Quality Analysis of 10 Dried Line Pepper Varieties

GAO Jia; TIAN Yuxiao; LUO Fangyao; LUO Jinghong; TANG Yueming; SONG Zhanfeng

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100143

Volume 42 Issue 14

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(14): 284-288. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100143

GAO Jia, TIAN Yuxiao, LUO Fangyao, et al. Quality Analysis of 10 Dried Line Pepper Varieties [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(14): 284−288. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020100143.

Citation:

PDF (686 KB)

Quality Analysis of 10 Dried Line Pepper Varieties

1.
Institute of Agro-products Processing Science and Technology, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
2.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Southwest Region), Chengdu 610066, China
3.
Institute of Horticulture, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China

More Information

Received Date: October 19, 2020
Available Online: May 17, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to select new pepper varieties of high-quality for drying process, the main quality indexes of 10 new varieties of line pepper were analyzed, such as soluble sugar, capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin and carotenoid. Through statistical analysis, correlation analysis and membership function analysis, the best comprehensive quality variety was selected as Hongguan No. 4. The samples were divided into three types by cluster analysis, including 2 varieties with high spicy and high carotenoid content, 3 varieties with low spicy and high carotenoid content, and 5 varieties with medium spicy. The results showed that the membership function analysis and cluster analysis were consistent in the order and classification of varieties. This experiment could provide a theoretical basis for the selection of pepper processing varieties.
- line pepper,
- dry processing,
- quality,
- suitability

FullText(HTML)

References (24)

References

[1]	邹学校, 马艳青, 戴雄泽, 等. 辣椒在中国的传播与产业发展[J]. 园艺学报. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0103.
[2]	马艳青. 我国辣椒产业形势分析[J]. 辣椒杂志(季刊),2011(1):1−5.
[3]	盛祥参. 我国辣椒种质资源的分类[J]. 北方园艺,2011(18):196−198.
[4]	黄任中, 黄启中, 吕中华, 等. 我国干制辣椒产业现状及发展对策[J]. 中国蔬菜,2015(2):9−11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2015.02.004
[5]	张正海, 曹亚从, 于海龙, 等. 辣椒果实主要品质性状遗传和代谢物组成研究进展[J]. 园艺学报,2019,46(9):1825−1841.
[6]	聂乾忠, 夏延斌, 曾晓楠, 等. 辣椒素的代谢途径及生理功能的研究进展[J]. 食品与机械,2008,24(2):141−145.
[7]	霍建泰, 李晓峰, 罗爱玉, 等. 干制专用辣椒新品种‘航椒7号’[J]. 园艺学报,2012,39(4):807−808.
[8]	Scala K D, Crapiste G. Drying kinetics and quality changes during drying of red pepper[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2008,41:789−795. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.06.007
[9]	须海丽. 辣椒品质育种研究进展[J]. 长江蔬菜,2004(2):34−37. doi: 10.3865/j.issn.1001-3547.2004.02.027
[10]	Ayuso M C, Bernalte M J, Lozano M, et al. Quality characteristics of different pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.) for hot paprika production[J]. European Food Research and Technology,2008,227:557−563. doi: 10.1007/s00217-007-0756-z
[11]	吉雪花, 陈于平. 几种制干辣椒品种主要营养成分的分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2008,36(33):14491−14492. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.33.054
[12]	周书栋, 杨博智, 欧阳娴, 等. 不同干椒品种中辣椒素总含量的比较[J]. 辣椒杂志(季刊),2011(4):23−25.
[13]	周书栋, 杨博智, 赵激, 等. 干椒中红色素色价、辣椒素含量与果实主要性状的相关性研究[J]. 湖南农业科学,2013(15):34−36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.15.011
[14]	腾有德. 四川辣椒产业现状与发展趋势及对策思考[J]. 辣椒杂志,2008(3):1−5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4542.2008.03.001
[15]	曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007, 57-59.
[16]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 21266-2007 辣椒及辣椒制品中辣椒素类物质及辣度表示方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[17]	井凤, 刘峰, 傅茂润, 等. 杭椒干制过程中类胡萝卜素含量的变化[J]. 食品科学,2013,34(11):5−9. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201311002
[18]	湖南省质量技术监督局. DB43/T275-2006 辣椒素测定及辣度表示方法[S]. 2006.
[19]	董彩军, 李锋, 卢国峰, 等. 辣椒及辣椒制品辣度分析研究进展[J]. 中国调味品,2016,41(12):142−146, 151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2016.12.033
[20]	曾岭岭, 王斌, 陈烨, 等. 辣味食品辣度量化分级技术研究[J]. 食品科学,2006,27(7):129−131. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2006.07.026
[21]	贾洪锋, 邓红, 梁爱华, 等. 川菜菜品的辣味物质分析与辣度分级[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(4):152−157. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201504029
[22]	杨代明, 马东兴, 李忠海, 等. 辣椒制品模糊辣度的表示与测定[J]. 食品与机械,2011,27(6):31−36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5788.2011.06.007
[23]	刘辉. 石柱主栽辣椒品种的干制及油制加工适性研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2011.
[24]	任朝晖, 廖卫琴, 周安韦, 等. 不同线椒品种品质评价[J]. 中国瓜菜,2019,32(7):26−30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2871.2019.07.006

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	姜秀杰，曹禛禛，吴睿喆，邵海益，马鑫悦，魏春红，迟晓星，张东杰. 酸面团中酵母菌的筛选及其在全麦馒头制作中的应用. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报. 2024(03): 65-71+79 .
2.	马森，王晓，钱晓洁，孙冰华，李力. 老面馒头风味物质和营养特性研究进展. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 134-142 .
3.	张艺，韩雅楠，贾紫毅，王成祥，赵鑫燕，高山. 基于高通量测序技术分析工业化老面菌群结构及其对馒头品质的影响. 粮食与油脂. 2024(10): 23-30 .
4.	刘艳红，康佳茜，肖诗雨，王赛民，周中凯. 益生菌对馒头感官品质及风味的影响. 中国食品学报. 2023(02): 164-172 .
5.	唐天培，黄自伟，张娜娜，闫博文，赵建新，张灏，陈卫，范大明. 酸面团发酵煎饼对2型糖尿病小鼠的影响. 中国食品学报. 2023(06): 121-131 .
6.	郭晶斐，贺霞霞，涂建，毛晓楠，周健康，陈宇钒，张丽珍，张国华. 酸面团中优势乳酸菌和酵母菌对麦谷蛋白结构的影响. 中国酿造. 2022(04): 142-146 .
7.	张国华，贺霞霞，卫晓蓉，赵明利，张越洋. 植物乳杆菌-Gm4发酵制备酸面团粉的工艺优化. 食品工业科技. 2022(11): 228-234 . 本站查看
8.	潘玲，冮洁，薛晨光，关颖贤. 酸汤子发酵工艺的优化及其品质分析. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2022(24): 7851-7858 .