ZHANG Yunliang, DOU Boxin, LIU Lizhai, ZHANG Yu, LIU Ning, ZHANG Na, XU Chenran, LV Dan, LIU Ying. Analysis of Effects of Four Improvers on Quality of Potato Noodles Based on the Coefficient of Variation Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(5): 26-32. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050048
Citation: ZHANG Yunliang, DOU Boxin, LIU Lizhai, ZHANG Yu, LIU Ning, ZHANG Na, XU Chenran, LV Dan, LIU Ying. Analysis of Effects of Four Improvers on Quality of Potato Noodles Based on the Coefficient of Variation Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(5): 26-32. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020050048

Analysis of Effects of Four Improvers on Quality of Potato Noodles Based on the Coefficient of Variation Method

More Information
  • Received Date: May 07, 2020
  • Available Online: March 02, 2021
  • The influence of different improvers on the textural properties,stretching properties and cooking properties of potato noodles were studied by a single-factor test.Variation coefficient method was used to get the different modifier under the action of the importance of each target size,again through the standardization of the index value and weight calculation,the influence of four kinds of modifier on the potato noodles quality were discussed. The results showed that the influences of different indexes on potato noodle quality were as follows:Broken rate(0.048) > drawing force(0.205) > elasticity(0.086) > loss of dry materials(0.065) > stickiness(0.048) > stretch distance(0.036) > water absorption of dry materials(0.031) > resilience(0.027) > hardness(0.020). The influence of different modifiers on the quality of noodles was as follows:xanthan gum(1.5467) > gluten powder(1.4304) > TG enzyme(1.3878) > salt(0.9818). The microstructure of 30% potato noodles with modified agent(salt of 1.5%,xanthan gum of 0.6%,TG enzyme of 0.6 U/g and gluten powerr of 8%)was significantly improved by electron microscopy. The coefficient of variation method can not only be used to study the quality improvement of potato noodles,but also be a good method to select indexes in the research of product development in the field of food.
  • [1]
    Zhang H,Xu F,Wu Y,et al. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2017,16(12):2924-2932.
    [2]
    Ezekiel R,Singh N,Sharma S,et al. Beneficial phytochemicals in potato:A review[J].Food Research International,2013,50(2):487-496.
    [3]
    Lorenz O A.Studies on potato nutrition Ⅲ.Chemical composition and uptake of nutrients by Kern County potatoes[J]. American Potato Journal,1947,24(9):281-293.
    [4]
    Anthony R B,Tamie L V,Gordon J F,et al. US department of agriculture,agricultural research service[J]. Water Resources Research,2011(47):1-5.
    [5]
    Kass L,Weekes J,Carpenter L.Effect of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure:A meta-analysis[J].European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,2012,66(4):411-418.
    [6]
    Zaheer K,Akhtar M H.Potato production,usage,and nutrition:A review[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,2016,56(5):711-721.
    [7]
    Hnin K K,Zhang M,Li Z,et al. Comparison of quality aspects and energy consumption of restructured taro and potato chips under three drying methods[J].Journal of Food Process Engineering,2019,42(7):e13249.
    [8]
    Barreto I M A,Tribuzi G,Marsaioli A Jr,et al. Oil-free potato chips produced by microwave multiflash drying[J].Journal of Food Engineering,2019,261:133-139.
    [9]
    沈宇光.含抗性淀粉的马铃薯重组米的制备及其性质研究[D].沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2019.
    [10]
    张克,朱子博,毕荃,等.二次挤压制备重组米的响应面优化及品质研究[J].食品工业科技,2019,40(16):133-139.
    [11]
    陈金凤,汪月,马云翔,等.马铃薯淀粉对面团流变学特性及酥性饼干品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2020,46(5):121-127.
    [12]
    郭意明,丛爽,邓惠馨,等.鱼糜和马铃薯粉对饼干质构和风味的影响[J].食品科学,2017,38(20):96-102.
    [13]
    闫晨苗. 低GI马铃薯面包工艺的研究及品质分析[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学,2020.
    [14]
    李叶贝,任广跃,屈展平,等.基于变异系数法对不同干燥方法马铃薯全粉复合面条品质的评价[J].食品科学,2020,41(1):48-54.
    [15]
    朱永,梁杉,张敏,等.添加不同品种和类型的马铃薯全粉对鲜湿面条品质的影响[J].食品科学技术学报,2019,37(2):94-101.
    [16]
    杨健,康建平,张星灿,等.高含量马铃薯全粉挂面品质改良剂的研究[J].粮油食品科技,2019,27(5):14-20.
    [17]
    王霞,朱科学,钱海峰,等.葡萄糖氧化酶和戊聚糖酶对面团流变学性质的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2009,24(4):17-22.
    [18]
    门宝辉,赵燮京,梁川.基于变异系数权重的水质评价属性识别模型[J].郑州大学学报(理学版),2003,35(3):86-89.
    [19]
    李澄非,田果,董超俊,等.基于变异系数法的工业产品表面缺陷快速检测应用研究[J].化工学报,2018,69(3):1238-1243.
    [20]
    郝曦煜,杨涛,梁杰,等.160份外引鹰嘴豆种质主要农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2020,21(4):875-883.
    [21]
    Majdar H A,Vafakhah M,Sharifikia M,et al. Spatial and temporal variability of soil moisture in relation with topographic and meteorological factors in south of Ardabil Province,Iran[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2018,190(9):500.
    [22]
    Liu Y,Wang D G,Chen X M,et al. An equation based on fuzzy mathematics to assess the timing of haemodialysis initiation[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9(1):5871.
    [23]
    Bai X H,Zhang J.Environmental interpretation of forest communities in Xiaowutai Mountain by fuzzy mathematics analysis[J].Ecological Informatics,2018,48:178-186.
    [24]
    徐德进,徐广春,徐鹿,等.喷雾参数对自走式喷杆喷雾机稻田喷雾农药利用率及雾滴沉积分布的影响[J].农药学学报,2020,22(2):324-332.
    [25]
    洪陈杰,黄曼,夏才初,等.岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(6):2098-2109.
    [26]
    Sun Y,Liang X J,Xiao C L.Assessing the influence of land use on groundwater pollution based on coefficient of variation weight method:A case study of Shuangliao City[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2019,26(34):34964-34976.
    [27]
    Tran P H,Heuchenne C.CUSUM control charts for the coefficient of variation with measurement errors[J].IFAC-Papers On Line,2019,52(13):1884-1889.
    [28]
    Zhang Y X,Han Z J,Xu G Q.Stability and spectral properties of general tree-shaped wave networks with variable coefficients[J].Acta Applicandae Mathematicae,2019,164(1):219-249.
    [29]
    杨钠.马铃薯全粉面条加工和保鲜技术研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015.
    [30]
    刘丽宅. 马铃薯面条的研制与品质改良研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨商业大学,2017.
    [31]
    任广跃,刘亚男,乔小全,等.基于变异系数权重法对怀山药干燥全粉品质的评价[J].食品科学,2017,38(1):53-59.
    [32]
    夏鹏飞,马肖,汪洁,等.基于变异系数权重的模糊物元模型评价黄管秦艽药材的质量[J].中国现代应用药学,2018,35(4):461-466.
    [33]
    王冠岳,陈洁,王春,等.氯化钠对面条品质影响的研究[J].中国粮油学报,2008,23(6):184-187.
    [34]
    陈海峰,杨其林,姚科,等.黄原胶对面条品质的影响[J].粮食加工,2008,33(1):70-74.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HOU Wenjuan, QIN Yang, ZHANG Dan, JIANG Xinjie, YU Zhongna, GENG Xin, DU Qijing, JIANG Hongning, YANG Yongxin, FAN Rongbo. Process Optimization and Product Characteristics of Pea Protein Fermented Milk[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(2): 175-182. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023040090
    [2]TIAN Mengyang, TIAN Xia, WANG Zhiwei, ZHOU Zhongkai. Process Optimization and Storage Characteristics Analysis of Lactic Acid Bacteria Lyophilized Powder Fermented Whole Wheat Sourdough Bread[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(12): 172-184. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080230
    [3]ZHANG Jiamin, YUAN Bo, WANG Wei, YE Fuyun, TANG Chun, WENG Dehui. Effect of Quality Improvers on the Characteristics of Shallow Fermented Sausage Products and Principal Component Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(18): 244-251. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020120247
    [4]ZHANG Jiamin, WANG Wei, JI Lili, BAI Ting, ZHAO Zhiping, CHEN Lin. Research on the Imitative Natural Air-dried Processing of Shallow Fermented Sausage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(12): 160-167. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020080166
    [5]ZHANG Jiamin, WANG Wei, BAI Ting, JI Lili, WANG Zhengxi, YUAN Bo. Comparison of Regional Characteristics of Sichuan Traditional Sausage and the Analysis of “Shallow Fermentation” Conditions[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(3): 43-47,52. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020030367
    [6]SUN Ying-ying, XU Yan-shun, XIA Wen-shui, JIANG Qi-xing, GAO Pei. Changes in Physicochemical and Sensory Quality of Fermented Fish during Storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(17): 286-291. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.17.048
    [7]LIU Na, PAN Xing-lu, ZHANG Shuang, YANG Qing-xi, JI Ming-shan, ZHANG Zhi-hong. Effect of Storage and Preservation and Processing on the Flutriafol Residues in Strawberry and Processed Products[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(14): 219-222. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.14.041
    [8]SONG Chun-lu, HU Wen-zhong, CHEN Chen, LI Xiao-bo. Research of fermentation and storage characteristics in Chinese sauerkraut[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (09): 376-379. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.09.066
    [9]MI Hong-bo, LIU Shuang, LI Xue-peng, LI Jian-rong. Research progress of nature antioxidant in inhibiting lipid oxidation of aquatic product during storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (08): 364-368. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.08.068
    [10]发酵法桑汁饮料加工工艺的研究[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 1999, (05): 35-37. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.1999.05.012
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 袁惠君,徐琰莹,余诗曼,冯欢,袁毅君,张欢欢,何苗苗. 一株抗真菌卡利比克迈耶氏酵母(Meyerozymacaribbica lut-Y1)的鉴定及其抑菌活性. 食品研究与开发. 2025(03): 181-187 .
    2. 申旻,陈雅楠,刘瑶,刘晨,朱晨辉,薛文娇. 白酒酿造副产物黄水中产酯酵母菌株分离鉴定及产酯条件优化. 现代农业科技. 2024(12): 154-159+166 .
    3. 马吉喆,李镕涛,陆筑凤,李加友,徐涛. 提高酿酒酵母耐受性能的研究进展. 食品工业. 2023(01): 178-182 .
    4. 王丹,江春阳,邓乔晟,杨勤,周浓. 地参发酵酒中专用酵母菌的筛选、鉴定及特性研究. 食品科技. 2023(05): 18-25 .
    5. 潘庆珉,杨洁,岳海涛,申彤. 阿勒泰地区酸驼乳中酵母菌的分离鉴定及耐受性分析. 中国乳品工业. 2023(06): 27-31+39 .
    6. 赵广河,胡梦琪,陆玺文,赵丰丽. 桃金娘果酒酵母菌的筛选鉴定及生长特性分析. 中国酿造. 2023(09): 103-108 .
    7. 冼佳露,李理. 三类传统发酵食品中蜡样芽孢杆菌的污染状况研究. 中国酿造. 2023(12): 33-37 .
    8. 尹晓燕,王羽,牛秋红. 根系土壤假丝酵母菌Candida sp. YIN9对大丽轮枝菌和全齿复活线虫的抑制作用. 生物安全学报. 2022(01): 56-63 .
    9. 徐婉莹,戚晓雪,何晓霞,徐莹. 逆境对GST基因过表达库德毕赤酵母G43生长及脱镉能力的影响. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2022(11): 3620-3626 .
    10. 袁野,李云成,孟凡冰,焦晓磊,王欣瑶,罗永琪. 贵州红酸汤研究进展. 粮食与油脂. 2022(06): 19-23 .
    11. 乔旭辉,禄亚洲. 察隅县野生沙棘果实酵母菌分离鉴定. 高原农业. 2022(04): 362-368+386 .
    12. 王辉,袁婷玉,白卫东,赵文红,黄桂颖,杨婉媛. 青梅自然发酵液中酵母菌的分离鉴定及特性研究. 食品科技. 2021(08): 16-21 .
    13. 秦宇蒙,周笑犁,管庆林,刘云寒,吴承木. 基于高通量测序分析番茄自然发酵过程中的真菌多样性. 福建农业学报. 2021(09): 1110-1118 .
    14. 闫洪洋,黄启蒙,蔡兴华,张立立,徐志强,马林,李萌. 产香菌株的分离鉴定及其发酵产物在卷烟加香中的应用. 轻工学报. 2021(06): 47-54 .
    15. 韦玉梅,张文倩,朱闪闪,李杨,雷勇辉,孙燕飞. 果蔬酵素中优良酵母菌的分离、鉴定及耐受性研究. 中国酿造. 2021(12): 87-92 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (254) PDF downloads (18) Cited by(20)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return