Comparison of Different Extraction Methods of <i>Akebia trifoliata</i> Oil and Optimization of Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Extraction Process

Weiye LI; Haishun WU; Huazhong YU

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020080255

Volume 42 Issue 10

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(10): 203-208. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020080255

LI Weiye, WU Haishun, YU Huazhong. Comparison of Different Extraction Methods of Akebia trifoliata Oil and Optimization of Supercritical CO₂ Extraction Process[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(10): 203−208. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020080255.

Citation:

PDF (1941 KB)

Comparison of Different Extraction Methods of Akebia trifoliata Oil and Optimization of Supercritical CO₂ Extraction Process

Key Laboratory of Human Forest Products and Chemical Industry Engineering, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China

More Information

Received Date: August 25, 2020
Available Online: March 17, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Taking Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) koidz seeds as raw materials, the extraction technology of seed oil by soxhlet extraction method, ultrasonic-assisted extraction method, aqueous enzyme method, three-phase partitioning distribution method and supercritical CO₂ extraction method were studied. The results showed that the yield of aqueous enzyme method was the lowest (11.00%), and the seed oil was seriously emulsified. The seed oil extracted by three-phase partitioning distribution method and ultrasonic-assisted extraction method had peculiar smell and poor quality, the yield of seed oil was higher than that of aqueous enzyme method, which was 17.42% and 29.40%. Respectively, the yield of soxhlet extraction method could reach 32.32%, but need a long time. In contrast, supercritical CO₂ extraction had the advantages of short extraction time, high yield, simple operation and no organic solvent introduced. The optimum extraction conditions were determined via response surface analysis just as follows: Extraction time, extraction kettle pressure and extraction kettle temperature were 100 min, 28 MPa and 34 ℃. The yield of seed oil was 37.01%. The experiment was repeated for three times under the optimal conditions, and the final yield was 36.87%±0.08%.

FullText(HTML)

References (26)

References

[1]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志: 第29卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 9.
[2]	李朝阁. 八月瓜酒酿造及籽油、多酚提取和抗氧化性研究[D]. 西安: 陕西科技大学, 2016.
[3]	周娜娜. 三叶木通籽油提取及生物活性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2018.
[4]	殷春燕, 杨明建, 张献忠, 等. 溶剂法提取黄刺玫籽油的工艺研究[J]. 现代食品,2020(11):95−99.
[5]	丛凯平, 李婷婷, 吴彩娥, 等. 不同方法提取油茶籽油品质比较及电子鼻分析[J]. 精细化工,2020(2):339−345.
[6]	Liu C, Hao L H, Chen F S, et al. Study on extraction of peanut protein and oil bodies by aqueous enzymatic extraction and characterization of protein[J]. Journal of Chemistry,2020:1−11.
[7]	Dhanashree C P, Akash G, Virendra K R. Comparative study of ultrasonic pretreatment and ultrasound assisted three phase partitioning for extraction of custard apple seed oil[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2020:61.
[8]	Thainara B M, Natalia S, Lucio C F, et al. Pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) by- products: Obtaining seed oil enriched with active compounds from the peel by ultrasonic- assisted extraction[J]. Journal of Food Process Engineering,2019,42(5):e13125.
[9]	杨建远, 陈芳, 宋沥文, 等. 油茶籽油提取技术研究进展[J]. 食品与机械,2016,32(2):183−187.
[10]	Zhang W M, Pan Y G, Huang W Y, et al. Optimized ultrasonic- assisted extraction of papaya seed oil from Hainan/Eksotika variety[J]. Food Science & Nutrition,2019,7(8):2692−2701.
[11]	李杏元, 张旺喜. 微波辅助超临界CO₂萃取三叶木通籽油的工艺研究[J]. 中国油脂,2018,43(12):13−17.
[12]	Priyanka, Khanam S. Supercritical CO₂ extraction of carrot seed oil: screening, optimization and economic analysis[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2020,17(4):2311−2324. doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02497-y
[13]	宋媛媛. 乙醇辅助水酶法提取牡丹籽油工艺研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2018.
[14]	李杨, 江连洲, 杨柳. 水酶法制取植物油的国内外发展动态[J]. 食品工业科技,2009,30(6):383−387.
[15]	冷玉娴. 水酶法提取葵花籽油和葵花籽蛋白的回收[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2007.
[16]	张卫国, 卢春花. 三相分配法从茶籽中提取油脂的研究[J]. 食品工业,2011,32(3):81−83.
[17]	张娟, 代鑫鹏, 周研, 等. 水酶法提取牡丹籽油的工艺条件优化[J]. 食品研究与开发,2018,39(18):51−56.
[18]	王慧娟, 吴正奇, 黄梦萍, 等. 乙醇预处理水酶法提取牡丹籽油的工艺优化[J]. 食品研究与开发,2020,41(12):135−139.
[19]	黄鑫, 张利军, 张保艳. 油茶籽油提取方法对比分析[J]. 中国油脂,2019,44(6):9−13.
[20]	Peng L, Ye Q, Liu X Y, et al. Optimization of aqueous enzymatic method for Camellia sinensis oil extraction and reuse of enzymes in the process[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,2019,128(6):716−722. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.05.010
[21]	Panadare D C, Rathod V K. Three phase partitioning for extraction of oil: A review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology,2017,68:145−151.
[22]	Zhang L, Zhou C S, Wang B, et al. Study of ultrasonic cavitation during extraction of the peanut oil at varying frequencies[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2017,37:106−113. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.034
[23]	王小媛, 马宝晨, 纵伟. 不同提取方法对杜仲籽油质量的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(23):119−124.
[24]	王呈馨, 张忠, 范柳萍, 等. 翅果油超临界CO₂流体萃取工艺优化及其不同提取方法的比较[J]. 中国油脂,2019,44(7):12−15.
[25]	高妮娜, 刘鸿铖, 邹岩, 等. 提取方法对奇亚籽油品质特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2020,41(6):284−291.
[26]	李玉邯, 陈宇飞, 杨柳, 等. 超声辅助超临界二氧化碳萃取紫苏籽油的工艺研究[J]. 粮食与油脂,2016,29(12):45−47.

Supplements (0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	周勇刚. 不同种质资源花椒的品质差异及影响因素分析. 绿色科技. 2024(05): 152-155 .
2.	刘诚诚，蔺雨阳，何玲，杨涛，俞静，沈杰，蒋祺，彭建勇，兰海. 石漠土结构化培肥下青花椒产量性状与光合行为的平衡. 农学学报. 2024(06): 60-66 .
3.	徐丽，朱田田，晋玲，黄钰芳，马晓辉，康舒淇. 基于感官评价和化学计量学的兰州百合品质分析. 食品工业科技. 2024(18): 219-227 . 本站查看
4.	蔡思进，李雅芝，刘慧娟，王耀，谢姣. 低温贮藏对鲜青花椒品质的影响. 中国果菜. 2023(05): 29-34+63 .
5.	曾维友，周於强，池浩. 颗粒度对干制青花椒粉品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2023(20): 265-275 .
6.	严春俊，郭川川，李般程，谢思，马钤，王浩文. 不同品种青花椒品质对比分析. 食品工业. 2022(11): 314-320 .