生防菌株洋葱伯克氏菌对草莓果实采后病害控制及安全性评价

范三红; 张婧婷; 施俊凤

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.01.018

生防菌株洋葱伯克氏菌对草莓果实采后病害控制及安全性评价

1. 山西大学生命科学学院, 山西太原 030006;
2. 山西省农业科学院农产品贮藏保鲜研究所, 山西太原 030031

基金项目:

山西省重点研发项目(201703D221010-1)

山西省农业科学院博士后基金项目(BSH-2015JJ-003)。

详细信息

作者简介:
范三红(1963-),男,硕士,教授,研究方向:食品科学,E-mail:fsh729@sxu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
施俊凤(1977-),女,博士,副研究员,研究方向:采后病害及生物防治,E-mail:sjfty@126.com。

中图分类号: TS201.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 149
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 4
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-05-26
- 网络出版日期: 2020-12-28
- 刊出日期: 2017-12-31

Control of strawberry fruit postharvest decay by antagonistic bacterium Burkholderia contaminans and its safety evaluation

1. College of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Institute of Agricultural Product Storage and Fresh Keeping, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Taiyuan 030031, China

摘要

摘要: 采用自然腐烂法和伤口接种法研究生防菌株洋葱伯克氏菌Burkholderia contaminans(简称B-1),在不同发酵时间、处理方式和处理液对草莓果实采后贮藏的影响,并进行该生防菌的大鼠急性经口毒性实验、家兔皮肤及眼刺激性实验和豚鼠皮肤变态反应(致敏)实验。结果表明:与CK相比,生防菌B-1发酵培养24 h、采后果实浸泡3 min及稀释5倍的发酵液处理草莓果实,其采后腐烂率分别下降了55.04%、46.74%和39.98%,而且发酵原液、稀释5倍发酵液及菌悬液对草莓果实伤口接种灰霉病抑制率达100%。该生防菌的大鼠急性LD₅₀>5000 mg/kg,皮肤刺激强度和眼刺激积分指数(I.A.O.I)为0,眼刺激平均指数(M.I.O.I)48 h为0,皮肤变态反应(致敏)实验致敏率为0。本研究表明该细菌作为生防菌具有安全性,为该生防菌的生产性应用奠定基础。
- 洋葱伯克氏菌 /
- 草莓 /
- 采后病害 /
- 抑制率 /
- 安全性评价
Abstract: The effects of different fermentation times, treatment methods and treatment solutions of the antagonistic bacterium Burkholderia contaminans B-1 on the postharvest storage of strawberry fruit were studied by natural decay and wound inoculation method. And the safety evaluation of the antagonistic bacterium B-1 including acute oral toxicity test on rats, skin, eyes irritation test on healthy rabbits and dermal allergy reaction on guinea pigs were performed. The results showed that inhibition rate of 24 hours culturing, 3 minutes immersing and with dilution five times of the fermented liquid were decreased by 55.04%, 46.74%, 39.98% respectively compared with the CK. The inhibition rate of gray mold on strawberry fruit reached 100% in the treatment of fermentation solution, diluted 5 times fermentation broth and bacterial suspension. The antagonistic bacteria in rats with acute LD₅₀>5000 mg/kg. The mean index of skin irritation and eye irritation(I.A.O.I)on rabbits were 0. The mean index of eye irritation(M.I.O.I)were 0 after 48 hours. Sensitization rate of skin sensitization(sensitization)test was 0. The result indicated that the bacterium is safe as a biocontrol bacterium. This study laid the foundation for the productive application of the biocontrol bacterium.
- Burkholderia contaminans /
- strawberry /
- postharvest disease /
- inhibition rate /
- safety evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	Yang S,Yang S Y,Zhang C P,et al. Population dynamics of Myzus persicae on tobacco in Yunnan Province,China,before and after augmentative releases of Aphiduis gifuensis[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology,2009,19(2):219-228.
[2]	张旭,尚楠,张宝,等.抗瓜果腐霉芽孢杆菌优良菌株的筛选及生物学特性[J].食品科学,2012,33(5):138-143.
[3]	Coenye T,Vandamme P,Govan J R W,et al. Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,2001,39(10):3427-3436.
[4]	Poupin M J,Timmermann T,Vega A,et al. Effects of the plant growth bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLos One,2013,8(7):e69435.
[5]	Johnson S L,Bishop-Lilly K A,LADNER J T,et al. Complete genome sequences for 59 burkholderia isolates,both pathogenic and near neighbor[J]. Genome Announcements,2015,3(2):e00159-15.
[6]	Seo Y S,Lim J Y,Park J,et al. Comparative genome analysis of rice-pathogenic Burkholderia provides insight into capacity to adapt to different environments and hosts[J]. BMC Cenomics,2015,16(1);349.
[7]	Coenye T,Vandamme P. Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches[J]. Environmental Microbiology,2003,5(9):719-729.
[8]	De S B,Mayo M,Peeters C,et al. Burkholderia stagnalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia territorii sp. nov. two novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species from environment and human sources[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2015,65(7):2265-2271.
[9]	Parke J L,Guriansherman D. Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology,2001,39(1):225-258.
[10]	CostaD,Erabadupitiya H. An integrated method to control postharvest diseases of banana using a member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex[J]. Postharvest Biology&Technology,2005,36(1):31-39.
[11]	范三红,李静,施俊凤.拮抗菌Burkholderia contaminans对玫瑰香葡萄采后灰霉病的抗性诱导[J].食品科学,2016,37(2):266-270.
[12]	Ki H K,Kim S H,Han S W,et al. A case of native valve endocarditis caused by Burkholderia cepacia without predisposing factors[J]. BMC Infectious Diseases,2011,11(1):1-4.
[13]	徐成良.洋葱伯克霍尔德菌的耐药性分析[J].上海预防医学,2016(7):484-485.
[14]	胡娟,樵星芳,韦莉,等.饮水中洋葱伯克霍尔德菌的分离鉴定及消毒剂灭活实验[J].环境工程,2016,(S1):6-8.
[15]	Lynch K H,Deenis J J. LCangene gold medal award lecture-Genomic analysis and modification of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteriophages[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2012,58(3):221-235.
[16]	Holden M,Sethsmith H,Crossman L,et al. The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315,an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients[J]. Journal of Bacteriology,2009,191(1):261-277.
[17]	李静.伯克霍尔德氏菌Burkholderia contaminans B-1对玫瑰香葡萄采后病害生防潜力研究[D].太原:山西大学,2016.
[18]	赵妍.拮抗酵母及结合热空气处理对樱桃番茄采后病害的防治及其机理研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2010.
[19]	中华人民共和国农业部. GB 15670-1995中华人民共和国国家标准农药登记毒理学实验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1995.
[20]	韩超,武贵元,刘爱新,等.吡咯伯克霍尔德氏菌A12筛选鉴定及其对烟草幼苗的促生作用[J].浙江农业学报,2012,24(5):880-885.
[21]	Van V T,Berge O,Ke S N,et al. Repeated beneficial effects of rice inoculation with a strain of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on early and late yield component in low feitility sulphate acid soils of Vietnam[J]. Plant and Soil,2012,218(1):273-284.
[22]	范青,田世平,姜爱丽,等.采摘后果实病害生物防治拮抗菌的筛选和分离[J].中国环境科学,2001,21(4):313-316.
[23]	Vandamme P,Holmes B,Coenye T,et al. Burkholderia cenocepacia sp. nov.-a new twist to an old story[J]. Research in Microbiology,2003,154(2):91-96.
[24]	Vanlaere E,Lipuma J J,Baldwin A,et al. Burkholderia latens sp. nov.,Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov.,Burkholderia arboris sp. nov.,Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov.,novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2008,58(7):1580-1590.
[25]	Vanlaere E,Baldwin A,Gevers D,et al. Taxon K,a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex,comprises at least two novel species,Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2009,59(1):102-111.
[26]	张立新,苏婷,谢关林.洋葱伯克氏菌群不同基因型菌株对几种重要植物病原真菌的抑制作用及其潜在致病性[J].中国生物防治,2009,25(1):25-29.
[27]	Ramos C G,Sousa S A,Grilo A M,et al. The Burkholderia cenocepacia K56-2 pleiotropic regulator Pbr,is required for stress resistance and virulence[J]. Microbial Pathogenesis,2010,48(5):168-177.

施引文献(9)

期刊类型引用(6)

1.	李元跃，柏皓，陈融斌，陈政强，肖震，潘煌杰，李相威，陈凤淋，王秋荣. 福建东山湾人工养殖池红树林浮岛养殖拟穴青蟹(Scylla paramamosain)的生长及肌肉营养成分分析. 海洋与湖沼. 2023(06): 1716-1727 . 百度学术
2.	平泽禹，郑尧，郭全友，杨柳，李保国. 不同规格的南极磷虾营养品质差异研究. 食品与发酵科技. 2022(03): 82-91 . 百度学术
3.	石钢鹏，高天麒，阙凤，汪超，乔宇，石柳，吴文锦，于巍，丁安子，李新，廖李，熊光权，汪兰. 不同捕捞月份和规格克氏原螯虾品质比较. 食品工业科技. 2022(19): 53-60 . 本站查看
4.	李倩，全天秀，李祖明，白志辉. 狐尾藻营养活性成分的研究. 食品工业科技. 2019(11): 318-322 . 本站查看
5.	文艺晓，彭吉星，郭莹莹，王婧媛，左红和，王联珠. HPLC-ELSD检测南极磷虾油中磷脂含量. 南方农业学报. 2019(10): 2293-2299 . 百度学术
6.	彭静文，张艳霞，从娇娇，王锡昌. 不同囤养阶段雌性中华绒螯蟹体肉脂含量和脂肪酸组成的比较. 现代食品科技. 2018(12): 96-103 . 百度学术