Optimization of Tendon Yogurt Jelly Formula by Response Surface Method

GUAN Jiaqi; KE Chuxin; HUANG He; LI Bailiang; JIAO Wenshu; LENG Youbin; HUO Guicheng

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020020156

Volume 42 Issue 3

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(3): 171-178. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020020156

GUAN Jiaqi, KE Chuxin, HUANG He, LI Bailiang, JIAO Wenshu, LENG Youbin, HUO Guicheng. Optimization of Tendon Yogurt Jelly Formula by Response Surface Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(3): 171-178. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020020156

Citation:

PDF (2427 KB)

Optimization of Tendon Yogurt Jelly Formula by Response Surface Method

1. Key Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
2. Heilongjiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin 150030, China;
3. Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co., Ltd., Beijing 100015, China

More Information

Received Date: February 16, 2020
Available Online: February 02, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Taking yoghurt as the main raw material and collagen extracted from tendon as coagulant,the optimal formula of yoghurt jelly was studied by single factor experiment and Box-Behnken response surface experiment. The results showed that the optimized process parameters were 43% of the additive amount of colloidal solution,15.5% of the additive amount of sucrose and 0.11% of the additive amount of anhydrous citric acid. At this time,the elasticity of the yogurt jelly was 0.945 and the sensory score was 86.The optimized yogurt jelly had good texture and sensory quality,the physicochemical and physiological indexes of which were both in line with the national regulations. The processing technology could lay a theoretical basis for the development of yogurt jelly.
- yogurt jelly,
- tendon,
- collagen,
- response surface

FullText(HTML)

References (32)

References

[1]	Hobbs D A,Givens D I,Lovegrove J A. Yogurt consumption is associated with higher nutrient intake,diet quality and favourable metabolic profile in children:A cross-sectional analysis using data from years 1~4 of the national diet and nutrition survey,UK[J]. European Journal of Nutrition,2018(Suppl 2):1-14.
[2]	刁治民,于学军.发酵乳的营养价值及保健作用[J].中国乳品工业,1998(5):11-14,16.
[3]	汪倩,咸娜,胡国华.明胶复合胶在酸奶中的应用研究[J].中国食品添加剂,2018(10):162-172.
[4]	胡国华.明胶在食品工业中的应用[N].中国食品安全报,2015-02-05(B02).
[5]	Ohba R,Deguchi T. Physiological functions of enzymatic hydrolysates of collagen or keratin containedin lives tock and fish waste[J].Food Science and Technology Research,2003,9(1):91-93.
[6]	Mizuta S,Isobe S. Existence of two molecular species of collagen in the muscle layer of the ascidian(Halocynthia roretzi)[J]. Food Chemistry,2002,79(1):9-13.
[7]	Garza H,Bennett N,Rodiguez P. Improved rapid method for the isolation,purification and identification of collagen glycosides[J].J Chromatogr A,1996,732:385-389.
[8]	张莉,姜新杰,刘英娜.薄荷黄瓜果冻的制作工艺及优化[J].食品与发酵科技,2019,55(5):45-50.
[9]	田华,黄珍.保健果冻研究现状与展望[J].食品研究与开发,2019,40(4):215-219.
[10]	Lilian E,Figueroa,Diego B,et al. Fruit jellies enriched with dietary fibre:Development and characterization of a novel functional food product[J]. LWT,2019,111:423-428.
[11]	马雪灵. 中药复方保健果冻的研制及活性成分分析[C]. 中国食品科学技术学会(Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology).中国食品科学技术学会第十六届年会暨第十届中美食品业高层论坛论文摘要集.中国食品科学技术学会(Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology):中国食品科学技术学会,2019:214-215.
[12]	Iegaki N,Narita Y,Hattori N,et al. Royal jelly reduces depression-like behavior through possible effects on adrenal steroidogenesis in a murine model of unpredictable chronic mild stress[J]. Journal of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan,2020,84(3):606-612.
[13]	宋雪健,王洪江,张东杰. 琼脂在食品中的应用研究进展[J].现代农业科技,2017(12):267-268,272.
[14]	商军华. 酸奶冻的研制[J]. 食品工业,1996(1):26-27.
[15]	胡文娥,陈婉君,杨文杰.胡萝卜风味皮冻的加工工艺研究[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版),2014,32(1):43-46.
[16]	.李晓东.乳品工艺学[M].北京:科学出版社,2016:149-152.
[17]	胡文娥,林士强.食用明胶对凝固型酸奶质量的影响探究[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版),2015,33(6):22-25.
[18]	魏玉,王元兰,胡云楚.κ-卡拉胶与魔芋胶共混凝胶的质构特性研究[J].食品科学,2010(5):96-100.
[19]	梁晓娟,陈静,张文哲,等.响应面法优化百合果冻配方[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(1):221-226 ,234.
[20]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T10786-2006中华人民共和国国家标准一罐头食品的检验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[21]	中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB 4789.2-2016食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验菌落总数测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[22]	中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB 4789.3-2016食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验大肠菌群计数[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[23]	中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB 4789.15-2016食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验霉菌和酵母计数[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[24]	费荣昌.试验设计与数据处理[M].无锡:江南大学出版社,2001:59-63.
[25]	Cairns P,Miles M J,Morris V J. X-ray diffraction studies of kappa carrageenan-tara gum mixed gels[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,1986,8(2):124-127.
[26]	杨玉玲,张沫,陈银基,等.绿豆淀粉凝胶的质构特性和超微结构研究[J].中国粮油学报,2014,29(4):36-41.
[27]	刘朝龙,王雨生,陈海华,等.果冻质构与感官评定相关性的研究[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,29(2):115-120.
[28]	原秀玲,王玉华,蔡丹,等.响应面法优化干法糖基化改性乳清蛋白成膜性[J].中国食品学报,2016(7):105-112.
[29]	Acosta O,Viquez F,Cubero E. Optimization of low calorie mixed fruit jelly by response surface methodology[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2008,19(1):79-85.
[30]	谢桂勉,杨培新,郑锐东,等.响应曲面法优化淮山紫薯复合风味果冻工艺[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(16):285-289.
[31]	中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会GB 5009.237-2016食品安全国家标准食品pH的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[32]	中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会GB/T 19883-2018果冻[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(11)

1.	杨集镪，曾穗雯. 原子荧光光谱仪测定食品中汞含量的研究. 食品安全导刊. 2023(01): 111-113 .
2.	程梦蓉，蒋国振，王婧，吴静，姬玲霞. 直接测汞仪测定大米粉中总汞含量的不确定度评定. 粮食与食品工业. 2023(03): 53-58 .
3.	梁良，杜雨馨，杨子建. 基于支持向量机的多环芳烃光谱定量分析. 激光杂志. 2023(06): 220-224 .
4.	金凯. 测汞仪直接测定水中汞的不确定度评定. 现代食品. 2023(23): 166-169 .
5.	赵忠良. 原子荧光仪在地质矿物硒元素测定中的应用. 化工管理. 2022(18): 103-105 .
6.	姚成虎，王滢，杨启鹏，洪成山，王岁岁，孙涓，毛小庆. 电感耦合等离子质谱法测定蟹黄中4种重金属含量的不确定度评定. 现代农业科技. 2022(18): 155-159+164 .
7.	张阔，冯金奎，鄂立军. 照度测量不确定度研究. 中国特种设备安全. 2022(10): 22-25+41 .
8.	王娟，华蓉，游金坤，邓雅元，孙达锋，杨璐敏，吴素蕊. 影响食用菌总汞含量测定准确度的关键技术探索. 中国食用菌. 2022(11): 60-66 .
9.	贺璐，郑静. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定食品中钙、镁、磷、铁、锌、锰含量的不确定度评定. 化学分析计量. 2022(12): 83-87 .
10.	李娟，辜芸，谭洪涛，周鸿. 婴幼儿食品中总汞含量检测方法的研究. 实验与检验医学. 2022(05): 524-525+546 .
11.	程君，卢嘉砾，余松柏. 催化热解-冷原子吸收分光光度法测定石膏中总汞的不确定度评定. 中国水泥. 2022(S1): 16-21 .