GAO Tao, LUO Huangyang, WU Ren, et al. Application of Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Method in Food Sensory Evaluation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(18): 300−307. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020120230.
Citation: GAO Tao, LUO Huangyang, WU Ren, et al. Application of Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Method in Food Sensory Evaluation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(18): 300−307. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020120230.

Application of Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Method in Food Sensory Evaluation

More Information
  • Received Date: December 27, 2020
  • Available Online: July 19, 2021
  • To make the weight of each evaluation index in food sensory evaluation more reasonable and scientific, the feasibility of subjective-objective combination weighting method in food sensory evaluation was investigated. Taking the sensory evaluation of yogurt as an example, taking the number of significant differences among groups as the index, the optimal subjective weighting method and objective weighting method were selected. Based on the selected subjective weighting method and objective weighting method, the feasibility of subjective-objective combination weighting method in food sensory evaluation was investigated. The results showed that, when the number of significant differences among groups was taken as the index, the ring comparison method(20) was better than forced decision method(16) in the subjective weighting method; the entropy method(20) was better than principal component analysis method(18) in the objective weighting method; the product method and the linear efficacy coefficient method(18) were better than the combination weighting method of unitized constraints(16) among the combination weighting methods, but after synthesizing the ranking results of the three methods, it was concluded that the linear efficacy coefficient method had more advantages in the sensory evaluation of yogurt. It is hoped that this paper could provide a new idea for how to determine the weight of each evaluation index in food sensory evaluation.
  • [1]
    Stefanowicz P. Sensory evaluation of food principles and practices[J]. Journal of Wine Research,2013,24(1):80. doi: 10.1080/09571264.2013.764662
    [2]
    曾习, 曾思敏, 龙维贞. 食品感官评价技术应用研究进展[J]. 中国调味品,2019,44(3):198−200. [Zeng X, Zeng S M, Long W Z. Research progress of application of food sensory evaluation technology[J]. China Condiment,2019,44(3):198−200.
    [3]
    Galmarini M. The role of sensory science in the evaluation of food pairing[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science,2020,33:149−155. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.05.003
    [4]
    Ioannou I, Mauris G, Trystram G, et al. Back-propagation of imprecision in a cheese ripening fuzzy model based on human sensory evaluations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157(9):1179−1187. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.016
    [5]
    Perrot N, Ioannou I, Allais I, et al. Fuzzy concepts applied to food product quality control: A review[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157(9):1145−1154. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.013
    [6]
    Bhalerao P P, Mahale S A, Dhar R, et al. Optimizing the formulation for a pomegranate-amla-muskmelon based mixed fruit beverage using sensory analysis and evaluating its thermal stability[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2020,133:109907. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109907
    [7]
    Shrivastava C, Chakraborty S. Bread from wheat flour partially replaced by fermented chickpea flour: Optimizing the formulation and fuzzy analysis of sensory data[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2018,90:215−223. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.019
    [8]
    Singh K, Mishra A, Mishra H. Fuzzy analysis of sensory attributes of bread prepared from millet-based composite flours[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2012,48(2):276−282. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.03.026
    [9]
    Ioannou I, Perrot N, Hossenlopp J, et al. The fuzzy set theory: A helpful tool for the estimation of sensory properties of crusting sausage appearance by a single expert[J]. Food Quality & Preference,2002,13(7−8):589−595.
    [10]
    Petropoulos S, Karavas C S, Balafoutis A T, et al. Fuzzy logic tool for wine quality classification[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2017,142:552−562. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.11.015
    [11]
    Mathangi S, Maran J P. Sensory evaluation of apple ber using fuzzy TOPSIS[J/OL]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.962.
    [12]
    Kumar R, Ghosh P, Srinivasa R, et al. Sensory evaluation of microwave assisted ultrasound treated soymilk beverage using fuzzy logic[J/OL]. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.02.005.
    [13]
    高涛, 陈虹旭, 唐华丽. 模糊数学感官评价法优化三种干果复合固体饮料的配方[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(9):175−180. [Gao T, Chen H X, Tang H L. Optimization of the formulation of three kinds of dried fruit composite solid beverage by fuzzy mathematics sensory evaluation method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2020,41(9):175−180.
    [14]
    姬长英. 感官模糊综合评价中权重分配的正确制定[J]. 食品科学,1991(3):9−11. [Ji C Y. The right distribution of weight in fuzzy comprehensive sensory evaluation[J]. Food Science,1991(3):9−11.
    [15]
    周英男, 侯慧, 周学飞, 等. 中国绿色增长政策评估指标体系研究[J]. 管理现代化,2018,38(3):92−95. [Zhou Y N, Hou H, Zhou X F, et al. Study on the evaluation index system of China's green growth policy[J]. Modernization of Management,2018,38(3):92−95.
    [16]
    项惠丹, 许时婴. 杏、南瓜、胡萝卜复合果蔬汁的制备[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2009,28(3):320−324. [Xiang H D, Xu S Y. Preparation of compound beverage of apricot, carrot and pumpkin[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology,2009,28(3):320−324. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-1689.2009.03.007
    [17]
    代文婷, 吴宏, 邢丽杰, 等. 模糊数学结合响应面法优化番茄调味酱的配方[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(11):211−217. [Dai W T, Wu H, Xing L J, et al. The optimization of tomato sauce recipe based on fuzzy mathematics and response surface method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019,40(11):211−217.
    [18]
    易宇文, 范文教, 乔明锋, 等. 基于模糊数学与智能感官评价的鱼香调味汁配方优化研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2017(11):132−139. [Yi Y W, Fan W J, Qiao M F, et al. Research on the formula optimization of Yuxiang sauce based on fuzzy mathematics and intelligence sensory evaluation[J]. China Food Additives,2017(11):132−139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2513.2017.11.015
    [19]
    徐君飞, 耿倩. 南瓜-胡萝卜-西红柿复合澄清蔬菜汁饮料的研制[J]. 食品研究与开发,2015,36(22):56−60. [Xu J F, Geng Q. Development of compound clarifying vegetable drinks made from pumpkin, carrot and tomato[J]. Food Research and Development,2015,36(22):56−60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2015.22.014
    [20]
    Chang Y, Liu C, Liu M, et al. Differentiation degree combination weighting method for investment decision-making risk assessment in power grid construction projects[J]. Global Energy Interconnection,2019,2(5):465−477. doi: 10.1016/j.gloei.2019.11.022
    [21]
    Zhu X, Niu D, Wang X, et al. Comprehensive energy saving evaluation of circulating cooling water system based on combination weighting method[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,157:113735. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113735
    [22]
    Peng T, Deng H. Comprehensive evaluation on water resource carrying capacity in Karst areas using cloud model with combination weighting method: A case study of Guiyang, southwest China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2020,27(7):1−17.
    [23]
    中华人共和国卫生部. GB 19302-2010食品安全国家标准: 发酵乳[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.

    Ministry of Hygiene of People's Republic of China. GB 19302-2010 national food safety standard: Fermented milk[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2010.
    [24]
    高丽娇, 刘佳霖, 程尚, 等. 基于模糊评判的蜂蜜感官评价及阈值分析[J]. 食品科学,2014,35(22):190−193. [Gao L J, Liu J L, Cheng S, et al. Sensory evaluation and threshold determination of honey based on fuzzy comprehensive judgment[J]. Food Science,2014,35(22):190−193. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201422036
    [25]
    张丽红, 谢建华, 吴劼. 模糊数学在蘑菇羹感官评价中的应用[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(3):59−62. [Zhang L H, Xie J H, Wu J. Application of fuzzy mathematics sensory evaluation of mushroom soup[J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2010,31(3):59−62.
    [26]
    任静. 提高多指标决策客观性的赋权方法[J]. 管理评论,2012,24(5):160−169. [Ren J. Weighting approach to improving objectivity of multiple indexes decision-making[J]. Management Review,2012,24(5):160−169.
    [27]
    王琼, 卢聪, 李法云, 等. 基于主成分分析和熵权法的河流生境质量评价方法——以清河为例[J]. 生态科学,2017,36(4):185−193. [Wang Q, Lu C, Li F Y, et al. River habitat quality assessment based on principal component analysis and entropy weight in Qinghe River[J]. Ecological Science,2017,36(4):185−193.
    [28]
    吴易雯, 李莹杰, 张列宇, 等. 基于主客观赋权模糊综合评价法的湖泊水生态系统健康评价[J]. 湖泊科学,2017,29(5):1091−1102. [Wu Y W, Li Y J, Zhang L Y, et al. Assessment of lakes ecosystem health based on objective and subjective weighting combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences,2017,29(5):1091−1102. doi: 10.18307/2017.0507
    [29]
    杨小林, 李义玲. 基于客观赋权法的长江流域环境风险时空动态综合评价[J]. 中国科学院大学学报,2015,32(3):349−355. [Yang X L, Li Y L. Dynamic assessment of environmental risk for Yangtze River basin using objective weighting method[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2015,32(3):349−355. doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.03.009
    [30]
    吴泽河, 熊双丽. 响应面-主成分分析法优化低糖菊芋饼干配方[J]. 核农学报,2018,32(3):539−547. [Wu Z H, Xion S L. Optimization of low sugar Jerusalem artichoke biscuit formula by response surface methodology and principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences,2018,32(3):539−547. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.03.0539
    [31]
    赵婷婷, 王欣, 卢海燕, 等. 低场核磁共振结合主成分分析法在食用油脂品质分析中的应用[J]. 现代食品科技,2014,30(9):179−185. [Zhao T T, Wang X, Lu H Y, et al. The quality assessment of edible oils and fats by LF-NMR coupled with PCA[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology,2014,30(9):179−185.
    [32]
    崔曰新, 张景珍, 王思雨, 等. 基于熵权法和灰色关联度法的羌活饮片质量评价研究[J]. 中草药,2019,50(23):5724−5730. [Cui Y X, Zhang J Z, Wang S Y, et al. Quality evaluation of Notopterygii rhizoma et radix slices by entropy weight and gray relative analysis method[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2019,50(23):5724−5730. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2019.23.012
    [33]
    李红峥, 曹红霞, 郭莉杰, 等. 沟灌方式和灌水量对温室番茄综合品质与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2016,49(21):4179−4191. [Li H Z, Cao H X, Guo L J, et al. Effect of furrow irrigation pattern and irrigation amount on comprehensive quality and yield of greenhouse tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2016,49(21):4179−4191. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.21.012
    [34]
    崔杰, 党耀国, 刘思峰. 基于灰色关联度求解指标权重的改进方法[J]. 中国管理科学,2008(5):141−145. [Cui J, Dang Y G, Liu S F. An improved approach for determining weights of attributes in decision making based on grey incidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2008(5):141−145.
    [35]
    王中兴, 徐玲. 多属性决策中一种属性权重的确定方法[J]. 统计与决策,2007(10):140−141. [Wang Z X, Xu L. A method of determining attribute weight in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Statistics & Decision,2007(10):140−141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6487.2007.10.050
    [36]
    郭昱. 权重确定方法综述[J]. 农村经济与科技,2018,29(8):252−253. [Guo Y. Summary of weight determination methods[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology,2018,29(8):252−253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2018.08.171
    [37]
    田彦芳, 万海同, 朱紫烨, 等. 基于熵权法的多目标筛选甘草黄酮类成分纯化工艺[J]. 中草药,2016,47(7):1118−1125. [Tian T F, Wan H T, Zhu Z Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of purification technology for licorice flavonoids based on entropy-weight method[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2016,47(7):1118−1125.
    [38]
    曲彤, 袁培培, 张琳, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法结合D-最优设计响应面法优化玄参蒸制工艺[J]. 中草药,2019,50(10):2325−2331. [Qu T, Yuan P P, Zhang L, et al. Optimization of steaming technology for decoction pieces of Scrophularia ningpoensis by D-optimal response surface methodology based on AHP-entropy weight method[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2019,50(10):2325−2331. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2019.10.011
    [39]
    易丽娟, 邹苏兰, 柳兰, 等. 基于G1-熵权法和响应面设计优化益气活血方醇提工艺[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志,2019,26(7):73−78. [Yi L J, Zou S L, Liu L, et al. Optimization of ethanol extraction process of Yiqi Huoxue prescription based on G1-entropy method and response surface design[J]. Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine,2019,26(7):73−78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2019.07.017
    [40]
    王欣, 赵其华, 张朝俊, 等. 基于组合权重的金阳县生态地质环境承载力评价[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报,2019,17(6):29−35. [Wang X, Zhao Q H, Zhang C J, et al. Ecological geological rnvironment carrying capacity evaluation of Jinyang county based on combined weight method[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2019,17(6):29−35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2019.06.005
    [41]
    邓庆. 松坪沟景区地震地质灾害风险评价及其应用研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2018.

    Deng Q. Study on the risk evaluation of earthquake geological hazards in Songpinggou scenic area and its application[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2018.
    [42]
    王书吉. 大型灌区节水改造项目综合后评价指标权重确定及评价方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2009.

    Wang S J. Study on indexes weights’ determination and comprehensive evaluation method of water-saving and improvement project’s post-evaluation in large-scale irrigation districts[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2009.
    [43]
    王书吉, 费良军, 雷雁斌, 等. 综合集成赋权法在灌区节水改造效益评价中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报,2008,24(12):48−51. [Wang S J, Fei L J, Lei Y B, et al. Application of combination weighting method on benefit evaluation of water saving improvement in irrigation districts[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2008,24(12):48−51. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.12.010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 柳先知,战林洁,李宏雁,李彩富,李曼,徐同成,姬娜,徐龙朝. 脱支小麦淀粉对面条品质性能影响的研究. 粮油食品科技. 2025(01): 138-146 .
    2. 苗峻伟,段续,任广跃,刘文超,李琳琳,曹伟伟. 微波冻干预制面条干燥特性及品质特征研究. 食品与发酵工业. 2024(09): 262-267 .
    3. 魏星,王晓龙,李小平,李亮,胡新中. 不同含水量面条蒸煮品质差异机制研究. 中国粮油学报. 2024(04): 49-58 .
    4. 董璐钦,李雪琴,邢志轩. 预煮时间对面条冻藏期间品质的影响. 食品工业科技. 2023(21): 83-90 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (381) PDF downloads (36) Cited by(8)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return