LI Ke, LIAO Maowen, LIN Zixi, et al. Analysis of Quality in Different Weight Grading Kiwifruits Based on Multivariate Statistical Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(21): 285−292. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022110237.
Citation: LI Ke, LIAO Maowen, LIN Zixi, et al. Analysis of Quality in Different Weight Grading Kiwifruits Based on Multivariate Statistical Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(21): 285−292. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022110237.

Analysis of Quality in Different Weight Grading Kiwifruits Based on Multivariate Statistical Method

More Information
  • Received Date: November 23, 2022
  • Available Online: September 04, 2023
  • Present study investigated the difference between the fruit weight and the quality of 'Hongyang' kiwifruit. The 'Hongyang' kiwiruit from 2 orchards collected from Pujiang and Jintang County of Sichuan Provence were classified according to the weight into five grading (<70 g, 70~90 g, 90~110 g, 110~130 g, >130 g). The soluble solid content, titratable acid content, solid acid ratio, hue angle value, sweet and sour taste, VC content of different grades of fruits were analyzed and compared, and partial least squares-discrimination analysis (PLS-DA) was employed to screen the main differential substances in fruits of different weight grading. The results showed that at the same maturity, the fruit size of 'Hongyang' kiwifruit had an impact on the sweet substances such as sugar (SUC) and SSC, sour substances quinic acid (QA) and VC, but had no significant impact on the color, TA, RTT, etc. The content of SUC and SSC increased with the increase of fruit weight, and the characteristic of fruit with a fruit weight greater than 110 g was sweet. While the content of VC and QA decreased with the increase of fruit weight, and when the fruit weight more than 90 g, the content of VC decreased significantly. Although the content of QA decreased with the increase of fruit weight, it had no significant effect on fruit flavor. According to the above results, sweet and sour substances were the main factors affecting the quality of fruits of different weight grading, and the sweet and sour flavor of fruits with larger weight (> 90 g) was better, but the VC content was lower. The research results provide a scientific basis for the revision of fruit grading standards, production management and rational consumption.
  • [1]
    ZHAO Y, WANG P, ZHAN P, et al. Aroma characteristics of cloudy kiwifruit juices treated wiht high hydrostatic pressure and representative thermal processes[J]. Food Research International,2021,139:109841. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109841
    [2]
    LIANG J J, REN Y P, WANG Y, et al. Physicochemical, nutritional, and bioactive properties of pulp and peel from 15 kiwifruit cultivars[J]. Food Bioscience,2021,42(9):109749.
    [3]
    MU L T, LIU H Z, CUI Y J, et al. Mechanized technologies for scaffolding cultivation in the kiwifruit industry: A review[J]. Infromation Processing in Agriculture,2018(4):401−410.
    [4]
    MENG X R, RAO Y X, TAO T, et al. A review of plant breeders rights application and granting for fruit trees in China from 2000 to 2019[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2021,276:109749. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109749
    [5]
    贵州省农业农村厅. DB52T 1503.14-2020. 贵州猕猴桃第十四部分:红阳猕猴桃果品分级技术规程[S]. 贵州省市场监督管理局, 2020[Department of Agriculture of Guizhou Province. DB52T 1503.14-2020. Kiwifruit in Guizhou-part 14: Technique regulations for fruit grading of Hongyang kiwifruit[S]. Adiministration for Market Regulation of Guizhou Province, 2020.

    Department of Agriculture of Guizhou Province. DB52T 1503.14-2020. Kiwifruit in Guizhou-part 14: Technique regulations for fruit grading of Hongyang kiwifruit[S]. Adiministration for Market Regulation of Guizhou Province, 2020.
    [6]
    邵和鸿, 郑万挺, 彭加寅. 基于计算机视觉技术的猕猴桃分级方法[J]. 北京生物医学工程,2009(5):531−533 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3208.2009.05.20.

    SHAO H H, ZHENG W T, PENG J Y. Chinese goosebeery stage division based on computer vision[J]. Beijing Biomedical Engineering,2009(5):531−533. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3208.2009.05.20.
    [7]
    刘忠超, 盖晓华. 基于机器视觉和PLC的猕猴桃分级控制系统设计[J]. 中国农机化学报,2020,41(1):131−135 doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.01.24

    LIU Z C, GAI X H. Design of kiwifruit grading control system based on machine vision and PLC[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization,2020,41(1):131−135. doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.01.24
    [8]
    杨涛, 马京晶, 雷进. 基于表面缺陷识别的猕猴桃分级方法[J]. 湖北农业科学,2021,60(7):145−148 doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.07.029

    YANG T, MA J J, LEI J. Classification method of kiwifruit based on surface defect recognition[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2021,60(7):145−148. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.07.029
    [9]
    袁怀瑜, 朱永清, 李可, 等. 成熟度对“金艳”猕猴桃采后及后熟品质的影响研究[J]. 保鲜与加工,2020,20(3):34−40 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2020.03.006

    YUAN H Y, ZHU Y Q, LI K, et al. Study on postharvest and ripening quality of ‘Jinyan’ kiwifruit with different maturation[J]. Storage and Process,2020,20(3):34−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2020.03.006
    [10]
    袁沙, 李华佳, 朱永清, 等. ‘红阳’猕猴桃乙烯催熟特性[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(9):244−251 doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201809037

    YUAN S, LI H J, ZHU Y Q, et al. Ripening characteristics of ‘Hongyang’ kiwifruits following postharvest ethylene treatment[J]. Food Science,2018,39(9):244−251. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201809037
    [11]
    MARGARET G H S, JENNY A H, ELSETH A M, et al. Role of fruit firmness in the sensory evaluation of kiwifruit ( Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward)[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1989,47(4):417−433. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740470404
    [12]
    董金磊, 郭文川. 采后猕猴桃可溶性固形物含量的高光谱无损检测[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(16):101−106 doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201516018

    DONG J L, GUO W C. Nondestructive detection of soluble content of postharvest kiwifruits based on hyperspectral imaging technology[J]. Food Science,2015,36(16):101−106. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201516018
    [13]
    郑丽静, 聂继云, 闫震. 糖酸组分及其对水果风味的影响研究进展[J]. 果树学报,2015,32(2):304−312 doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20140271

    ZHENG L J, NIE J Y, YAN Z. Advances in research on sugars, organic acids and their effects on taste of fruits[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2015,32(2):304−312. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20140271
    [14]
    刘科鹏, 黄春辉, 冷建华, 等. 金魁猕猴桃果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 果树学报,2012,29 (5):867−871

    LIU K P, HUANG C H, LENG J H, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of ‘Jinkui’ kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2012,29(5):867−871.
    [15]
    曲雪艳, 郎彬彬, 钟敏, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(1):92−96 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060025

    QÜ X Y, LANG B B, ZHONG M, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of Actinidia criantha[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2016,32(1):92−96. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060025
    [16]
    赵思东, 汪明, 杨谷良, 等. 12个猕猴桃品种引种栽培果实品质评价研究[J]. 农业现代化研究,2002,23(6):455−457 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0275.2002.06.014

    ZHAO S D, WANG M, YANG G L, et al. Assessment of fruit quality of twelve kiwifruit varieties introduced and planted in China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization,2002,23(6):455−457. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0275.2002.06.014
    [17]
    王世芳, 韩平, 崔广禄, 等. Spxy算法的西瓜可溶性固形物近红外光谱检测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,2019,39(3):738−742

    WANG S F, HAN P, CUI G L, et al. The NIR detection research of souble solid content in watermelon based on SPXY algorithm[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2019,39(3):738−742.
    [18]
    JIN F, ZHANG F, YUE X, et al. Correlation between leaf size and fruit quality of kiwi [J]. Agricultural Science and Technology (English),2016,17(11) :2469−2488.
    [19]
    任艳会. 果实特征和后熟处理对红阳猕猴桃内在品质的影响[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2012

    REN Y H. The effect of fruit characters and ripening process on the internal quality of ‘Hongyang’ kiwifruit[D]. Ya’an:Sichuan Agriculture University, 2012.
    [20]
    金方伦, 岳宣, 黎明, 等. 后熟方法对猕猴桃果实后熟期品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学,2016,55(14):3712−3715 doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2016.14.043

    FANG J L, YUE X, LI M, et al. Effect of after-ripening period on kiwi fruit quality in different ripe methods[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2016,55(14):3712−3715. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2016.14.043
    [21]
    牛英, 陈传武, 刘冰浩, 等. 果实大小与留树保鲜时间对沙糖桔果实浮皮和糖酸变化的影响[J]. 中国南方果树,2019,48(6):1−6 doi: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20190498

    NIU Y, CHEN C W, LIU Y H, et al. Effects of fruit size and preservation time on the changes of peel and sugar and acid content of Satsuma orange fruit[J]. South China Fruit,2019,48(6):1−6. doi: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20190498
    [22]
    JIA H J, MIZUGUCHI K, OKAMOTO G. Effect of fruit size on the quality of white-fleshed peach cultivars[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2003,20(6):439−444.
    [23]
    庄林歆, 潘葳, 林晓姿, 等. 枇杷果实成熟和贮藏过程中有机酸的代谢[J]. 果树学报,2005,20(1):23−26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2005.01.006

    ZHUANG L X, PAN W, LIN X Z, et al. Organic acids metabolism of loquat fruit during maturity and stroage[J]. Journal of Fruit Science,2005,20(1):23−26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2005.01.006
    [24]
    刘星辉, 陈立松, 陈发兴. 果实有机酸代谢研究进展[J]. 果树学报,2005,22(5):526−531 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2005.05.020

    LIU X H, CHEN L S, CHEN F X. Research progress in organic acid metabolism of fruit[J]. South China Fruit,2005,22(5):526−531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2005.05.020
    [25]
    王刚, 王涛, 潘德林, 等. 不同品种猕猴桃果实有机酸组分及含量分析[J]. 农学学报,2017,7(12):81−84 doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17050014

    WANG G, WANG T, PAN D L, et al. The components and contents of organic acid in kiwifruit fruits from different cultivars[J]. Journal of Agriculture,2017,7(12):81−84. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17050014
    [26]
    廖光联, 李西时, 陈璐, 等. 猕猴桃果实不同部位间果实品质的差异性分析[J]. 北方园艺,2019(6):34−42 doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20182827

    LIAO G L, LI X S, CHEN L, et al. Difference analysis on fruit quality among different parts of kiwifruit[J]. Northern Horticulture,2019(6):34−42. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20182827
    [27]
    梁俊, 郭燕, 刘玉莲, 等. 不同品种苹果果实中糖酸组成与含量分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2011,39(10):163−170

    LIANG J, GUO Y, LIU Y L, et al. Analysis of contents and constituents of sugar and organic acid in different apple cultivars[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Nat Sci Ed),2011,39(10):163−170.
    [28]
    韩攀, 时小东, 覃思颖, 等. 保鲜方式和果实大小对油梨果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究,2021,39(3):251−256, 264 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2021.03.029

    LHAN P, SHI X D, XUN T Y, et al. Effects of preservation method and fruit size on quality of avocado fruit[J]. Nonwood Forest Research,2021,39(3):251−256, 264. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2021.03.029
    [29]
    于年文, 李俊才, 王家珍, 等. 南果梨果实大小与内在品质的关系[J]. 河北果树,2009(4):4 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9402.2009.04.003

    YU N W, LI J C, WANG J Z, et al. Relationship between fruit size and internal quality of Nanguo pear[J]. Hebei Fruits,2009(4):4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9402.2009.04.003
    [30]
    王玮, 何宜恒, 李桦, 等. CPPU 处理对‘华优’猕猴桃品质及耐贮性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(6):261−266 doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606047

    WANG W, HE Y H, LI H, et al. Effect of 1-(2-choropyridin-4-yl)-3-phenylurea (CPPU) treatment on postharvest fruit quality and storability in ‘Huayou’ kiwifruit[J]. Food Science,2016,37(6):261−266. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606047
    [31]
    郭叶, 王亚萍, 费学谦, 等. 不同浓度CPPU处理对“徐香”猕猴桃贮藏生理和品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2012,33(20):324−327, 357

    GUO Y, WANG Y P, FEI X Q, et al. Effect of different concentrations of CPPU on physiological and nutritional quality of ‘Xuxiang’ kiwifruit[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2012,33(20):324−327, 357.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 赵磊,丁雪,孙艳杰,马金刚,孟军,姜大成,昝珂,杨铭. 响应面优化提取新鲜沙棘果中异鼠李素及其两性聚合物结构修饰. 中国药物评价. 2024(02): 141-147 .
    2. 刘帝言,司富春. 中医药调节细胞焦亡治疗桥本甲状腺炎的研究进展. 中医学报. 2024(08): 1663-1669 .
    3. 赵磊,丁雪,孙艳杰,马金刚,孟军,姜大成,马彧,昝珂. 柱前衍生-气相色谱法测定沙棘中脂肪酸的含量. 特产研究. 2024(04): 116-127 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (95) PDF downloads (12) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return