lecce L, et al. Optimization and characterization of gluten-free spaghetti enriched with chickpea flour[J]. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,2015,66(2):148−158. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2014.959897
[38]	Goula A M, Adamopoulos K G. Spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. The effect on powder properties[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2005,66(1):35−42. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.031