• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
王浩文, 邓静, 唐红梅, 吴华昌, 皮春城, 陈思琪, 王南珍, 刘永熙. 不同品牌樟茶鸭风味特征分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(6): 215-222,227. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.06.036
引用本文: 王浩文, 邓静, 唐红梅, 吴华昌, 皮春城, 陈思琪, 王南珍, 刘永熙. 不同品牌樟茶鸭风味特征分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(6): 215-222,227. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.06.036
WANG Hao-wen, DENG Jing, TANG Hong-mei, WU Hua-chang, PI Chun-cheng, CHEN Si-qi, WANG Nan-zhen, LIU Yong-xi. Analysis of Flavor Characteristics of Smoked Duck from Different Brands[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(6): 215-222,227. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.06.036
Citation: WANG Hao-wen, DENG Jing, TANG Hong-mei, WU Hua-chang, PI Chun-cheng, CHEN Si-qi, WANG Nan-zhen, LIU Yong-xi. Analysis of Flavor Characteristics of Smoked Duck from Different Brands[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(6): 215-222,227. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.06.036

不同品牌樟茶鸭风味特征分析

Analysis of Flavor Characteristics of Smoked Duck from Different Brands

  • 摘要: 为比较老城南、罗腊肉、桂花庄、古蜀食者、孔师傅及全聚德六个品牌樟茶鸭的风味特征及大众对樟茶鸭风味的接受程度,通过模糊数学法的感官评鉴,结合电子鼻及气相色谱-质谱联用仪(gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,GC-MS),对6种不同品牌樟茶鸭的挥发性风味特征进行分析。结果表明:模糊数学法感官评鉴得到桂花庄、古蜀食者及老城南樟茶鸭的风味更易被大众接受。结合电子鼻指纹图谱及主成分分析,得到老城南和古蜀食者樟茶鸭风味相似,桂花庄和孔师傅樟茶鸭风味相似,罗腊肉、全聚德樟茶鸭与其他四个品牌樟茶鸭风味差异较大。通过GC-MS测定,老城南、罗腊肉、桂花庄、古蜀食者、孔师傅和全聚德樟茶鸭分别分离出54、51、33、49、54、31种风味化合物,醇类、醛类、酮类化合物是形成樟茶鸭风味的主体成分;酚类、烃类化合物的种类及相对百分含量不同,导致全聚德、罗腊肉樟茶鸭与其他品牌樟茶鸭风味差异较大。本文分析了大众对不同风味樟茶鸭的接受程度及各品牌樟茶鸭的风味差异,为樟茶鸭的标准化、工业化生产提供理论依据。

     

    Abstract: The smoked duck of Laochengnan(LAO),Luolarou(LUO),Guihuazhuang(GUI),Gushushizhe(GU),Kongshifu(KONG)and Quanjude(QUAN)were selected to compare the flavor characteristics and the public's preference of the flavor.The volatile flavor of smoked duck were analyzed by fuzzy mathematics sensory evaluation,combined with electronic nose and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.The results showed that the brands of Gui and Gu tasted better than others. Combined with the fingerprint and principal component analysis of electronic nose,it was found that the flavor of LAO was similar to GU,the flavor of GUI was similar to KONG,and the flavor of LUO and QUAN was quite different from other four brands. Through GC-MS measurement,54,51,33,49,54 and 31 flavor compounds were isolated from Lao,Luo,Gui,Gu,Kong and Quan smoked duck. Alcohols,aldehydes and ketones were the main components flavor of smoked duck.The different types and relative content of phenols and hydrocarbon compounds lead to the great difference in flavor between QUAN and LUO smoked duck. In this paper,the public's taste preferences and flavor differences for smoked ducks were analyzed,which was provided theoretical basis for the standardization and industrial production of smoked duck.

     

/

返回文章
返回