Quality Determination and Correlation Analysis of Mulberry Fruits during Different Development Stages

QIAO Jian; LI Guopeng; DU Liqing; WEI Changbin; LI Tianzi; MA Zhiling

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110206

Volume 42 Issue 17

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(17): 24-29. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110206

QIAO Jian, LI Guopeng, DU Liqing, et al. Quality Determination and Correlation Analysis of Mulberry Fruits during Different Development Stages[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(17): 24−29. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110206.

Citation:

PDF (886 KB)

Quality Determination and Correlation Analysis of Mulberry Fruits during Different Development Stages

1.
Institute of South Subtropical Corp Research, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang 524091, China
2.
Coastal Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China

More Information

Received Date: November 22, 2020
Available Online: June 30, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In the present study, the single fruit weight, soluble solids, titratable acid content, sugar and organic acid composition and content of seven mulberry varieties were identified and determined at three development stages. The results showed that the contents of soluble solids and suger increased during the development of mullberry fruit, while the organic acid decreased. Eight kinds of organic acids, including citric acid, malic acid, quinic acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, ketoglutarate, ascorbic acid and oxalic acid, were detected and determined. Citric acid was the most abudant organic acid, followed by quinic acid and malic acid. The relative content of citric acid ranged from 44.84% to 80.86%. Fructose and glucose were most important suger content. The content of Fructose and glucose reached to 57.79 mg/g and 66.72 mg/g respectively in Taiwan Changguosang at last development stage. And sucrose was only detected in Taiwan Changguosang.Through correlation analysis, titratable acid was negatively correlated with soluble solids, fructose, glucose and fruit weight, and highly positive correlation was found among soluble solids, fructose, glucose and glucose content.
- mulberry,
- developing stages,
- quality,
- sugar composition,
- organic acids,
- correlation analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	赵忠平, 周全珍, 潘志法, 等. 果桑资源产业化研究现状与设想[J]. 江苏蚕业,2012,34(3):44−48. [Zhao Z P, Zhou Q Z, Pan Z F, et al. Research status and ideas on fruit industrialization of mulberry resources[J]. Jiangsu Sericulture,2012,34(3):44−48.
[2]	王鸿飞, 李和生, 韩素珍, 等. 桑葚的加工利用[J]. 宁波大学学报,1999,12(4):81−84. [Wang H F, Li H S, Han S Z, et al. Processing and utilization of mulberry[J]. Journal of Ningbo University,1999,12(4):81−84.
[3]	乔廷廷, 郭玲. 花青素来源、结构特性和生理功能的研究进展[J]. 中成药,2019,41(2):388−392. [Qiao T T, Guo L. Research progress on source, structure and physiological function of anthocyanins[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine,2019,41(2):388−392. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2019.02.029
[4]	刘兆平, 霍军生. 白藜芦醇的生物学作用[J]. 环境卫生学杂志,2002(3):146−148. [Liu Z P, Huo J S. Biological effects of resveratrol[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene,2002(3):146−148.
[5]	Dong Y H, Chen C, Huang Q, et al. Study on a novel spherical polysaccharide from Fructus Mori with good antioxidant activity[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2021,256:117516. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117516
[6]	Li H, Yang Z, Zeng Q, et al. Abnormal expression of bHLH3 disrupts a flavonoid homeostasis network, causing differences in pigment composition among mulberry fruits[J]. Horticulture Research,2020,7(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0302-8
[7]	刘学铭. 发展桑葚产业的思考[J]. 广东蚕业,2000(4):10−14. [Liu X M. Thoughts on the development of mulberry industry[J]. Guangdong Sericulture,2000(4):10−14.
[8]	陈智慧, 邹宇晓, 刘凡, 等. 基于微生物转化技术的桑葚食品加工研究进展[J]. 蚕业科学,2016,42(2):336−340. [Chen Zhihui, Zou Yuxiao, Liu Fan, et al. Advancement in mulberry fruit food processing based on microbial transformation technology[J]. Science of Sericulture,2016,42(2):336−340.
[9]	刘利, 潘一乐. 果桑资源研究利用现状与展望[J]. 植物遗传资源科学,2001,2(2):61−65. [Liu L, Pan Y L. Current status and prospects on research and utilization of fruit mulberry germplasm resource[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources,2001,2(2):61−65.
[10]	赵珮, 黄传书, 刘艳, 等. 重庆市不同地区桑椹品质的比较分析[J]. 蚕学通讯,2018,38(3):19−24. [Zhao P, Huang C S, Liu Y, et al. Quality comparison of different mulberry varieties in chongqing[J]. Newsletter of Sericultural Science,2018,38(3):19−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0561.2018.03.003
[11]	Wu J, Gao H, Zhao L, et al. Chemical compositional characterization of some apple cultivars[J]. Food Chemistry,2007,103(1):88−93. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.030
[12]	Hampson C R, Quamme H A, Hall J W, et al. Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding[J]. Euphytica,2000,111(2):79−90. doi: 10.1023/A:1003769304778
[13]	贾定贤, 米文广, 杨儒琳, 等. 苹果品种果实糖, 酸含量的分级标准与风味的关系[J]. 园艺学报,1991,18(1):9−14. [Jia D X, Mi G W, Yang R L, et al. Sugar and acid content of fruit and its classifcaiton standard associated with flavor in different apple cultivars[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,1991,18(1):9−14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.1991.01.008
[14]	张欣, 贝盏临, 张安东. 香水梨采后果实中可溶性糖及其代谢酶变化的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学,2015,54(24):6351−6355. [Zhang X, Bei Z L, Zhang A D. Study on the changes of soluble sugar and its metabolic enzymes in pgrus ussuriensismaxim fruit[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science,2015,54(24):6351−6355.
[15]	孙新菊, 齐开杰, 张绍铃. “鸭梨”“新高梨”果实发育中果肉及种子有机酸含量的变化[J]. 中国南方果树,2018,47(6):115−120. [Sun X J, Qi K J, Zhang S L. Changes of organic acid content in pulp and seed during ‘Yali’ and ‘Xingaoli’ fruit development[J]. South China Fruit,2018,47(6):115−120.
[16]	蔡小林, 潘介春, 周煜棉, 等. 荔枝糖酸代谢特性及其调控研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2018,46(4):17−22. [Cai X L, Pan J C, Zhou Y M, et al. Research progress on characteristics and regulation of sugar and acid metabolism in Litchi[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(4):17−22.
[17]	陈洁珍, 蔡长河, 吴洁芳, 等. 荔枝资源果实成熟进程中糖、酸变化[J]. 热带作物学报,2018,39(4):687−693. [Chen J Z, Cai C H, Wu J F, et al. Changes of sugars and acid in the aril of litchi germplasm during fruit maturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2018,39(4):687−693. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2018.04.012
[18]	李升锋, 张友胜, 池建伟, 等. 不同品种桑葚糖酸组分分析[J]. 农产品加工: 学刊,2011(7):108−111. [Li S F, Zhang Y S, Chi J W, et al. Analysis of sugar and organic acids compositions of different mulberry cultivars[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing,2011(7):108−111.
[19]	聂继云. 果品质量安全分析技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2009. Nie J Y. Fruit quality and safety analysis technology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009.
[20]	姚改芳, 杨志军, 张绍铃, 等. 梨不同栽培种果实有机酸组分及含量特征分析[J]. 园艺学报,2014,41(4):755−764. [Yao G F, Yang Z J, Zhang S L, et al. Characteristics of components and contents of organic acid in pear fruits from different cultivated species[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2014,41(4):755−764.
[21]	周远明, 徐坤, 王倩文. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜中葡萄糖、果糖、蔗糖及山梨醇含量[J]. 化学与生物工程,2019,36(3):66−68. [Zhou Y M, Xu K, Wang Q W. Determination of contents of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol in vegetables by UPLC-MS/MS[J]. Chemistry and Bioengineering,2019,36(3):66−68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5425.2019.03.014
[22]	贺雅娟, 马宗桓, 韦霞霞, 等. 黄土高原旱塬区不同品种苹果果实糖及有机酸含量比较分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 11: 1−16. He Y J, Ma Z H, Wei X X, et al. Comparative analysis of sugar and organic acid contents of different apple cultivars in dryland of loess plateau[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 11: 1−16.
[23]	王海波, 李林光, 陈学森, 等. 中早熟苹果品种果实的风味物质和风味品质[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(11):2300−2307. [Wang H B, Li L G, Chen X S, et al. Flavor compounds and flavor quality of fruits of mid-season apple cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2010,43(11):2300−2307. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.11.013
[24]	姚改芳, 张绍铃, 曹玉芬, 等. 不同栽培种梨果实中可溶性糖组分及含量特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(20):4229−4237. [Yao G F, Zhang S L, Cao Y F, et al. Characteristics of components and contents of soluble sugars in pear fruits from different species[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2010,43(20):4229−4237. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.20.014
[25]	Zhang Y, Li R, Cheng R. Developmental changes of carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids, and phenolic compounds in 'Honeycrisp' apple flesh[J]. Food Chemistry,2010,123(4):1013−1018. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.053
[26]	Cantín C M, Gogorcena Y, Moreno M Á. Analysis of phenotypic variation of sugar profile in different peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) breeding progenies[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2009,89(11):1909−1917. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3672
[27]	李泰山, 杜改改, 刁松锋, 等. 负载量调控对杏李‘味帝’果实糖酸组分及风味的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2017,22(5):39−48. [Li T S, Du G G, Diao S F, et al. Crop load influence the componets of sugar, acid and flavor in Prunus domestic×armenica ‘Weidi’[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2017,22(5):39−48. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2017.05.005
[28]	江雨, 孟江飞, 刘崇怀, 等. 中国野生葡萄果实基本品质、酚类物质含量及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(7):142−148. [Jiang Y, Meng J F, Liu C H, et al. Quality characteristics, phenolics content and antioxidant activity of Chinese wild grapes[J]. Food Science,2017,38(7):142−148. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201707023
[29]	Liu H F, Wu B H, Fan P G, et al. Sugar and acid concentrations in 98 grape cultivars analyzed by principal component analysis[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2006,86(10):1526−1536. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2541
[30]	乔宇, 吕辉华, 吴继军, 等. 不同品种桑椹中糖酸组成和甜酸风味评价[J]. 食品科学技术学报,2016,34(4):44−49. [Qiao Y, Lv H H, Wu J J, et al. Analysis of organic acids and sugar compositions and flavor evaluation of different mulberry cultivars[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2016,34(4):44−49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6002.2016.04.008

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	周法婷，李迪，李开凤，蒋忠桂，魏蝶，丛之慧，陈井生，顾欣，肖国生. 基于网络药理学及分子对接探讨猪胶原血管紧张素转换酶抑制肽的降压机制. 食品与发酵工业. 2024(18): 217-224 .
2.	江文婷，陈旭，蔡茜茜，杨傅佳，黄丹，黄建联，汪少芸. 基于分子对接技术研究鱼源抗冻多肽与鱼肌球蛋白的相互作用. 食品工业科技. 2022(20): 29-38 . 本站查看
3.	陈姣，肖静，陈林，刘隆臻. 基于新型冠状病毒3CL~(pro)结构的小肽抑制剂虚拟筛选. 江苏海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(03): 69-75 .