Qualitative Comparative Analysis on Influencing Factors of the Residents ’ Satisfaction Degree ——A Case Study of Food Safety Founding City

CHEN Zhiliang; SUN Lu; PAN Leiming

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021040104

Volume 42 Issue 24

Dec. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(24): 216-223. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021040104

CHEN Zhiliang, SUN Lu, PAN Leiming. Qualitative Comparative Analysis on Influencing Factors of the Residents ’ Satisfaction Degree ——A Case Study of Food Safety Founding City[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(24): 216−223. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021040104.

Citation:

PDF (2315 KB)

Qualitative Comparative Analysis on Influencing Factors of the Residents ’ Satisfaction Degree ——A Case Study of Food Safety Founding City

1.
Business School of Zhejiang Pharmaceutical College, Ningbo 315100, China
2.
State Administration for Market Regulation Development Research Center, Beijing 100088, China
3.
Zhejiang Gongzheng Testing Center Company Limited, Hangzhou 310009, China

More Information

Received Date: April 12, 2021
Available Online: October 18, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Food safety city is an important vehicle to promote the level of food safety and the satisfaction degree for local government. The article made use of the qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the mechanism of multiple factors in the eleven food safety founding cities of Zhejiang province. The results showed that qualitative comparative analysis on the feasibility of establishing public satisfaction promotion research field in food safety city. The public's evaluation of government supervision was the necessary condition to affect the satisfaction degree. The five conditional variables of food safety publicity, qualified rate of food sampling, good water quality index, per capita GDP and tobacco and alcohol consumption price index interact to improve the satisfaction degree. The low per capita GDP, strong publicity on food safety or good water could improve the satisfaction degree. It was found that the impact factors of the food safe founding city were positively correlated with the satisfaction degree. Every time the creation factor increased by 1 standard unit, the public satisfaction with food safety would increase by 0.687 units. The conditional configuration and result analysis showed that there were three paths to upgrade the satisfaction degree of propaganda and developments, resource endowment and low economic driven type.
- qualitative comparative analysis,
- food safety,
- founding city,
- satisfaction degree,
- upgrade path

FullText(HTML)

References (42)

References

[1]	毛敏明, 周骏贵, 高瑞峰, 等. 创建国家食品安全示范城市的重要价值[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,16(9):4200−4203. [MAO M M, ZHOU J G, GAO R F, et al. The important value of building a national food safety demonstration city[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality,2018,16(9):4200−4203.
[2]	陈志良, 黎海涛. 浙江省食品安全创建城市公众满意度研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(1):370−375. [CHEN Z L, LI H T. Study on the satisfaction of the residents in the food safety founding city of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality,2021,12(1):370−375.
[3]	LIU P, MA L. Food scandals, media exposure, and citizens’ safety concerns: A multilevel analysis across Chinese cities[J]. Food Policy,2016(63):102−111.
[4]	LIU P. The missing links between regulatory resources and risk concerns: Evidence from the case of food safety in China[R]. Regulation and Governance, 2017.
[5]	WANG H, MA L. Media coverage and citizens’ perceptions of food safety in urban China[R]. China Policy Journal, 2018.
[6]	黄宗敏, 胡振, 罗红叶, 等. 上海市静安区、松江区公众食品安全满意度调查[J]. 上海预防医学,2018,30(6):430−433. [HUANG Z M, HU Z, LUO H Y, et al. Survey on public satisfaction with food safety in Jing’an district and Songjiang district of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Preventive Medicine,2018,30(6):430−433.
[7]	纪杰. 食品安全满意度影响因素分析及监管路径选择—基于重庆的问卷调查城乡公众食品安全满意度统计分析[J]. 中国行政管理,2014,349(7):97−100. [JI J. Analysis on the influencing of food safety satisfaction and supervision path choice: Based on questionnaire survey in Chongqing[J]. China Public Administration,2014,349(7):97−100. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2014.07.20
[8]	杨卫, 万广珠. 我国食品安全监管效率研究—基于超效率DEA模型和Malmquist指数分析[J]. 食品工业,2018,39(10):260−264. [YANG W, WAN G Z. Study on the efficiency of food safety supervision in China: Analysis based on super efficiency DEA model and Malmquist index[J]. Food Industry,2018,39(10):260−264.
[9]	王英, 唐云. 评比表彰与城市治理—来自国家环境保护模范城市创建的经验证据[J]. 治理研究,2020,195(5):38−39. [WANG Y, TANG Y. Evaluation, commendation and urban governance—Empirical evidence from the establishment of national environmental protection model city[J]. Governance Research,2020,195(5):38−39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9092.2020.05.006
[10]	马亮, 王洪川. 示范城市创建与食品安全感: 基于自然实验的政策评估[J]. 南京社会科学,2018(9):70−75,91. [MA L, WANG H C. Policy pilot and food safety perception: A policy evaluation based on natural experiments[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing,2018(9):70−75,91.
[11]	BAER W, CONOVER C J, COOK C, et al. Analysis of federally funded demonstration projects: Supporting case studies[R]. Rand Corporation, 1976.
[12]	MARSHALL J G. Diffusion of innovation theory and end user searching[J]. Library and Information Science Research,1990,6(1):55−69.
[13]	DDAMANPOUR F, SCHNEIDER M. Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008,19(3):495−522.
[14]	Machy S M, BROWN M A. Demonstrations as a policy instrument with energy technology examples[J]. Science Communication,1990,11(3):219−236.
[15]	FRISHAMMAR J, SODERHOLM P, BOCKSTROM K, et al. The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technological development: Synthesis and directions for future research[J]. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,2015,27(1):1−18. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.943715
[16]	陈宇, 闫倩倩. “中国式”政策试点结果差异的影响因素研究—基于30个案例的多值定性比较分析[J]. 北京社会科学,2019,42(6):42−52. [CHEN Y, YAN Q Q. Study on the influencing factors of the differences in policy pilot results: Multi-value qualitative comparative analysis based on 30 cases[J]. Beijing Social Sciences,2019,42(6):42−52.
[17]	刘鹏, 张伊静. 中国式政策示范效果及其影响因素—基于两个示范城市建设案例的比较研究[J]. 行政论坛,2020,162(6):65−73. [LIU P, ZHANG Y J. The demonstration effect of Chinese style policy and its influencing factors—A comparative study based on two demonstration city construction cases[J]. Administrative Tribune,2020,162(6):65−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2020.06.010
[18]	BENNETT A, ELMAN C. Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods[J]. Annual Review of Political Science,2006,9(1):455−476. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
[19]	杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界,2017(6):155−167. [DU Y Z, JIA L D. Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis(QCA): A new way of management research[J]. Management World,2017(6):155−167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2017.06.011
[20]	孙健, 王保玲. 北京高端金融人才发展环境满意度及其影响因素分析—基于北京市490位高端金融人才的调查数据[J]. 北京社会科学,2019(7):27−37. [SUN J, WANG B L. Beijing's development environment satisfaction and its influencing factors—Based on the survey of 490 high-end financial talents in Beijing[J]. Beijing Social Sciences,2019(7):27−37.
[21]	崔慧姝, 周望. 城市治理的中国之道: 基于“创城”机制的一项分析[J]. 学习论坛,2018,404(8):59−64. [CUI H S, ZHOU W. China’s approach to urban governance: An analysis based on the mechanism of “creating cities”[J]. Learning Forum,2018,404(8):59−64.
[22]	石大千, 胡可, 陈佳. 城市文明是否推动了企业高质量发展?—基于环境规制与交易成本视角[J]. 产业经济研究,2019,103(6):27−38. [SHI D Q, HU K, CHEN J. Does urban civilization promote the high-quality development of enterprises?—Based on the perspective of environmental regulation and transaction costs[J]. Industrial Economics Research,2019,103(6):27−38.
[23]	张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报,2019,16(9):1312−1323. [ZHANG M, DU Y Z. Application of QCA method in organization and management research: Positioning, strategy and direction[J]. Chinese Journal of Management,2019,16(9):1312−1323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005
[24]	姚山季, 胡江涛. 食品安全治理领域的研究方法应用探索—基于我国21个地区样本的定性比较分析[J]. 中国调味品,2020,45(8):162−166. [YAO S J, HU J T. Exploration on the application of research methods in the field of food safety governance—Based on QCA of samples from 21 regions in China[J]. China Condiment,2020,45(8):162−166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2020.08.036
[25]	牛哲, 童毛弟, 陈庭强, 等. 基于知识图谱的消费者食品安全满意度研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,39(24):227−233. [NIU Z, TONG M D, CHEN T Q, et al. Research progress on consumer food safety satisfaction based on knowledge graph[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2018,39(24):227−233.
[26]	RIHOUX B, RAGIN C C. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis(QCA) and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009.
[27]	徐国冲, 李威瑢. 食品安全事件的影响因素及治理路径—基于REASON模型的QCA分析[J]. 管理学刊,2021,34(4):109−126. [XU G C, LI W R. Influencing factors and governance paths of food safety accidents: QCA analysis based on REASON model[J]. Journal of Management,2021,34(4):109−126.
[28]	李太平. 基于分类抽样原理的我国食品安全状况定量评价研究[J]. 农业经济问题,2020(9):132−142. [LI T P. Study on China’s food safety situation evaluation with classification random sampling theory[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy,2020(9):132−142.
[29]	张阿兰, 袁琴. 食品安全监管公众满意度影响因素实证研究[J]. 食品工业,2020,41(1):250−254. [ZHANG A L, YUAN Q. Empirical research on influencing factors of public satisfaction with food safety supervision[J]. Food Industry,2020,41(1):250−254.
[30]	许雅欣, 宋明翰, 朱毅. 中国居民食品安全满意度影响因素分析[J]. 食品工业,2018,39(9):257−261. [XU Y X, SONG M H, ZHU Y. Analysis of the factors affecting the food safety satisfaction[J]. Food Industry,2018,39(9):257−261.
[31]	JENSON I, LEITH P, DOYLE R, et al. Testing innovation systems theory using qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research,2016,69(4):1283−1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.093
[32]	RAGIN C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
[33]	周子凝. 台州市2020年度食品安全满意度创历史新高[N]. 台州日报, 2021-1-31(5). ZHOU Z N. Taizhou city reach a new record about the satisfaction degree of food safety in 2020[N]. Taizhou Daily, 2021-1-31(5).
[34]	陈志良. 食品安全公众满意度测评及监管路径选择[J]. 现代商贸工业,2019,40(30):63−64. [CHEN Z L. Evaluation of public satisfaction with food safety and choice of regulatory path[J]. Modern Business Industry,2019,40(30):63−64.
[35]	陈志良, 陈琳, 潘欣, 等. 基于因子分析法的公众食品安全满意度——以浙江省第三批食品安全创建县(市、区)为例[J]. 食品工业,2021,42(3):338−341. [CHEN Z L, CHEN L, PAN X, et al. Food safety satisfaction of the residents based on factor analysis—A case of the third batch of food safety founding county in Zhejiang Province[J]. Food Industry,2021,42(3):338−341.
[36]	生吉萍, 宿文凡, 罗云波. 食品流通领域风险分析与风险控制[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(19):240−243. [SHENG J P, SU W F, LUO Y B. Risk analysis and control in the field of food circulation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2020,41(19):240−243.
[37]	杨鸿雁, 周芬芬, 田英杰. 基于关联规则的消费者食品安全满意度研究[J]. 管理评论,2020,32(4):286−297. [YANG H Y, ZHOU F F, TIAN Y J. Study on consumers food safety satisfaction based on association rules[J]. Management Review,2020,32(4):286−297.
[38]	陈煦江, 蒋夏霞, 高露. 食品安全治理的国外研究新进展及对我国的启示[J]. 食品工业科技,2013,34(14):49−53. [CHEN X J, JIANG X X, GAO L. New research progress of food safety administration overseas and reference suggestions for China’s food safety management[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2013,34(14):49−53.
[39]	贺彩虹, 周子哲, 李德胜, 等. 中欧食品安全监管体系比较研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(19):216−220, 225. [HE C H, ZHOU Z Z, LI D S, et al. Comparative study on China EU food safety supervision system[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019,40(19):216−220, 225.
[40]	赵文秀, 赵勇, 丛键. 应急管理视角下食品安全风险交流的应用研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(17):196−201, 211. [ZHAO W X, ZHAO Y, CONG J. Practical application of food safety risk communication from the perspective of emergency management[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019,40(17):196−201, 211.
[41]	李美英, 吴彩艳, 周博雅, 等. 加拿大食品检查员制度体系对完善我国职业化食品检查员队伍建设的启示[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,4l(16):207−213, 251. [LI M Y, WU C Y, ZHOU B Y, et al. Enlightemnent from Canadian food inspector system to the construction of food inspection team in China[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2020,4l(16):207−213, 251.
[42]	王育红, 林峰, 仝静, 等. 基于灰色关联模型的食品安全监管满意度影响因素分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2013,34(6):49−52. [WANG Y H, LIN F, TONG J, et al. Analysis of impact factors about satisfaction degree for food safety supervision based on grey relational model[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2013,34(6):49−52.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	贾鑫，高鹏，周瑞，徐攀，王丹，黄敏，孟爱莲，张雁君，吴舸洋. 基于纯培养法结合高通量测序技术解析胀袋辐照凤爪中的微生物多样性. 食品与发酵工业. 2024(12): 135-141 .
2.	钟娟，何静，陈晓珍，杨涛. 高通量测序技术分析浓香型白酒酒糟自然堆积发酵过程的微生物多样性. 酿酒. 2023(06): 50-56 .
3.	姚晓红，孙宏，周航海，汤江武，吴逸飞，王新，沈琦. 发酵时间对西兰花茎叶发酵饲料的营养成分和发酵品质及微生物群落多样性的影响. 中国畜牧杂志. 2023(11): 259-264 .
4.	李思雨，杜贺超，包佳亮，姚宏亮，蒋加进. 贵州腌鱼微生物多样性和益生特性分析. 农产品加工. 2023(24): 66-71 .
5.	罗爱国，郗鑫瑞，郑同庆，杨兆艳，田艳花，马晓丽，赵红梅. 基于Illumina MiSeq高通量测序分析清香型白酒酒糟微生物群落多样性. 中国酿造. 2022(01): 98-102 .
6.	刘都，张利鹏. 食品安全中微生物的危害及防治策略分析. 食品安全导刊. 2022(22): 13-15 .
7.	罗爱国，王家彦，郝建伟，郭春燕，时晓丽，杨博雯，赵红梅. 山西老陈醋丟糟微生物群落多样性分析. 中国调味品. 2022(09): 53-58 .
8.	孙胜敏，张宇鑫，王一村，周莉莉，高静静，李娜，才美佳，赵彤彤. 番茄酱中关键致腐菌快速筛选方法的建立. 中国果菜. 2022(08): 64-69 .
9.	田存章，贺新平，万嘉欣，姬国杰，周红伟，崔靖，吴文龙. 怀菊不同部位内生细菌多样性分析. 农业与技术. 2021(17): 31-33 .