Extraction, Purification of Taro Globulin and Its Inhibitory Activity on <i>α</i>-Amylase and <i>α</i>-Glucosidase

MA Erlan; LIN Ying; TU Lian; ZHANG Fan; WANG Weiliang

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100266

Volume 42 Issue 14

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(14): 25-32. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100266

MA Erlan, LIN Ying, TU Lian, et al. Extraction, Purification of Taro Globulin and Its Inhibitory Activity on α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(14): 25−32. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100266.

Citation:

PDF (1769 KB)

Extraction, Purification of Taro Globulin and Its Inhibitory Activity on α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase

College of Light Industry and Food Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

More Information

Received Date: November 02, 2020
Available Online: May 25, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: Exploring taro globulin regulating activity in vitro. Methods: Taro globulin was extracted by phosphate buffer. The effects of solid-liquid ratio, temperature, time and times on protein extraction were investigated with protein extraction rate as an index. Based on the test, response surface methodology was used to optimize the extraction process. The crude protein was purified by DEAE-52 ion cellulose column chromatography. The purity of purified globulin was detected by high performance liquid chromatography, and its isoelectric point and molecular weight were determined. The inhibitory activity and inhibition kinetics of taro globulin on α -amylase and α-glucosidase were studied, and acarbose was used as positive control to evaluate globulin activity of regulating blood glucose in vitro. Results: The optimum extraction conditions were as follows: The solid-to-liquid ratio was 1:16 g/mL, the temperature was 41 ℃, and the time was 124 min. Under these condition, the extraction rate was 36.75%±0.31%, the yield was 0.70%±0.04%, and the purity of the protein was 85.72%±0.47%. The purified globulin was detected by high performance liquid chromatography with a main peak with purity of 93.27%, yield of 0.20%±0.01%, isoelectric point of 5.6 and molecular weight of about 22 kDa. The taro globulin exhibited inhibition on the two enzymes with dose-effect relationship. The IC₅₀ was (0.75±0.10) mg/mL for α-amylase and was (2.09±0.19) mg/mL for α-glucosidase The IC₅₀ of acarbose were (0.61±0.13) mg/mL and (0.69±0.16) mg/mL. The results showed that the inhibitory activity of taro globulin on α-amylase was slightly lower than acarbose, while the inhibitory activity on α-glucosidase was much lower than acarbose. The inhibition type was reversible and uncompetitive inhibitor, with K_i=(0.61±0.05) mg/ml for α-amylase and K_i=(0.26±0.02) mmol/L/L for α-glucosidase. Conclusion: The extraction process of taro globulin was optimized, and taro globulin was purified. It was found that taro globulin has certain activity of regulating blood sugar in vitro, which would have certain guiding significance for the research and development of functional food and the increasing of added value of taro products.
- taro,
- globulin,
- extraction,
- purification,
- glucose regulating activity

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	童晶晶, 赖富饶, 吴晖, 等. 加工因素对张溪香芋全粉品质影响[J]. 粮食与油脂,2014,27(8):20−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9578.2014.08.006
[2]	Pereira P R, Silva J T, Verícimo M A, et al. Crude extract from taro (Colocasia esculenta) as a natural source of bioactive proteins able to stimulate haematopoietic cells in two murine models[J]. Journal of Functional Foods,2015,18:333−343. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.07.014
[3]	Wu C, Lin K. The Antioxidative Characteristics of taro and sweet potato protein hydrolysates and their inhibitory capability on angiotensin converting enzyme[J]. Food Science and Technology Research,2017,23(6):845−853. doi: 10.3136/fstr.23.845
[4]	Pereira P R, Corrêa A C N T, Vericimo M A, et al. Tarin, a potential immunomodulator and cox-inhibitor lectin found in taro (Colocasia esculenta)[J]. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2018,17(4):878−891. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12358
[5]	Yu J, Liu P, Duan J, et al. Itches-stimulating compounds from Colocasia esculenta (taro): Bioactive-guided screening and LC-MS/MS identification[J]. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters,2015,25(20):4382−4386.
[6]	Ribeiro P P, Mere D A E, Afonso V M, et al. Purification and characterization of the lectin from taro (Colocasia esculenta) and its effect on mouse splenocyte proliferation in vitro and in vivo[J]. The Protein Journal, 2014, 33(1): 92-99.
[7]	童晶晶, 张晓元, 赖富饶, 等. 不同溶剂对香芋蛋白提取及活性的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2016,32(1):194−202.
[8]	黄友如, 王教飞, 李昕蓓, 等. 芋艿分离蛋白的制备及工艺条件优化[J]. 常熟理工学院学报,2017,31(2):97−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2794.2017.02.021
[9]	罗丽平, 李冰晶, 赵景芳, 等. 三种食用菌提取物体外抗氧化与降血糖活性研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(20):324−329.
[10]	李波, 包怡红, 高锋, 等. 红松松球鳞片多酚对α-淀粉酶和α-葡萄糖苷酶的抑制作用[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(1):63−65.
[11]	Kumari B, Sharma P, Nath A K. α-Amylase inhibitor in local Himalyan collections of Colocasia: Isolation, purification, characterization and selectivity towards α-amylases from various sources[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2012,103(1):49−55. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.03.003
[12]	Tiengburanatam N, Boonmee A, Sangvanich P, et al. A novel alpha-glucosidase inhibitor protein from the rhizomes of Zingiber ottensii Valeton[J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol,2010,162(7):1938−1951. doi: 10.1007/s12010-010-8971-7
[13]	Mcewan R , Madivha R P , Djarova T , et al. Alpha-amylase inhibitor of amadumbe (Colocasia esculenta): Isolation, purification and selectivity toward alpha-amylases from various sources[J]. African Journal of Biochemistry Research,2010,4(9):220−224.
[14]	Sharma K K, Pattabiraman T N. Natural plant enzyme inhibitors. Isolation and characterisation of two α-amylase inhibitors from Colocasia antiquorum tubers[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1980,31(10):981−991. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740311003
[15]	童晶晶. 香芋蛋白的提取及其胰蛋白酶抑制剂的研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2016.
[16]	杨静华. 考马斯亮蓝法测定苦荞麦中可溶性蛋白的含量[J]. 山西医药杂志,2018,47(2):206−207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2018.02.035
[17]	石玮婷, 李荣, 姜子涛. 紫苏籽蛋白的提取及纯化研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2013(4):68−74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2513.2013.04.003
[18]	黄文. 白果活性蛋白的分离、纯化、结构及其生物活性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2002.
[19]	阙淼琳, 蒋玉蓉, 曹美丽, 等. 响应面试验优化藜麦种子多酚提取工艺及其品种差异[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(4):7−12. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201604002
[20]	周晓薇, 王静, 段浩, 等. 铁棍山药蛋白质的分离纯化及体外抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学,2011,32(9):31−35.
[21]	李雨哲. 马氏珍珠贝糖蛋白提取纯化及其抗氧化活性的研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2011.
[22]	崔竹梅, 王红玲, 张占琴, 等. 鹰嘴豆籽粒清蛋白和球蛋白等电点、相对分子量的测定[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2007(6):89−95.
[23]	周仲驹等夏其昌张祥明. 蛋白质电泳技术指南[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007: 23−30.
[24]	刘睿, 潘思轶, 刘亮, 等. 高粱原花青素对α-淀粉酶活力抑制动力学的研究[J]. 食品科学,2005(9):171−174.
[25]	秦樱瑞, 黄先智, 曾艺涛, 等. 干燥方法对苦瓜降糖成分含量的影响[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(15):56−61. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201515012
[26]	Wu Y, Zhou Q, Chen X, et al. Comparison and screening of bioactive phenolic compounds in different blueberry cultivars: Evaluation of anti-oxidation and α-glucosidase inhibition effect[J]. Food Research International,2017,100:312−324. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.004
[27]	张永军, 黄惠华. 茶多酚对胰α-淀粉酶的抑制动力学研究[J]. 食品工业,2010,31(1):7−9.
[28]	马庆一, 陈丽华, 杨海延, 等. 山茱萸中α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制活性因子的筛选(Ⅰ)[J]. 食品科学,2007(1):167−170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2007.01.039
[29]	常银子, 王丽霞, 仲山民, 等. 酶法提取芋艿蛋白质工艺[J]. 食品研究与开发,2011,32(3):19−22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2011.03.006
[30]	Damares C. Monte-Neshich T L R R. Characterization and spatial localization of the major globulin families of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) tubers[J]. Plant Science, 1995, 112: 149-159.
[31]	伍城颖, 吴启南, 王红, 等. 芡种皮多酚提取物体外抑制α-葡萄糖苷酶和α-淀粉酶活性研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(16):91−94.