Optimization of Decalcification Process of Yellow Croaker Scales by Response Surface Methodology

LI Wenfeng; WANG Biaoshi; YU Shijian; CHEN Shuqi; YANG Shengyuan; HU Xiaojun; PENG Yuanhuai; JIANG Min; MA Jingqiu

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019100209

Volume 42 Issue 4

Feb. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Science and Technology of Food Industry > 2021 > 42(4): 155-160. > DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019100209

LI Wenfeng, WANG Biaoshi, YU Shijian, CHEN Shuqi, YANG Shengyuan, HU Xiaojun, PENG Yuanhuai, JIANG Min, MA Jingqiu. Optimization of Decalcification Process of Yellow Croaker Scales by Response Surface Methodology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(4): 155-160. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019100209

Citation:

PDF (1449 KB)

Optimization of Decalcification Process of Yellow Croaker Scales by Response Surface Methodology

School of Food Science and Engineering, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China

More Information

Received Date: October 24, 2019
Available Online: March 01, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to explore the decalcification technology of yellow croaker scales,the decalcification condition of the yellow croaker scale was optimized by using citric acid as decalcification agent under the ultrasound-assisted treatment. Three factors including solid-liquid ratio,citric acid concentration and ultrasonic time were selected to investigate the effects of decalcification on yellow croaker scales. The single factor experiment was carried out with the decalcification rate as the evaluation standard to determine the single factor optimal level. On this basis,the Box-Behnken design was adopted to optimize the decalcification of fish scales,and the optimal conditions for decalcification of the yellow croaker scales were obtained as follows,solid-liquid ratio 1:19 (g/mL),citric acid concentration 10.5%,ultrasonic time 65 min,with the demineralization ratio 99.18%. The results also showed that the loss rate of collagen was 4.08% under the optimal conditions,and the loss rate was relatively small. Therefore,the ultrasound-assisted citric acid treatment had a good effect on decalcification of yellow croaker scales,which would provide a basis for further research on extraction of collagen from yellow croaker scales.
- yellow croaker scales,
- decalcification,
- citric acid,
- ultrasonic,
- response surface

FullText(HTML)

References (21)

References

[1]	周爱林.试论我国渔业发展现状、问题及出路[J]. 农民致富之友,2018(23):126.
[2]	张俊杰,曾庆孝.鱼鳞的开发利用前景[J]. 中国水产,2004(5):74-75.
[3]	杨立.鱼鳞胶原肽与活性钙的回收、活性评价及相关产品开发[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2011.
[4]	石维焕,许永安.鱼鳞利用的研究进展[J]. 福建水产,2011,33(4):67-72.
[5]	段婷婷,郑威,黄玉松.鱼鳞的结构及其仿生材料[J]. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版),2017,38(4):288-292.
[6]	吴凌涛,林晨,王李平,等.十种淡水鱼脂肪酸组成及其营养价值分析[J]. 食品工业,2017,38(8):269-271.
[7]	Wei Z H,Ma J,Pan X Y,et al. Dietary hydroxyproline improves the growth and muscle quality of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea[J]. Aquaculture,2016,464:497-504.
[8]	Wu T T,Ge Y J,Li Y,et al. Quality enhancement of large yellow croaker treated with edible coatings based on chitosan and lysozyme[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2018,120(Pt A):1072-1079.
[9]	吴锁连,康怀彬,李冬姣.鱼鳞有效成分提取技术的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2017,45(27):110-112 ,141.
[10]	Wang Y,Regenstein J M.Effect of EDTA,HCl,and citric acid on Ca salt removal from Asian(silver)carp scales prior to gelatin extraction[J]. Journal of Food Science,2009,74(6):C426-C431.
[11]	蒋柏泉,曾芳,曾庆芳,等.鳙鱼鱼鳞盐酸脱钙工艺及动力学研究[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版),2014,36(2):108-112.
[12]	彭元怀,刘小美,李杏清.柠檬酸法鱼鳞脱钙的工艺研究[J]. 农业机械,2012(21):132-135.
[13]	王梅英,陈慧斌,吴云辉.超声波辅助酸法脱除鱼鳞钙工艺研究[J]. 宁德师范学院学报(自然科学版),2013,25(4):383-385,392.
[14]	肖莉,郭玉华,李敬芬.青鱼鱼鳞柠檬酸法脱钙工艺的优化[J]. 湖州师范学院学报,2017,39(4):21-25.
[15]	胡爱军,宋飞莹,郑捷,等.利用柠檬酸脱除鲢鱼鱼鳞中钙的工艺条件优化[J]. 食品研究与开发,2017,38(16):77-81.
[16]	周如意,刘明华.草鱼鳞盐酸脱钙工艺研究[J]. 农产品加工,2017(7):22-25.
[17]	陈正平,万丽娟,魏林生,等.柠檬酸浸取脱除鳙鱼鱼鳞钙的研究[J]. 食品与机械,2014,30(4):151-154.
[18]	Muthumari K,Anand M,Maruthupandy M.Collagen extract from marine finfish scales as a potential mosquito larvicide[J]. The Protein Journal,2016,35(6):391-400.
[19]	高玲玲,侯成立,高远,等.胶原蛋白热稳定性研究进展[J]. 中国食品学报,2018,18(5):195-207.
[20]	郭恒斌,曾庆祝.分光光度法测定鱼皮中羟脯氨酸含量[J]. 食品研究与开发,2007,28(10):145-148.
[21]	崔潇,江虹锐,刘小玲,等.响应面法优化罗非鱼鱼皮胶原多肽螯合镁的工艺条件的研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2013,34(15):238-241 ,245.

[1]	Longlong LUO, Weihe REN, Linhai CAI, Siru LIU, Ulamubek·duiSheikhdale, Alimat Sharizah, Gongtao DING, Li SONG, Li LUO, Shien CHEN. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Improving Diabetes Metabolism[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(8): 404-409. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020070270
[2]	Qisen XIANG, Rong ZHANG, Guihong DU, Limin WANG, Aimin JIANG. Inactivation Effects and Mechanisms of Plasma-Activated Water against S. typhimurium[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(8): 138-143. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020080241
[3]	LI Ke, YU Lan-xiu, LIU Xiao-yu, LIU Dong, ZHANG Wei-guang. Research Progress on Improving Sleep Mechanism of γ-aminobutyric Acid[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(14): 353-358. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.14.058
[4]	LU Jing-jing, WANG Na-na, JIAO Wen-shu, HUO Gui-cheng. The Mechanism and Research Progress of Probiotics in Relieving Obesity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(3): 296-299,306. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.03.047
[5]	WANG Hui, ZHAO Jiang, YANG Sheng-nan, ZHANG Xiao-han, CHENG Jing, WANG Hao. Anti-aging Effects and Underling Mechanism of D-chiro-inosiol on Glucose-Induced Oxidative Damage in Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(2): 282-286. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.02.049
[6]	ZHOU Ting-ting, CAO Shao-qian, LI Si-si, QI Xiang-yang. Advances in oxidation deterioration mechanisms of oils and fats under non-thermal treatment[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (10): 385-388. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.10.066
[7]	ZHANG Hong, ZHOU Ying-yu, LU Wei-hong, CHEN Cui-lin, GAO Xin, SHAN Shan. Overview on anti-tumor mechanism and effect of diosmin[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (24): 376-379. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.24.065