• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
王丹, 孙杰, 郑子薇, 李鹏宇, 陈海涛, 孙宝国, 张玉玉. 传统手工与方便包装羊肉泡馍挥发性风味成分的对比探究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, (23): 277-285. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.23.044
引用本文: 王丹, 孙杰, 郑子薇, 李鹏宇, 陈海涛, 孙宝国, 张玉玉. 传统手工与方便包装羊肉泡馍挥发性风味成分的对比探究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, (23): 277-285. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.23.044
WANG Dan, SUN Jie, ZHENG Zi-wei, LI Peng-yu, CHEN Hai-tao, SUN Bao-guo, ZHANG Yu-yu. Comparison analysis of volatile flavor constituents in lamb stew of bread between traditional cooking and flexible packaging[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (23): 277-285. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.23.044
Citation: WANG Dan, SUN Jie, ZHENG Zi-wei, LI Peng-yu, CHEN Hai-tao, SUN Bao-guo, ZHANG Yu-yu. Comparison analysis of volatile flavor constituents in lamb stew of bread between traditional cooking and flexible packaging[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (23): 277-285. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.23.044

传统手工与方便包装羊肉泡馍挥发性风味成分的对比探究

Comparison analysis of volatile flavor constituents in lamb stew of bread between traditional cooking and flexible packaging

  • 摘要: 采用同时蒸馏萃取法结合气相色谱-嗅闻-质谱技术对传统手工羊肉泡馍和方便包装羊肉泡馍中萃取液特征组分进行对比分析,结果共鉴定出138种化合物,其中传统手工羊肉泡馍中共鉴定出83种,方便包装羊肉泡馍中共鉴定出78种;两者共有物质23种。经气相色谱-嗅闻-质谱确定传统手工羊肉泡馍的关键性气味成分为:反式-2-癸烯醛、2-十一烯醛、反,反-2,4-癸二烯醛;方便包装羊肉泡馍的关键性气味成分为:1-辛烯-3-醇、反式肉桂醛、反-2-辛烯醛、4-异丙基苯甲醇,是造成两种样品香气类型具有明显的差异的原因。 

     

    Abstract: The volatile flavor components in lamb stew of bread traditional cooking and that of flexible packaging were analyzed and compared by simultaneous distillation and extraction( SDE) combine with gas chromatography- olfactometry- mass spectrometry( GC-O-MS).The results showed that 138 volatile compounds were identified in lamb stew of bread. Among these compounds,total of 83 volatile compounds were only identified in traditional cooking while 78 volatile compounds were only identified in flexible Packaging. Besides,23 compounds existed in both the two samples. The key aroma compounds were evaluated in traditional cooking product by GC-O- MS,including( E)-2-Decenal,2-Undecenal,( E,E)-2,4-Decadienal,while the key aroma compounds in flexible packaging product,including 1-Octen-3-ol,( E)- Cinnamaldehyde,( E)-2-Octenal,4-Isopropylbenzyl alcohol,this was the reasons of the obvious difference between the two types of samples.

     

/

返回文章
返回