Effects of Different Feeding Patterns on Muscle Fiber Type Composition and Mutton Quality of Sunit Sheep

SUN Bing; HOU Yanru; XU Liyuan; WANG Chenlei; JIN Ye; ZHAO Lihua; TU Ya; SU Lin

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090100

Volume 43 Issue 11

May 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2022 > 43(11): 96-103. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090100

SUN Bing, HOU Yanru, XU Liyuan, et al. Effects of Different Feeding Patterns on Muscle Fiber Type Composition and Mutton Quality of Sunit Sheep[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(11): 96−103. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090100.

Citation:

PDF (4543 KB)

Effects of Different Feeding Patterns on Muscle Fiber Type Composition and Mutton Quality of Sunit Sheep

1.
College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
2.
School of Food and Wine, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
3.
Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Science and Technology Bureau, Wulate Middle Banner 015300, China

More Information

Received Date: September 07, 2021
Accepted Date: March 10, 2022
Available Online: March 26, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The study of feeding regimens (pasture, grazing supplementary and confinement) on slaughter performance, meat quality in the longissimus dorsi muscle of Sunit sheep were determined. Afterwards, quantitative classification of muscle fiber types was conducted by ATPase histochemical staining and real-time fluorescence quantitative quantification to explore the difference of feeding patterns on types composition of muscle fiber , in order to explore the internal reasons for the difference of meat quality in different feeding methods. The experimental results indicated that the slaughter performance indexes such as total weight gain, net meat weight, net meat rate, slaughter rate and meat production rate, and carcass quality indexes such as backfat thickness and carcass weight of the the grazing supplementary and confinement feeding patterns were increased remarkably than those of the pasture pattern (P < 0.05), the ratio of bone to meat of the pasture pattern was significantly higher than that in confinement and grazing supplementary feeding patterns (P < 0.05). The pH_{24 h} of the confinement pattern was remarkable lower than that of the pasture and grazing supplementary feeding patterns (P < 0.05), and the shear force of the pasture pattern was remarkable lower than that of the confinement pattern (P < 0.05). The diameter and area proportion of typeⅡb muscle fiber in pasture pattern and grazing supplementary feeding pattern were significantly higher than those in confinement pattern (P < 0.05), and the gene expression of MyHCⅡb mRNA was significantly lowr than that in confinement pattern (P < 0.05). The diameter, cross section area of typeⅠandⅡa muscle fibers, the enzyme activity of LDH in the confinement pattern were significantly elevated than those in the pasture pattern (P < 0.05), the number and area percentage of Ⅱa, the gene expression of MyHCⅠmRNA, the muscle fiber density and the enzyme activity of MDH in the confinement pattern were markedly lower than those in the grazing supplementary feeding and pasture pattern (P<0.05), the genes expression level of MyHCⅡx, MyHCⅡa mRNA and the enzyme activity of SDH in confinement pattern were reduced significantly than those in pasture pattern (P < 0.05). Therefore, different feeding regimens of Sunit sheep have their own advantages, and the slaughter performance and carcass quality of Sunit sheep under confinement and grazing supplementary feeding are better. Pasture and grazing supplementary feeding have better meat quality due to their ability to enhance muscle oxidative metabolism and higher proportion of oxidized muscle fibers.
- feeding regimens,
- Sunit sheep,
- slaughter performance,
- muscle fiber,
- meat quality

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	闫祥林. 新疆多浪羊肉质特性及品质控制研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2018. YAN X L. Study on meat characteristics and quality control of Xinjiang Duolang sheep[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018.
[2]	张艳梅, 白晨, 敖长金, 等. 不同饲养方式对肉羊胴体及肉品质影响的研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2021,57(7):75−86. [ZHANG Y M, BAl C, AO C J, et al. Research progress on the effect of grazing system on carcass and meat quality of meat sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2021,57(7):75−86.
[3]	尹靖东. 动物肌肉生物学与肉品科学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011. YIN J D. Animal muscle biology and meat quality[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2011.
[4]	HAMDI H, MAJDOUB-M L, PICARD B, et al. Carcass traits, contractile muscle properties and meat quality of grazing and feedlot Barbarine lamb receiving or not olive cake[J]. Small Ruminant Res,2016,145:85−93. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.028
[5]	尹丽卿. 不同饲养方式下苏尼特羊肌纤维特性和MyHC基因对肉质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2016. YIN L Q. The effect of muscle fiber characteristics and MyHC gene on meat quality of Sunit sheep in different feeding conditions[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2016.
[6]	努孜古丽·图尔荪. 吐鲁番黑羊肌纤维特性与肌肉嫩度的相关性研究[C]. 中国畜牧兽医学会养羊学分会. 2015年全国养羊生产与学术研讨会论文集. 中国畜牧兽医学会养羊学分会, 2015: 136. NU Z G L. Study on the correlation between muscle fiber characteristics and muscle tenderness of Turpan black sheep[C]. Sheep Breeding Branch of Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society. Proceedings of the 2015 National Sheep Production and Academic Symposium. Sheep Breeding Branch of Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society, 2015: 136.
[7]	李虹, 巴彩凤, 苏玉虹. 大白猪不同部位肌肉肌纤维表达特点[J]. 畜牧与兽医,2007(11):21−24. [LI H, BA C F, SU Y H. Type of muscle fibers in different muscle tissues of Large White pigs[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine,2007(11):21−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-5130.2007.11.007
[8]	侯普馨, 侯艳茹, 白艳苹, 等. 日粮添加亚麻籽对苏尼特羊肌纤维特性及肉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(11):36−42. [HOU P X, HOU Y R, BAI Y P, et al. Effect of dietary linseed supplementation on muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality of Sunit sheep[J]. Food Science,2020,41(11):36−42. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190625-319
[9]	HWANG Y H, KIM G D, JEONG J Y, et al. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality traits of highlymar bled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers[J]. Meat Science,2010,86(2):456−461. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.034
[10]	BROOKE M H, KAISER K K. Three "myosin adenosine triphosphatase" systems: The nature of their phlability and sulfhydryl dependence[J]. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry,1970,18(9):670−672.
[11]	A CERISUELO, R SALA, G NIRNBERG, et al. How many muscle samples are required to obtain reliable estimations of muscle fibrecharacteristics from pig longissimus muscle?[J]. Meat Science,2007,76(3):583−587. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.008
[12]	苏琳. 巴美肉羊肌纤维特性、糖酵解潜力对羊肉品质的影响和MyHC表达量分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2015. SU L. Effects of muscle fibre characteristics, glycolytic potential on meat quality and myosin heavy chain expression of Bamei sheep[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2015.
[13]	BROCKS L, KLONT R E, BUIST W, et al. The effects of selection of pigs on growth rate vs. leanness on histochemical characteristics of different muscles[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2000,78(5):1247−1254. doi: 10.2527/2000.7851247x
[14]	马晓冰. 饲养方式对宰后苏尼特羊肉 AMPK、糖酵解及肉品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2016. MA X B. The effect of feeding methods on AMPK, glycolysis and meat quality of postmortem Sunit sheep[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2016.
[15]	解进, 闫素梅, 赵育国, 等. 不同育肥方式对呼伦贝尔羔羊育肥性能及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2016(6):24−28. [XIE J, YAN S M, ZHAO Y G, et al. Effects of different fattening methods on fattening and slaughter performance of Hulun Buir Lambs[J]. Feed Research,2016(6):24−28.
[16]	TURNER K E, BELESKY D P, ZAJAC A M, et al. Performance and blood parameters when lambs and meat-goat kids were finished on pasture with and without whole cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) supplementation[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2015,70(3):451−464. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12121
[17]	鲍宇红, 冯柯, 普布卓玛, 等. 不同饲养方式对西藏岗巴羊肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2020,56(4):178−183. [BAO Y H, FENG K, PU B J M, et al. Effects of different feeding methods on the quality of Gamba mutton in Xizang[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry,2020,56(4):178−183.
[18]	王宏博, 梁春年, 丁学智, 等. 夏季放牧补饲对欧拉型藏羊羔羊育肥效果的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2014,42(25):8619−8622. [WANG H B, LIANG C N, DING X Z, et al. Study on the fattening performance of oula tibetan sheep lamb with grazing and supplementary feeding in summer[J]. Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(25):8619−8622. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.25.054
[19]	王敏. 放牧与舍饲对肉牛生产性能和肉品质影响的比较研究[D]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2020. WANG M. A comparative study on the effects of grazing and stallfeeding on the performance and meat quality of beef cattle supplementary feeding in summer[D]. JI lin: Jilin University, 2020.
[20]	李文博. 饲养方式对苏尼特羊宰后肌原纤维蛋白与肉品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. LI W B. Effects of feeding regimen on myofibrillar protein and meat quality after Sunit sheep slaughter[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020.
[21]	LI M, LI X, XIN J, et al. Effects of protein phosphorylation on color stability of ground meat[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,219:304−310. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.151
[22]	罗玉龙. 放牧与舍饲条件下苏尼特羊肉风味差异及形成机制研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019. LUO Y L. Difference of meat flavor in Sunit lamb (concentrated vs grazing) and primary formation mechanism[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019: 48−58.
[23]	DE B G, MCGRATH S R, HOLMAN B W B, et al. The effect of forage type on lamb carcass traits, meat quality and sensory traits[J]. Meat Sci,2016,119:95−101. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.030
[24]	温琦. 放牧补饲条件下绒山羊羯羔与母羔育肥性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的比较研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019. WEN Q. Study on comparison of fattening performance and slaughter performance and meat quality between cashmere castrated lambsand ewe lambs under the condition of grazing supplementary feeding[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019.
[25]	侯艳茹, 苏琳, 靳烨, 等. 饲养方式对苏尼特羊肌纤维组成和肉品质的影响及其调控机理[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(7):83−89. [HOU Y R, SU L, JIN Y, et al. Effect of feeding regimens on muscle fiber type composition and meat quality of sunit sheep and underlying regulatory mechanism[J]. Food Science,2021,42(7):83−89. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200321-312
[26]	侯普馨. 饲养方式对苏尼特羊肌纤维特性及肉品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. HOU P X. Effects of feeding regimens on muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality of Sunit sheep[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020.
[27]	王勇峰, 丰永红, 万红兵, 等. 新疆褐牛不同部位牛肉肌纤维类型及品质差异研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,39(6):19−24. [WANG Y F, FENG Y H, WANG H B, et al. Study on the difference of muscle fiber types and quality in different parts of Xinjiang brown cattle[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2018,39(6):19−24.
[28]	王莉. 牦牛肉肌纤维类型组成及其代谢酶活力差异对宰后肉嫩度的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016. WANG L. The effect of muscle fiber types and their differences in metabolic enzymes activity on postmortem tenderness of yak meat[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2016.
[29]	方程. 隆林黄牛、荷斯坦牛和西林水牛的肉质、肌纤维和酶活性差异的研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2018. FANG C. Study on the differences of meat quality, muscle fiber and enzyme activity of longlin cattle, holstein cattle and xilin buffalo[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2018.
[30]	王松, 刘刚, 童涛, 等. 有氧耐力训练对不同周龄大鼠骨骼肌代谢酶的影响[J]. 山东体育学院学报,2008(4):60−63. [WANG S, LIU G, TONG T, et al. Effects of aerobic training on skeletal muscle metabolic enzymes in different aging rats[J]. Journal of Shandong Institute of Physical Education,2008(4):60−63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2076.2008.04.018

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	张彪，杨晓宽. 纳豆菌发酵板栗渣工艺优化及其多糖的抗氧化性. 食品研究与开发. 2025(03): 160-166 .
2.	胡鑫，杨若菊，吴丁兴，朱雪峰，吴小平，傅俊生. 一株血红栓孔菌的多糖抗氧化及抗Huh7肝癌细胞的活性. 菌物学报. 2023(03): 793-807 .
3.	舒逸凡，宋克超，徐洁，吴小军，曾晓雄. 黑木耳发酵多糖酸奶的研制与工艺优化. 食品工业. 2023(04): 41-45 .
4.	刘迎欣，伊娟娟，邵怡雯，崔燕，李雪，王金柱，郝利民，鲁吉珂. 布拉氏酵母发酵山药多糖的分离鉴定与体外生物活性探究. 食品工业科技. 2023(14): 154-162 . 本站查看
5.	罗伟，杨立军，崔晨旭，王玉娇，陈琼，王锐丽，叶润. 内生菌协同发酵对半夏多糖及其生物活性的影响. 中南农业科技. 2023(08): 52-56+61 .
6.	杨立军，花娇娇，崔晨旭，贾艳娇，陈琼，赫丁轩. 一株高产胞外多糖半夏内生真菌的鉴定、发酵条件优化及生物活性测定. 中国酿造. 2023(11): 109-114 .