SUN Jing, DENG Shu-ying, LI You, WANG Wen-liang, ZHENG Yan, SUN Yue, SUI Yong. Effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating on fresh-keeping of duck eggs[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (18): 295-299. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.056
Citation: SUN Jing, DENG Shu-ying, LI You, WANG Wen-liang, ZHENG Yan, SUN Yue, SUI Yong. Effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating on fresh-keeping of duck eggs[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (18): 295-299. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.056

Effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating on fresh-keeping of duck eggs

More Information
  • Received Date: February 27, 2017
  • To evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating on fresh-keeping of duck eggs, the fresh eggs were treated by sodium hypochlorite disinfection, polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating, and sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating. All the duck eggs were stored at the same condition for 35 days and the changes of weight loss rate, total plate count, Hough units and yolk index value of duck eggs in each group were detected during storage process.The changes of the eggshell color and texture properties of duck eggs by three fresh-keeping treatments were also detected after storage. The results revealed that the weight loss rate and total plate count of duck eggs in three fresh-keeping groups were significantly decreased in comparison with control group ( p < 0.05) , and the disinfection combined with coating showed the lowest weight loss rate ( 2.79% ± 0.19%) and total platecount ( 4.83 ± 0.42) lg cfu/g. The Hough units and yolk index value of duck eggs in three fresh-keeping groups were significantly increased in comparison with control group ( p < 0.05) , and the disinfection combined with coating showed the highest Hough units ( 76.09 ± 4.15) and yolk index value ( 0.40 ± 0.02) , with no obvious difference to the fresh eggs before storage.In addition, the texture properties of eggs treated by disinfection combined with coating showed no significant difference relative to control group ( p > 0.05) , but the brightness was notably improved ( p < 0.05) .In conclusion, the three fresh-keeping treatments were significantly reversed the decline of the quality of duck eggs in comparison with control group ( p < 0.05) .To be mentioned, sodium hypochlorite disinfection combined with polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nanoSiO2 coating exhibited the best fresh-keeping effect, which was significantly better than treated by sodium hypochlorite disinfection and polyvinyl alcohol-based composite packaging material with nano-SiO2 coating alone ( p < 0.05) . This study might provide reference for the application of disinfection combined with composite packaging material coating in the preservation of fresh eggs.
  • [1]
    周有祥, 夏虹, 彭茂民, 等.鲜鸭蛋及其制品的营养成分初步分析[J].湖北农业科学, 2009, 48 (10) :2553-2556.
    [2]
    唐丽君, 邓泽元, 范亚苇.加工鸭蛋蛋黄脂类变化的GC分析[J].食品科学, 2006, 27 (12) :588-590.
    [3]
    Kaewmanee T, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W.Changes in chemical composition, physical properties and microstructure of duck egg as influenced by salting[J].Food Chemistry, 2009, 112 (3) :560-569.
    [4]
    李荷丽, 刘力, 彭义, 等.鲜鸭蛋贮藏期卫生质量及其变化规律[J].食品安全, 2010, 46 (24) :27-30.
    [5]
    龙门, 马磊, 宋野, 等.纳米Fe3+/Ti O2改性聚乙烯醇基紫胶复合膜对鸡蛋的保鲜效果[J].农业工程学报, 2014, 30 (20) :313-324.
    [6]
    肖然, 张华江, 迟玉杰, 等.几种化学方法对鲜蛋表面杀菌效果的对比研究[J].中国家禽, 2013, 35 (1) :25-28.
    [7]
    程文杰.气体二氧化氯在鸡蛋杀菌保鲜中的研究[D].无锡:江南大学, 2013:6.
    [8]
    王耀峰, 刘良忠, 宫智勇, 等.二氧化氯在鲜蛋消毒保鲜中的应用研究[J].食品科学, 2008, 29 (11) :632-636.
    [9]
    刘文营, 王飞, 郭立华, 等.壳蛋保鲜与液蛋杀菌技术研究进展[J].中国家禽, 2012, 34 (19) :45-48.
    [10]
    肖然, 张华江, 迟玉杰, 等.不同处理方法对鸡蛋表面消毒效果的比较研究[J].食品工业科技, 2013, 34 (2) :129-132.
    [11]
    李述刚, 刘莉如, 张锐利, 等.OHAA涂膜保鲜剂对鸡蛋保鲜效果研究[J].食品研究与开发, 2011, 32 (5) :146-149.
    [12]
    刘会珍.鸡蛋涂膜保鲜工艺的实验研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2005:10.
    [13]
    Prasanna V, Prabha T N, Tharanathan R N.Multiple forms of polygalacturonase from mango (Mangifera indica L.cv Alphonso) fruit[J].Food Chemistry, 2006, 95 (1) :30-36.
    [14]
    雷艳雄.PVA基复合包装材料纳米Si O2改性及其对咸鸭蛋保鲜效果的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2011:3.
    [15]
    梁花兰.聚乙烯醇基涂膜材料及其对咸鸭蛋涂膜保鲜包装效果的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2009:12.
    [16]
    付星.OHAA复合涂膜剂研制及其对鸡蛋保鲜应用研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学, 2010:6.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (247) PDF downloads (142) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return