Identification of 11 Adulterated Meat Species in Cooked Meat Products Using DNA Mini-barcoding Methods Based on Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I Sequence(COI)

LI Jiong; JIANG Hai; WU Qiong; HU Mingjie; ZHAO QIqi; JIN Mengna; QIU Hongyu

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020040288

Volume 42 Issue 2

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(2): 99-104. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020040288

LI Jiong, JIANG Hai, WU Qiong, HU Mingjie, ZHAO QIqi, JIN Mengna, QIU Hongyu. Identification of 11 Adulterated Meat Species in Cooked Meat Products Using DNA Mini-barcoding Methods Based on Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I Sequence(COI)[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(2): 99-104. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020040288

Citation:

PDF (995 KB)

Identification of 11 Adulterated Meat Species in Cooked Meat Products Using DNA Mini-barcoding Methods Based on Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I Sequence(COI)

Hangzhou Institute for Food and Drug Control, Hangzhou 310017, China

More Information

Received Date: April 25, 2020
Available Online: January 20, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

A DNA min-barcoding method with cytochrome C oxidase subunit I sequence(COI)was developed to test 11 adulterated meat species in cooked meat products. DNA extraction and amplification of the mini-barcode region were carried out after samples were treated with ultrasonication and vacuum freeze drying. PCR products were purified with DNA purification kit and analyzed by clone sequencing. The sequencing results were submitted in GenBank using Blast. The primer set COI-A was found to be optimal,showing 100% amplification efficiency in 11 cooked meat species(including pork,beef,mutton,chicken,duck,pigeon meat,horsemeat,ass meat,goose,rabbit meat and rat meat)with optimized PCR procedure. 18 meat adulteration models were founded to test the minimum detected adulteration rate by cheap meat species including pork,chicken,duck,horsemeat,ass meat,and rat meat,and results showed that the minimum detected adulteration rates of beef and mutton added by the 6 cheap species were 5% with chicken was 10%,and the rates of pigeon,goose and rabbit meat were 10%. Using this method to test 30 cooked meat products,18 were found to be adulterated. The method was simple,sensitive and reproducible which would be suitable for the detection of 11 adulterated meat species in cooked meat products.
- DNA mini-barcoding,
- meat,
- cytochromec coxidase subunit I,
- adulteration

FullText(HTML)

References (27)

References

[1]	任君安,黄文胜,葛毅强,等. 肉制品真伪鉴别技术研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(1):247-257.
[2]	王成程,韩国全,张琴,等. 肉及肉制品真伪鉴别技术研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,9(22):5930-5935.
[3]	陈颖,郁蕾,郭升阳. 畜禽肉制品真伪鉴别技术研究进展[J]. 口岸卫生控制,2019,24(3):35-37.
[4]	Kane D E,Hellberg R S. Identification of species in ground meat products sold on the U.S. commercial market using DNA-based methods[J]. Food Control,2016,59:158-163.
[5]	Perestam A T,Hellberg R S. Comparison of real-time PCR and ELISA-based methods for the detection of beef and pork in processed meat products[J]. Food Control,2017,71:346-352.
[6]	Charles A Q,Rebecca T,Rosalee S H. DNA barcoding reveals mislabeling of game meat species on the U.S. commercial market[J]. Food Control,2016,59:389-392.
[7]	Kappel K,Haase I,Käppel C,et al. Species identification in mixed tuna samples with next-generation sequencing targeting two short cytochrome b gene fragments[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,234:212-219.
[8]	Khaksar R,Carlson T,Schaffner D W,et al. Unmasking seafood mislabeling in U.S. markets:DNA barcoding as a unique technology for food authentication and quality control[J]. Food Control,2015,56:71-76.
[9]	Dawn E K,Rosalee S H. Identification of species in ground meat products sold on the U.S. commercial market using DNA-based methods[J]. Food Control,2016,59:158-163.
[10]	李宗梦,赵良娟,赵宏,等. 肉及肉制品动物源性成分鉴别技术研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发,2014,35(18):122-127.
[11]	李宗梦,赵良娟,王永芳,等. 肉及肉制品分子生物学鉴别技术研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2015,6(2):405-409.
[12]	支琴,郭金超,龚强. 肉制品中动物源性成分DNA检测方法的研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,9(16):4204-4211.
[13]	Patterson R M,Spencer T L. Differentiation of raw meat from phylogenically related species by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay[J]. Meat Science,1985,15(3):119-123
[14]	Zvereva E A,Kovalev L I,Ivanov A V,et al.Enzyme immunoassay and proteomic characterization of troponin I as a marker of mammalian muscle compounds in raw meat and some meat products[J]. Meat Science,2015,105:46-52.
[15]	Okuma T,Hellberg R. Identification of meat species in pet foods using a real-time polymerase chain reaction(PCR)assay[J]. Food Control,2015,50:9-17.
[16]	Soares S,Amaral J S,Oliveira M B P P,et al. A SYBR Green real-time PCR assay to detect and quantify pork meat in processed poultry meat products[J]. Meat Science,2013,94(1):115-120.
[17]	Amaral J S,Santos C G,Melo V S,et al. Identification of duck,partridge,pheasant,quail,chicken and turkey meats by species-specific PCR assays to assess the authenticity of traditional game meat Alheira sausages[J]. Food Control,2015,47:190-195.
[18]	Doosti A,Ghasemi D P,Rahimi E. Molecular assay to fraud identification of meat products[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2014,51(1):148-152.
[19]	Sivaraman B,Jeyasekaran G,Shakila B J,et al. PCR-RFLP for authentication of different species of processed snappers using mitochondrial D-loop region by single enzyme[J]. Food Control,2018,90:58-65.
[20]	Quinto C A,Tinoco R,Hellberg R S. DNA barcoding reveals mislabeling of game meat species on the U.S. commercial market[J]. Food Control,2016,59:386-392.
[21]	Nalazek-Rudnicka K,Kłosowska-Chomiczewska I,Wasik A,et al. MRM-MS of marker peptides and their abundance as a tool for authentication of meat species and meat cuts in single-cut meat products[J]. Food Chemisty,2019,283(15):367-374.
[22]	Montowska M,Alexander M R,Tucker G A,et al. Authentication of processed meat products by peptidomic analysis using rapid ambient mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chemistry,2015,187(15):297-304.
[23]	Hebert P D,Cywinska A,Ball S L. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B:Biological Sciences,2003,270(1512):313-321.
[24]	Hajibabaei M,Singer G A C,Hebert P D N,et al. DNA barcoding:How it complements taxonomy,molecular phylogenetics and population genetics[J]. Trends in Genetics,2007,23(4):167-172.
[25]	Sarri C,Stamatis C,Sarafidou T,et al. A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species[J]. Food Control,2014,43:35-41
[26]	Meusnier I,Singer G A C,Landry J F,et al. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis[J]. BMC Genomics,2008,9:214.
[27]	王爽,李永波,马超峰,等. DNA条形码COI序列在常见肉类鉴别中的应用研究[J]. 现代食品科技,2016,32(1):188-193.

[1]	cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(21).
[2]	Cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(14).
[3]	cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(12).
[4]	cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(10).
[5]	cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(6).
[6]	Cover[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(5).

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	杜童申，刘悦，王馨怡，徐远芳，颜金鑫，杨华，杨留明. 基于主成分分析和响应曲面法的植物基肉丸配方优化. 中国粮油学报. 2024(07): 110-119 .
2.	怀欲晓，董鹏程，张一敏，毛衍伟. 人造肉颜色模拟研究现状分析及展望. 食品工业. 2024(09): 270-275 .
3.	张田，黄雨洋，刘琳琳，吕铭守，朱颖，孙冰玉，朱秀清. 多糖对高水分挤压植物蛋白肉结构及品质影响的研究进展. 食品科学. 2024(22): 341-350 .
4.	肖志刚，王海观，江睿生，于小帅，王振国，张俊杰，王哲，高育哲. 羧甲基纤维素钠对挤压豌豆蛋白素肉品质的影响. 食品科学. 2023(08): 118-123 .
5.	高育哲，王海观，苏爽，王振国，时家峰，李妍然，肖志刚. 多糖在挤压制备素肉中的应用现状及趋势. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 163-167 .
6.	戴增辉，韩林娜，路飞，田娟娟，葛世妍，肖志刚. 几种生物保鲜剂对植物基人造肉保鲜效果的影响. 食品工业. 2022(02): 157-162 .
7.	徐翌钦，仲亮，刘畅，钟若愚. 我国人造肉行业发展现状及政策建议. 食品与发酵工业. 2022(05): 309-313 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views PDF downloads Cited by(7)

Science and Technology of Food Industry

Identification of 11 Adulterated Meat Species in Cooked Meat Products Using DNA Mini-barcoding Methods Based on Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I Sequence(COI)