• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
酵母蛋白酶A活性检测方法的比较[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (06): 61-64. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.06.051
引用本文: 酵母蛋白酶A活性检测方法的比较[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, (06): 61-64. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.06.051
Comparison of yeast proteinase A activity dectection methods[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (06): 61-64. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.06.051
Citation: Comparison of yeast proteinase A activity dectection methods[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, (06): 61-64. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.06.051

酵母蛋白酶A活性检测方法的比较

Comparison of yeast proteinase A activity dectection methods

  • 摘要: 利用共振光散射技术建立了一种新的蛋白酶A活性检测方法-RLS法。从标准曲线、精密度、检测限、实际样品的测定等方面,对现有的蛋白酶A活性检测方法和RLS法进行了比较。结果显示,与其他三种方法(UV法、Lowry法、Bradford法)相比,RLS法检测限低(0.662μg/mL),线性范围宽(1500μg/mL),标准曲线的线性良好(R2=0.9974),精密度高(RSD=1.95%),并在实际样品的检测中具有明显优势。有效性实验证明此方法的测定结果准确可靠,与荧光底物法测定结果之间的相关性系数为0.9917。 

     

    Abstract: A new method for proteinase A activity detection using resonance light scattering technique which was named as RLS method was established. The existing proteinase A activity detection methods and RLS method from the aspects of standard curve, precision, detection limit and the actual sample testing were compared. The result showed, RLS method had lower detection limit (0.662μg/mL) , wider linear range (1500μg/mL) , higher determination coefficient (R2=0.9974) and lower relative standard deviation (RSD=1.95%) than UV method, Lowry method and Bradford method. In addition, this method had obvious advantages in detection of actual samples. Validation test proved that RLS method was accurate and reliable, and the determination coefficient between this method and fluorescent substrate method was 0.9917.

     

/

返回文章
返回