Optimization of the Compounding Formula of Food Gums in Pork Sausage by Response Surface Method

WANG Xinying; CHEN Lianhong; DU Rongsheng; CAI Zijian; ZHANG Yan; WANG Linlin

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070265

Volume 42 Issue 14

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(14): 145-152. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070265

WANG Xinying, CHEN Lianhong, DU Rongsheng, et al. Optimization of the Compounding Formula of Food Gums in Pork Sausage by Response Surface Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(14): 145−152. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070265.

Citation:

PDF (1143 KB)

Optimization of the Compounding Formula of Food Gums in Pork Sausage by Response Surface Method

1.
College of Food Science and Technology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China
2.
China Agricultural Vet Biology and Technology Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730030, China
3.
College of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China

More Information

Received Date: July 22, 2020
Available Online: May 24, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the effects of adding different kinds of edible gums and its compound ratio on the product rate, water retention rate and sensory quality of pork sausage products, and obtain the best edible gum compound ratio. The pork sausage was used as the experimental object, and the mixture ratio of flaxseed gum, guar gum and konjac gum were used as the experimental factors. On the basis of single-factor test, Box-Behnken central group method was used to conduct three-factor and three-level response surface analysis test with product rate, water retention rate and the sensory score as response values. The results showed that the best mix proportion of the three kinds of edible gum were: flaxseed gum 0.50%, guar gum 0.40%, konjac gum 0.65%, the pork sausage product rate was 98.97%, and water retention rate was at a rate of 90.26% and the sensory score was 8.14 as well as the product had good elasticity and high overall acceptable degree. Meanwhile, the optimization results were accurate and reliable test, and may provide data support and theoretical reference for pork sausage processing technology research and quality.
- pork sausage,
- edible gum,
- mixed proportion,
- response surface optimization,
- product rate,
- water retention rate,
- sensory quality

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	Oliveira R F D, Henry F D C, Valle F D. Effect of the fruit aqueous extract of Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius, Raddi) on selected quality parameters of frozen fresh pork sausage[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research,2020(2):1−6.
[2]	Rather S A, Masoodi F A, Akhter R, et al. Effects of guar gum as fat replacer on some quality parameters of mutton goshtaba, a traditional Indian meat product[J]. Small Ruminant Research,2016,137:169−176. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.03.013
[3]	樊丽岩, 曹琪, 高鹏飞, 等. 亚麻籽粉粕和食用胶对猪肉灌肠质构的影响[J]. 肉类研究,2017,31(5):16−20.
[4]	赵改名, 孟子晴, 祝超智, 等. 不同食用胶与肉糜结合力的比较及对牛肉凝胶性能的影响研究[J]. 现代食品科技,2020,36(4):1−8.
[5]	孙健. 亚麻卫胶对肉制品保水性、乳化性、淀粉糊化和老化特性影响及其应用[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
[6]	曲金萍, 陈金玉, 张亚杰, 等. 玉米淀粉与食用胶共混体系理化性质的研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(10):1−5.
[7]	程春梅. 淀粉, 大豆蛋白和食用胶在肉制品加工中的应用[J]. 肉类工业,2008,6(8):46−47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5467.2008.08.013
[8]	扶庆泉, 周红霞, 曾华. 卡拉胶的复配特性及其在低温火腿中的应用[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2010,6(6):213−216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2513.2010.06.036
[9]	赵百忠, 董晓波, 张骞. 黄原胶在火腿肠中应用技术研究[J]. 肉类工业,2011,8(3):36−37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5467.2011.03.011
[10]	赵谋明, 杨园媛, 孙为正, 等. 魔芋胶, 瓜尔豆胶对猪肉脯品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2014,30(3):121−126.
[11]	孙健, 王鹏, 徐幸莲, 等. 猪肉肠中亚麻籽胶, 卡拉胶, 黄原胶的相互作用的研究[J]. 食品科学,2012,33(13):134−139.
[12]	高雪琴. 大豆分离蛋白和卡拉胶复配对调理猪肉制品品质的影响及机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015.
[13]	邓梦琦, 陈志奇, 冯雨, 等. 五香油鸽的炸制工艺优化[J]. 现代食品科技,2020,36(8):225−233.
[14]	孙健, 冯美琴, 王鹏, 等. 亚麻籽胶, 黄原胶与大豆分离蛋白对肉制品出品率和质构特性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2012,33(25):1−5.
[15]	Shand P J. Textural, water holding, and sensoy properties of low-fat pork bologna with normal or waxy starch huii-less barley[J]. Journal of Food Science,2000,65:101−107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15963.x
[16]	李俊. 赖氨酸和精氨酸分别对猪肉肠品质特性影响的研究[J]. 安徽: 合肥工业大学, 2013.
[17]	Chen H H, Xu S Y, Wang Z. Interaction between flaxseed gum and meat protein[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2007,80(4):1051−1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.08.017
[18]	Defreitas Z, Sebranek J G, Olson D G, et al. Carrageenan effects on thermal stability of meat proteins[J]. Journal of Food Science,1997,62(3):544−547. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb04426.x
[19]	Foegeding E A, Ramsry S R J. Rheological and water-holding properties of gelled meat batters containing iota carrageenan, kappa carrageeaner xanthan gum[J]. Journal of Food Science,1987,187(52):549−553.
[20]	陈志刚, 赵百忠, 陈涛. 亚麻籽胶在盐水火腿中的应用研究[J]. 肉类研究,2015(9):40−43.
[21]	张晓冬, 史峰山, 杜平, 等. 亚麻籽胶在斩拌型肉肠中的应用研究[J]. 食品科学,2003,24(11):88−91. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2003.11.019
[22]	Rather S A, Masoodi F A, Akhter R, et al. Effects of guar gum as a fat substitute in low fat meat emulsions[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation,2016:1−9.
[23]	Ulu H. Effects of carrageenan and guar gum on the cooking and textual properties of low fat meatballs[J]. Food Chemistry,2006,95:600−605. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.039
[24]	顾振东, 刘晓艳. 瓜尔豆胶的生产及其应用研究进展[J]. 广西轻工业,2010(7):1−13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2673.2010.07.001
[25]	Mahfoudhi N, Sessa M, Chouaibi M, et al. Assessment of emulsifying ability of almond gum in comparison with gum Arabic using response surface methodology[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2014,37(3):49−59.
[26]	黄明发, 鲁兴容, 刁兵, 等. 魔芋胶的功能特性及其在肉制品中的应用[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2012(1):186−190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2513.2012.01.026
[27]	周春丽, 米力, 胡雪雁, 等. 响应面法优化南瓜红枣复合运动饮料工艺研究[J]. 食品工业,2017,38(7):124−127.
[28]	Zhang Y, Liu Z, Li Y, et al. Optimization of ionic liquid-based microwave-assisted extraction of isoflavones from Radix puerariae by response surface methodology[J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2014,135(1):71−79.
[29]	Filip S, Pavlić B, Vidović S, et al. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from Ocimum basilicum by response surface methodology[J]. Food Analytical Methods,2017,10:2270−2280. doi: 10.1007/s12161-017-0792-7
[30]	He H J, Wang Y M, Farkas B, et al. Analysis and prediction of the diameter and orientation of AC electrospun nanofibers by response surface methodology[J]. Materials and Design,2020,194:1−11.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	宋永贵，陈运丽，苏丹，李前民，李惠珍，艾志福，杨明，朱根华，陈丽玲. 龙骨-牡蛎通过调节肠道微生态增强柴胡加龙骨牡蛎汤的抗抑郁效应. 中成药. 2025(02): 625-633 .
2.	崔雨婷，张方圆，许伟明，李子贇，胡镜清. 基于肠道菌群与冠心病的关系探讨“阴火”科学内涵. 世界中医药. 2024(09): 1279-1285 .
3.	叶清珠，王苗苗. 植物抗菌色素在抗菌纺织品中的应用. 上海纺织科技. 2024(07): 8-11+17 .
4.	尹东，杜丽坤，徐洪涛，任那，张天昊. 基于肠道菌群探析中医药治疗肥胖的研究进展. 西部中医药. 2024(09): 111-114 .
5.	王其龙，杨景森，黄凯勇，朱翠. 小檗碱调控动物肠道菌群稳态的研究进展. 中国畜牧杂志. 2022(02): 23-26+31 .
6.	罗晓璐，李丽娜，黎京荣，彭啸峰，吴鹏，朱翠. 饲喂有抗或无抗饲粮的黄羽肉鸡在不同日龄下肠道菌群的变化. 广东畜牧兽医科技. 2022(01): 6-13 .
7.	余佳，高欣悦，付凤萍，吴建英，余琳，陈红英. 半仿生-比色法测定三黄泻心汤中总生物碱的溶出量. 湖北农业科学. 2022(03): 140-143 .
8.	柯群华，彭晶，王胜义. 中药与肠道菌群及其代谢相关研究进展. 中兽医医药杂志. 2022(02): 35-40 .
9.	刘良浩，蒋志滨，于海洋，吴志斌，李泠君，唐甜，高洁. 黄连素缓解肠易激综合征作用机制的研究进展. 中国病理生理杂志. 2022(05): 944-948 .
10.	姚广丰，张奇，张楠，隋玲玲，刘佳，李威，胡铁军. 盐酸小檗碱相关杂质的合成. 辽宁化工. 2022(06): 763-765 .