• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020

酸浸减压法腌制咸蛋与传统咸蛋的对比

邵萍, 刘会平, 邹乾, 田丽元, 刘易坤, 董越

邵萍, 刘会平, 邹乾, 田丽元, 刘易坤, 董越. 酸浸减压法腌制咸蛋与传统咸蛋的对比[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, (18): 8-13. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.002
引用本文: 邵萍, 刘会平, 邹乾, 田丽元, 刘易坤, 董越. 酸浸减压法腌制咸蛋与传统咸蛋的对比[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, (18): 8-13. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.002
SHAO Ping, LIU Hui-ping, ZOU Qian, TIAN Li-yuan, LIU Yi-kun, DONG Yue. The contrast of salted eggs produced by soaking in acid combined with reduced pressure vacuum technology and the traditional method of brine immersion[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (18): 8-13. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.002
Citation: SHAO Ping, LIU Hui-ping, ZOU Qian, TIAN Li-yuan, LIU Yi-kun, DONG Yue. The contrast of salted eggs produced by soaking in acid combined with reduced pressure vacuum technology and the traditional method of brine immersion[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (18): 8-13. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.18.002

酸浸减压法腌制咸蛋与传统咸蛋的对比

详细信息
    作者简介:

    邵萍 (1991-) , 女, 硕士研究生, 研究方向:动物资源与功能食品, E-mail:15222055015@163.com。;

    刘会平 (1964-) , 男, 博士, 教授, 研究方向:动物资源与功能食品, E-mail:liuhuiping111@163.com。;

  • 中图分类号: TS253.4

The contrast of salted eggs produced by soaking in acid combined with reduced pressure vacuum technology and the traditional method of brine immersion

  • 摘要: 将酸浸减压技术应用于咸蛋的传统盐水浸泡工艺中,将各理化指标变化与传统腌制的咸蛋进行对比。实验结果表明:酸浸减压法腌制咸蛋过程中,蛋清和蛋黄含盐量增长率较快,生产周期由32 d缩短至6 d;与传统咸蛋相比,各指标最终结果无较大差异,符合咸蛋应有的标准。随着时间的延长,两者的出油率都达到16%以上,无显著差异,符合市场需求。GC-MS法分析脂肪酸和风味物质组成成分,得出两种咸蛋黄均含有13种脂肪酸,成分一致,相对含量上有小范围波动,但酸浸减压法咸蛋的风味物质较传统法多了4种。电镜观察发现酸处理后蛋壳表面变得粗糙,气孔暴露,有利于腌制过程的进行。 
    Abstract: The acid soaking pretreatment combined with reduced pressure vacuum technology was applied in the traditional method of brine immersion to produce salted eggs.The physicochemical changes of the salted eggs obtained by the two methods were compared.The results showed that the salinity both egg white and yolk increased faster and the production cycle was shortened from 32 days to 6 days.Compared with the traditional salted eggs, the eggs produced by the new technology showed no significant difference, and meet the standard of salted egg. Over time, the oil exudation of two groups had reached more than16%.The fatty acids and flavor components were analyzed by GC-MS.The results showed that both the two kinds of salted egg yolk contained 13 kinds of fatty acids, of which the components were the same, and the relative contents fluctuated in a small range.While the flavor substances of the salted eggs obtained by the new method were four kinds more than those of the traditional ones.When observed by electron microscope, the surface of eggshell became rough after acid treatment, which was beneficial to the curing process.
  • [1] 苏鹤, 杨瑞金, 赵伟, 等.咸鸭蛋的快速腌制及品质控制技术研究进展[J].食品研究与开发, 2016, 37 (17) :205-208.
    [2] 迟玉杰, 胥伟, 刘振宇.咸蛋与咸蛋黄的腌制技术[C].2011.
    [3] 刘清莹, 张琨, 彭光华, 等.七种保鲜剂和涂膜剂对咸蛋保鲜效果的比较[J].粮油食品科技, 2007, 15 (3) :59-61.
    [4] 潘康, 冯枭, 李蓉, 等.盐水法和包灰法腌制咸蛋理化性质的比较[J].食品与生物技术学报, 2011, 30 (4) :542-548.
    [5]

    Kaewmanee T, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W.Effect of Acetic Acid and Commercial Protease Pretreatment on Salting and Characteristics of Salted Duck Egg[J].Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2012, 5 (5) :1502-1510.

    [6] 李帅俊, 凌刚.咸鸭蛋的快速腌制技术及改善其品质的研究[J].食品工业科技, 2006 (2) :95-96.
    [7]

    Lai K M, Ko W C, Lai T H.Effect of NaC l Penetration Rate on the Granulation and Oil-Off of the Yolk of Salted Duck Egg[J].Food Science&Technology International Tokyo, 1997, 3 (3) :269-273.

    [8]

    Ji L, Liu H, Cao C, et al.Chemical and structural changes in preserved white egg during pickled by vacuum technology[J].Food Science&Technology International, 2013, 19 (2) :123-31.

    [9] 罗扬, 刘成国, 陈瑶, 等.真空腌制技术及其在食品加工中的应用研究[J].肉类研究, 2010, (6) :31-34.
    [10]

    AOAC.Official method of analytical chemists (17th ed.) [M].Arlington:The Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc, 2000.

    [11] 袁晓龙, 高婧娴, 杜颖, 等.气调储藏中不同平衡气体对鸡蛋保鲜品质的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2014, 35 (2) :300-303.
    [12] 曾舟, 马美湖, 何兰, 等.不同腌制添加剂对咸蛋腌制效果的影响[J].中国食品学报, 2012, 12 (10) :140-148.
    [13]

    Kaewmanee T, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W.Effects of Salting Processes and Time on the Chemical Composition, Textural Properties, and Microstructure of Cooked Duck Egg[J].Journal of Food Science, 2011, 76 (2) :139-147.

    [14]

    Lai K M, Chi S P, Ko W C.Changes in yolk states of duck egg during long-term brining[J].Journal of Agricultural&Food Chemistry, 1999, 47 (2) :733-736.

    [15]

    SimcˇicˇM, Stibilj V, Holcman A.Fatty acid composition of eggs produced by the Slovenian autochthonous Styrian hen[J].Food Chemistry, 2011, 125 (3) :873-877.

    [16] 周芹.咸蛋黄质地与风味的研究[D].天津:天津科技大学, 2011.
    [17]

    Dauphin Y, Cuif J P, SaloméM, et al.Microstructure and chemical composition of giant avian eggshells[J].Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2006, 386 (6) :1761-1771.

    [18]

    Thammarat K, Soottawat B, Wonnop V.Changes in chemical composition, physical properties and microstructure of duck egg as influenced by salting[J].Food Chemistry, 2009, 112 (3) :560-569.

    [19] 冯月超, 刘美玉, 任发政.热处理对鸡蛋黄挥发性风味的影响[J].肉类研究, 2006 (10) :31-33.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  235
  • HTML全文浏览量:  35
  • PDF下载量:  302
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-01-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭