Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method

GAO Man; JIA Jianhui; ZHOU Xun; ZHANG Chujia; DOU Boxin; LIU Ying; ZHANG Na

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100

Volume 44 Issue 10

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2023 > 44(10): 264-269. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100

GAO Man, JIA Jianhui, ZHOU Xun, et al. Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10): 264−269. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100.

Citation:

PDF (1159 KB)

Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method

GAO Man^1,,
JIA Jianhui^{1, 2},
ZHOU Xun¹,
ZHANG Chujia¹,
DOU Boxin¹,
LIU Ying^1, ,,
ZHANG Na^1, ,

1.
College of Food Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China
2.
College of Life Science and Technology, Mudanjiang Normal University, Mudanjiang 157011, China

More Information

Received Date: July 11, 2022
Available Online: March 19, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

It is of great significance to study a rapid and accurate method for determining the digestion characteristics of japonica rice starch. Taking japonica rice starch as the research object and the determination results of AOAC method (AOAC Official Method 2002.02) as the standard, the test conditions of Englyst method were optimized to obtain a determination method, which was suitable for the digestion characteristics of japonica rice starch. The accuracy and precision of the determination results were analyzed. When the hydrolysis time was 270 min, the proportion of mixed enzymes was 10:1, the amount of mixed enzyme was AMY (3600 U)+AMG (360 U), the pH of mixed enzyme was 6.0, and the sample was not gelatinized, there was no significant difference between the RS content 2.13%±0.05% measured by the improved Englyst method and that 2.02%±0.06% measured by AOAC method. Compared with the AOAC method, the determination time was adjusted from 16 h of AOAC method to 270 min, the test time was greatly shortened. Compared with Englyst method, the improved method 2.13%±0.05% had good repeatability. Therefore, the improved Englyst method can quickly and accurately determine the digestion characteristics of japonica rice starch.
- japonica rice starch,
- digestion characteristics,
- AOAC method,
- Englyst method,
- method optimization

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	芦鑫, 张晖, 姚惠源. 不同提取方法对粳米淀粉结构的影响[J]. 食品科学,2008,29(1):102−106. [LU Xin, ZHANG Hui, YAO Huiyuan. Effects of different extraction methods on the structure of japonica rice starch[J]. Food Science,2008,29(1):102−106.
[2]	REBEIRA S P, PRASANTHA B D R, JAYATILAKE D V, et al. A comparative study of dietary fiber content, in vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non-pigmented traditional and improved rice[J]. Food Research International,2022,157:111389. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389
[3]	CHENG Z H, LI J N, QIAO D L, et al. Microwave reheating enriches resistant starch in cold-chain cooked rice: A view of structural alterations during digestion[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2022,208:80−87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.034
[4]	ZHENG J, HUANG S, ZHAO R Y, et al. Effect of four viscous soluble dietary fibers on the physicochemical, structural properties, and in vitro digestibility of rice starch: A comparison study[J]. Food Chemistry,2021,362:130181. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130181
[5]	BIAN J L, REN G L, FANG-FU X U, et al. Comparison of grain yield and quality of different types of japonica rice cultivars in the northern Jiangsu plain, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20(8):2065−2076. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63348-2
[6]	丁国华, 白良明, 孙世臣, 等. 黑龙江省国审水稻品种龙稻115的选育[J]. 中国种业,2020,05:61−62. [DING Guohua, BAI Liangming, SUN Shichen, et al. Breeding of Longdao 115, a national approved rice variety in Heilongjiang Province[J]. China seed industry,2020,05:61−62.
[7]	米红波, 邓婷月, 李毅, 等. 抗性淀粉的消化特性及其在食品中的应用[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2021,40(9):9−15. [MI Hongbo, DENG Tingyue, LI Yi, et al. Digestive characteristics of resistant starch and its application in food[J]. Journal of Food and Biotechnology,2021,40(9):9−15.
[8]	张婧婷. 抗性淀粉的类型及其制备技术研究进展[J]. 现代面粉工业,2021,35(6):26−33. [ZHANG Jingting. Research progress on types and preparation technology of resistant starch[J]. Modern Flour Industry,2021,35(6):26−33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5280.2021.06.007
[9]	YI X, LI C. Main controllers for improving the resistant starch content in cooked white rice[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2022,122:107083. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107083
[10]	GUO Y X, ZHANG W H, SUN Y S, et al. Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation combined with liquid chromatography enables rapid, quantitative, and structurally informative detection of resistant starch[J]. Microchemical Journal,2022,181:107787. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107787
[11]	HE H, CHI C D, XIE F W, et al. Improving the in vitro digestibility of rice starch by thermomechanically assisted complexation with guar gum[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2020,102:105637. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105637
[12]	ENGLYST H N, KINGMAN S M, CUMMINGS J H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions[J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,1992,46:S33−S50.
[13]	BERRY C S. Resistant starch: formation and measurement of starch that survives exhaustive digestion with amylolytic enzymes during the determination of dietary fibre[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,1986,4(4):301−314. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(86)80034-0
[14]	BJORCK I, NYMAN M, PEDERSEN B, et al. On the digestibility of starch in wheat bread-studies in vitro and in vivo[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,1986,4:1−11. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(86)80002-9
[15]	GONI I, GARCIA-DIZ L, MANAS E, et al. Analysis of resistant starch: a method for foods and food products[J]. Food Chemistry,1996,56(4):445−449. doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(95)00222-7
[16]	CHAMP M. Determination of resistant starch in foods and food products: interlaboratory study[J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,1992,46(2):51−62.
[17]	AOAC. Resistant starch in starch and plant materials[S]. AOAC Official Method, 2002.
[18]	ZHANG Z N, ZHANG M Q, ZHANG B, et al. Radio frequency energy regulates the multi-scale structure, digestive and physicochemical properties of rice starch[J]. Food Bioscience,2022,47:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101616
[19]	YOU H, LIANG C, ZHANG O L, et al. Variation of resistant starch content in different processing types and their starch granules properties in rice[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2022,276:118742. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118742
[20]	芦俊峰, 吴建美, 尹幸念, 等. 马铃薯抗性淀粉对T2DM调节作用的研究进展[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2022,36(4):316−319. [LU Junfeng, WU Jianmei, YIN Xingnian, et al. Research progress of potato resistant starch in regulating T2DM[J]. South China Journal of Defense Medicine,2022,36(4):316−319.
[21]	郑宝东, 王琦, 郑亚凤, 等. 抗性淀粉的生物学功效及在食品加工中的应用[J]. 食品科学技术学报,2015,33(5):1−7. [ZHENG Baodong, WANG Qi, ZHENG Yafeng, et al. Biological efficacy of resistant starch and its application in food processing[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2015,33(5):1−7.
[22]	严梅荣. 抗性淀粉测定方法的研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2006(4):251−254. [YAN Meirong. Research progress on determination methods of resistant starch[J]. Food Science,2006(4):251−254. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2006.04.063
[23]	任娜梅, 马蓁, 胡新中. 抗性淀粉体外分析方法的优劣势比较及研究进展[J]. 中国粮油学报,2020,35(11):169−178. [REN Namei, MA Zhen, HU Xinzhong. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of in vitro analysis methods of resistant starch and research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Grain and Oil,2020,35(11):169−178.
[24]	周毅. 浅谈酶促反应方法与影响酶促反应速度的因素[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2014,5(23):71−72. [ZHOU Yi. Brief discussion on enzymatic reaction methods and factors affecting enzymatic reaction speed[J]. China Health Standard Management,2014,5(23):71−72.
[25]	苑晓云, 曹庆芹, 秦岭, 等. 板栗抗性淀粉测定方法的优化[J]. 北京农学院学报,2017,32(3):38−41. [YUAN Xiaoyun, CAO Qingqin, QIN Ling, et al. Optimization of determination method of chestnut resistant starch[J]. Journal of Beijing Agricultural University,2017,32(3):38−41.
[26]	李爱萍, 唐书泽, 张志森, 等. 大米抗性淀粉定量测定方法比较研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2006(1):195−197. [LI Aiping, TANG Shuze, ZHANG Zhisen, et al. Comparative study on quantitative determination methods of rice resistant starch[J]. Food Industry Science and Technology,2006(1):195−197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0306.2006.01.064
[27]	师德强, 吴光, 李检秀, 等. α-淀粉酶Amy7C及其突变体最适pH值的定量预测[J]. 广西科学,2014,21(6):664−670. [SHI Deqiang, WU Guang, LI Jianxiu, et al. α-Quantitative prediction of optimum pH value of amylase Amy 7C and its mutants[J]. Guangxi Science,2014,21(6):664−670. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9164.2014.06.017
[28]	MCCLEARY B V. Measurement of resistant starch and incorporation of resistant starch into dietary fibre measurements[M]. Resistant Starch, 2013: 131-144.
[29]	范媛媛, 马青, 谭梅青, 等. 天然抗性淀粉测定方法的优化[J]. 现代食品科技,2013,29(5):1036−1039,960. [FAN Y Y, MA Q, TAN M Q, et al. Optimization of determination method of natural resistant starch[J]. Modern Food Technology,2013,29(5):1036−1039,960.
[30]	熊春红, 谢明勇, 陈钢. 抗性淀粉研究综述[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2007,19:708−717, 661. [XIONG Chunhong, XIE Mingyong, CHEN Gang. Review on research of resistant starch[J]. Research and Development of Natural Products,2007,19:708−717, 661. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6880.2007.04.040
[31]	周颖, 邹彦平, 姜元荣, 等. 抗性淀粉测定方法探讨及预处理对宜糖米抗性淀粉质量分数的影响[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2017,36(4):416−419. [ZHOU Ying, ZOU Yanping, JIANG Yuanrong, et al. Discussion on the determination method of resistant starch and the effect of pretreatment on the mass fraction of resistant starch in sugar suitable rice[J]. Journal of Food and Biotechnology,2017,36(4):416−419.

[1]	WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Zhenzhen, HU Mengya, DAI Jing, SHA Ruyi, MAO Jianwei. Metabolomics Analysis of Five Types of Wangdu Chili Peppers Based on HPLC and GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(20): 14-22. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024010245
[2]	HUANG Chen, GUO Dejun, YOU Gang, QIN Ningjing. Effect of Different Baking Degrees of Oak on Lychee Brandy Volatility Flavor Based on Electronic Nose and GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(2): 252-259. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023030239
[3]	SUN Xiao-jian, YU Peng-fei, LI Chen-chen, LIU Chang-jin. Analysis of Volatile Components in Vacuum Freeze-dried Toona sinensis by HS-SPME Combined with GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(16): 196-200. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.16.033
[4]	BAI Xue, YANG Shuang, MENG Xin. Effect of Microbial Lipase on the Flavor of Dairy Products by GC-MS Combined with Electronic Nose[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(14): 209-212,218. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.14.039
[5]	YANG Shuang, BAI Xue, MENG Xin. Effect of Chicken Protease on Chicken Flavor by Electronic Nose Combined with GC-MS Detection[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(13): 252-256. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.13.046
[6]	ZHANG Di-ya, XIE Dan-ting, LI Ye. Comparison of volatile components in different parts of beef by electronic nose and GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (21): 241-246. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.21.048
[7]	ZHANG Wen-jie, LIU Cong, YAN Liang, ZHENG Ting-ting, MA Li, ZHAO Miao-miao. Analysis of aroma components in pu-erh tea flower and flower powder by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (16): 257-262. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.16.049
[8]	FUN Qin-bao, CAI Wei-rong, XIE Liang-liang, PAN Hui, CAO Xue, ZENG Heng. Characterisation of volatile components of Lotus leaves by HS-SPME and SDE coupled to GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (15): 253-258. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.15.047
[9]	YANG Ying-chun, WANG Qiang, YANG Jie. Fatty acid composition of Portulaca oleracea seeds oil with GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (14): 147-150. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.14.024
[10]	ZHAO Lin-min, QI Cheng-mei, LIU Xiao-wen, LUO Ying, YUAN Zhi-hui, ZHANG Zu-jiao, WANG Zong-cheng. Analysis of ginger oleoresin in Jiangyong fragrant-ginger by GC-MS[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (06): 78-80. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.06.005

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	刘毕琴，陈骏飞，罗义勇，赵勇，万幸，蔡英丽，唐蓉，史巧，李宏. 发酵蔬菜来源具抑菌活性明串珠菌的筛选及其细菌素基因簇挖掘. 食品工业科技. 2024(11): 142-150 . 本站查看
2.	孙淑倩，徐凤娟，王磊，赵彦翠. 乳酸菌细菌素的研究与应用. 食品科技. 2024(09): 12-18 .
3.	潘果，王云飞，钟忻桐，苏惠，马明瑞，董文龙，李国江，尹柏双. 抗鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的乳酸菌细菌素生物学特性及其抑菌机制初步研究. 饲料研究. 2024(17): 115-120 .
4.	陈淑钧，刘亚楠，翁佩芳，吴祖芳，刘连亮. 乳酸菌接种发酵对腌制雪菜挥发性风味的影响. 中国食品学报. 2024(11): 310-324 .
5.	白霞，崔梦含，朱鹏程，苏雅航，刘爽，王金丽，李东亮，唐俊妮. 3株魏斯氏菌的分离鉴定与生物学特性研究. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2023(09): 59-69 .
6.	李厚强. 具有抑菌作用乳酸菌筛选及其在红酸汤生产中的应用. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2023(11): 164-170 .
7.	焦明，罗玉霞，陈亚男，舒伦，吉林台，金山. 乳酸片球菌R-4细菌素PA-1原核表达及其理化特性. 食品与生物技术学报. 2023(11): 98-105 .
8.	张建飞. 一株产细菌素粪链球菌N9301的分离鉴定及生物学特性研究. 饲料研究. 2022(08): 78-82 .
9.	许晓燕，彭珍，熊世进，肖沐岩，黄涛，熊涛. 乳酸乳球菌乳亚种NCU036018细菌素的分离纯化及其抗菌机制. 食品科学. 2022(16): 209-216 .
10.	秦雅莉，于福田，赵笑颍，沈圆圆，董诗瑜，刘小玲. 发酵乳杆菌SS-31培养基及发酵条件的优化. 食品与生物技术学报. 2022(12): 48-57 .