• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
吴婧娇,田欢,黄峰,等. 老汤卤制与定量卤制酱牛肉的品质差异[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(22):43−51. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010178.
引用本文: 吴婧娇,田欢,黄峰,等. 老汤卤制与定量卤制酱牛肉的品质差异[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(22):43−51. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010178.
WU Jingjiao, TIAN Huan, HUANG Feng, et al. Quality Difference between Aged Brine Marinated andQuantitative Marinated Beef[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 43−51. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010178.
Citation: WU Jingjiao, TIAN Huan, HUANG Feng, et al. Quality Difference between Aged Brine Marinated andQuantitative Marinated Beef[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(22): 43−51. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010178.

老汤卤制与定量卤制酱牛肉的品质差异

Quality Difference between Aged Brine Marinated andQuantitative Marinated Beef

  • 摘要: 为研究不同卤制方式酱牛肉的品质差异,分析老汤卤制和定量卤制条件下,酱牛肉的感官评定、色泽、剪切力、质构、水分分布、呈味核苷酸以及游离氨基酸等指标的变化,确定不同卤制方式对酱牛肉品质的影响。结果表明:两种卤制方式中,定量卤制酱牛肉的感官评分高于老汤卤制。与老汤卤制的酱牛肉相比,定量卤制酱牛肉色泽较佳,剪切力和硬度较小(P<0.05),定量卤制的酱牛肉水分含量高且水分分布均匀。在主要呈味物质中,定量卤制酱牛肉中5′-AMP、5′-IMP和5′-GMP的含量均显著高于老汤卤制酱牛肉(P<0.05),说明其鲜味强度大于传统卤制酱牛肉。定量卤制和老汤卤制酱牛肉的总游离氨基酸含量分别为475.60和274.66 mg/100 g。由此可见,定量卤制酱牛肉相比老汤卤制可明显提升产品品质,这对酱卤肉制品产业升级具有重要推动作用。

     

    Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the quality differences of sauced beef with aged brine and quantitative marinating methods by evaluating sensory characteristics, color, shear force, texture, moisture distribution, taste nucleotides, and free amino acids. Results showed that quantitative marinated beef received a higher score in sensory evaluation than aged brine marinated beef. Additionally, quantitative marinated beef had better color, lower shear force and hardness compared to aged brine marinated beef (P<0.05). It also had a higher moisture content and more even moisture distribution. The quantitative marinating method resulted in higher levels of 5′-AMP, 5′-IMP, and 5′-GMP in the beef sauce, which enhanced its umami intensity (P<0.05). Moreover, the total free amino acid content was higher in quantitative marinated beef (475.60 mg/100 g) than aged brine marinated beef (274.66 mg/100 g). These findings suggested that the use of quantitative marinating method can significantly improve the quality of marinated beef products and promote the industry's advancement.

     

/

返回文章
返回